Skip to main content

Characterization of the Minimal Penalty of a Convex Risk Measure with Applications to Robust Utility Maximization for Lévy Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XII Symposium of Probability and Stochastic Processes

Part of the book series: Progress in Probability ((PRPR,volume 73))

  • 384 Accesses

Abstract

The minimality of the penalty function associated with a convex risk measure is analyzed in this paper. First, in a general static framework, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for a penalty function defined in a convex and closed subset of the absolutely continuous measures with respect to some reference measure \(\mathbb {P}\) to be minimal on this set. When the probability space supports a Lévy process, we establish results that guarantee the minimality property of a penalty function described in terms of the coefficients associated with the density processes. These results are applied in the solution of the robust utility maximization problem for a market model based on Lévy processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J.M. Eber, D. Heath, Thinking coherently. Risk Mag. 10, 68–71 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J.M. Eber, D. Heath, Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9, 203–228 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Delbaen, Coherent risk measures on general probability spaces, in Advances in Finance and Stochastics, Essays in Honor of Dieter Sondermann, ed. by K. Sandmann, Ph. Schönbucher (Springer, Berlin, 2002), pp. 1–37

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Föllmer, A. Schied, Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance Stoch. 6, 429–447 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Föllmer, A. Schied, Robust preferences and convex risk measures, in Advances in Finance and Stochastics, Essays in Honor of Dieter Sondermann (Springer, Berlin, 2002), pp. 39–56

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Föllmer, A. Schied, Stochastic Finance. An Introduction in Discrete Time, 2nd edn. de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, vol. 27 (de Gruyter, Berlin, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Frittelli, E. Rosazza Gianin, Putting order in risk measures. J. Bank. Finance 26, 1473–1486 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Frittelli, E. Rosazza Gianin, Dynamic convex risk measures, in Risk Measures for the 21st Century, ed. by G. Szegö (Wiley, New York, 2004), pp. 227–248

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.W. He, J.G. Wang, J.A. Yan, Semimartingale Theory and Stochastic Calculus (Science Press, Beijing, 1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Heath, Back to the future. Plenary Lecture at the First World Congress of the Bachelier Society, Paris (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Hernández-Hernández, A. Schied, A control approach to robust utility maximization with logarithmic utility and time consistent penalties. Stoch. Process. Appl. 117, 980–1000 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Jacod, A. Shiryaev, Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes, 2nd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Kramkov, W. Schachermayer, The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets. Ann. Appl. Probab. 9, 904–950 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Kramkov, W. Schachermayer, Necessary and sufficient conditions in the problem of optimal investment in incomplete markets. Ann. Appl. Probab. 13, 1504–1516 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. V. Krätschmer, Robust representation of convex risk measures by probability measures. Finance Stoch. 9, 597–608 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Kunita, Representation of martingales with jumps and applications to mathematical finance, in Stochastic Analysis and Related Topics in Kyoto, ed. by H. Kunita et al. (Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2004), pp. 209–232

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. F. Maccheroni, M. Marinacci, A. Rustichini, Ambiguity aversion, robustness and the variational representation of preferences. Econometrica 74, 1447–1498 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. M.-C. Quenez, Optimal portfolio in a multiple-priors model, in Seminar on Stochastic Analysis, Random Fields and Applications IV, ed. by R. Dalang, M. Dozzi, F. Russo. Progress in Probability, vol. 58 (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2004), pp. 291–321

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Schied, Optimal investments for risk- and ambiguity-averse preferences: a duality approach. Finance Stoch. 11, 107–129 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hernández-Hernández, D., Pérez-Hernández, L. (2018). Characterization of the Minimal Penalty of a Convex Risk Measure with Applications to Robust Utility Maximization for Lévy Models. In: Hernández-Hernández, D., Pardo, J., Rivero, V. (eds) XII Symposium of Probability and Stochastic Processes. Progress in Probability, vol 73. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77643-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics