Skip to main content

Political Selection of Federal Reserve Bank Cities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Public Choice Analyses of American Economic History

Part of the book series: Studies in Public Choice ((SIPC,volume 35))

  • 348 Accesses

Abstract

The Federal Reserve Act (1913) established the Reserve Board Organization Committee (RBOC) to determine the number and location of Federal Reserve districts and Reserve banks. Some scholars argue that the decisions were politically motivated but direct econometric evidence is lacking. A regression model utilizing solely political variables correctly predicts 11 of the 12 selected cities; the exception being Cleveland’s selection over Cincinnati. Our results present direct evidence of the importance of political determinants for RBOC selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 provided that the governor and vice governor were to be appointed by the president from among the Board’s members. The Banking Act of 1935 revised the Board by dropping the Secretary and the Comptroller, and providing for seven members, all called governors and appointed for 14-year terms. It also formalized the FOMC, with a majority from the Board (seven, with five Reserve Bank presidents), but otherwise left the structure of the Federal Reserve unchanged.

  2. 2.

    The first action, from Section 2 of the Federal Reserve Act, required every national bank to subscribe to the capital stock of its Federal Reserve bank a sum equal to 6% of its own capital.

  3. 3.

    C.H. Sloan, Republican congressman from Nebraska said the process lacked systematic, objective selection criteria. In some instances “the size of the cities did not control”; similarly with “the lines of transportation and the course of business, population, and banking preferences.” “I do not know a single basis or rule that controlled in one case which has controlled in another. [P]olitics [favoritism] must have had something to do with it” (U.S. Congress 1914, p. 6441). See also McAvoy (2006).

  4. 4.

    It has been noted that Willis’ 1923 explanation of location choices emphasized politics more than his 1914 explanation, written while he was employed by the Federal Reserve (Hammes 2001).

  5. 5.

    On New York and Cincinnati, see Reserve Bank Organization Committee (1914a, pp. 83, 4360–4364).

  6. 6.

    The “Strong rule” is discussed by Chandler (1958, p. 240).

  7. 7.

    In contrast, the “economic model” McAvoy promotes uses mainly city and county-specific independent variables, as well as twice as many total variables.

  8. 8.

    Recall that both Kansas City and St. Louis are Federal Reserve cities, so the 12 cities represent 11 different states.

  9. 9.

    County votes are taken from Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. In some cases, cities are not part of any county and the votes represent the city total exclusively. In all other cases, county level is the lowest level of aggregation available.

  10. 10.

    The Federal Reserve Act made Fed membership of the more than 19,000 state banks voluntary, and few initially joined (Federal Reserve Board 1959, pp. 41–45).

  11. 11.

    Los Angeles received the 25th highest total but ultimately did not apply to become a Reserve Bank city and is not part of our sample. Seattle was the last listed city with 98 votes. Thus the remaining nine applicant cities in our sample could have received anywhere from zero to 97 votes. None of them were selected by the RBOC.

  12. 12.

    With of course the exception of Washington, DC which does not cast any ballots in presidential elections.

References

  • Bagehot W (1873) Lombard street: a description of the money market. Henry S. King & Company, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckworth D (2010) One nation under the Fed? the asymmetric effects of US monetary policy and its implications for the United States as an optimal currency area. J Macroecon 32(3):732–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder S, Spindel M (2013) Monetary politics: origins of the Federal Reserve. Stud Am Political Dev 27(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo M, Roberds W (2013) The origins, history, and future of the Federal Reserve: a return to Jekyll Island. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Broesamle JJ (1973) William Gibbs McAdoo: a passion for change, 1863–1917. Kennikat Press, Port Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown DM (1930) Review: bankers’ balances by Leonard Watkins. J Polit Econ 38(4):493–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler LV (1958) Benjamin strong: central banker. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott MC (1914) Report of Secretary. RBOC (Records of the Federal Reserve System, Record Group 82). Technical report, National Archives II, College Park, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Reserve Board (1915) The redistricting decision. Fed Reserve Bull 1(2):85–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Reserve Board (1959) All-bank statistics. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerena C (2007) Federal Reserve: a division of power. Fed Reserve Bank Richmond Reg Focus 11(2):2–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildea JA (1992) The regional representation of Federal Reserve bank presidents. J Money Credit Bank 24(2):215–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass C (1927) An adventure in constructive finance. Doubleday, Page & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammes D (2001) Locating Federal Reserve districts and headquarters cities. Region 15(3):24–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Havrilesky T (1995) The pressures on American monetary policy. Kluwer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckelman JC, Wood JH (2008) Joint determination of regulations by the regulator and the regulated: commercial bank reserve requirements, 1875–1979. East Econ J 34(2):158–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston DF (1926) Eight years with Wilson’s cabinet, 1913 to 1920. Doubleday, Page & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaremski M, Wheelock DC (2017) Banker preferences, interbank connections, and the enduring structure of the Federal Reserve system. Explor Econ Hist 66(4):21–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolko G (2008) Triumph of conservatism: a reinterpretation of American history, 1900–1916. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lown CS, Wood JH (2003) The determination of commercial bank reserve requirements. Rev Financ Econ 12(1):83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason DL (2004) From buildings and loans to bail-outs: a history of the American savings and loan industry, 1831–1995. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdoo WG (1931) Crowded years: the reminiscences of William G. McAdoo. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • McAvoy MR (2006) How were the Federal Reserve bank locations selected? Explor Econ Hist 43(3):505–526

    Google Scholar 

  • McAvoy MR (2012) Bankers preferences and locating Federal Reserve bank locations. Essays Econ Bus Hist 22(1):143–169

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley V (2012) Financing failure: a century of bailouts. Independent Institute, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Genc I (2002) A regional analysis of Federal Reserve districts. Ann Reg Sci 36(1):123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odell KA, Weiman DF (1998) Metropolitan development, regional financial centers, and the founding of the Fed in the lower South. J Econ Hist 58(1):103–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed HL (1922) The development of Federal Reserve policy. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank Organization Committee (1914a) Hearings on Federal Reserve district divisions and location of Federal Reserve banks and head offices: January 5–February 17. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank Organization Committee (1914b) Decision of the Reserve Bank Organization Committee determining the Federal Reserve districts and the location of Federal Reserve banks under Federal Reserve Act: April 2. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank Organization Committee (1914c) First-choice vote for reserve-bank cities. House Doc. 1134, 63rd Congress, 2nd session

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockoff H (2003) How long did it take the United States to become an optimal currency area. In: Capie FH, Wood GE (eds) Monetary unions: theory, history, public choice. Routledge, New York, pp 76–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer CD, Romer DH (2013) The most dangerous idea in Federal Reserve history: monetary policy doesn’t matter. Am Econ Rev 103(3):55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz AJ (1992) The misuse of the Fed’s discount window. Fed Reserve Bank St Louis Rev 74(5):58–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Selgin G, Lastrapes WD, White LH (2012) Has the Fed been a failure? J Macroecon 34(3):569–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague OMW (1910) History of crises under the national banking system. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton H (1802) An enquiry into the nature and effects of the paper credit of Great Britain. Hatchard, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake RH (1978) The origins of central banking in the United States. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • US Congress (1913) Congressional Record. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US Congress (1914) Congressional Record. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburg PM (1930) The Federal Reserve system: its origin and growth. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins LL (1929) Bankers’ balances: a study of the effects of the Federal Reserve System on banking relationships. AW Shaw Company, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyforth WO (1933) The Federal Reserve Board: a study of Federal Reserve structure and credit control. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • White EN (2013) “To Establish A More Effective Supervision of Banking”: how the birth of the Fed altered bank supervision. In: Bordo MD, Roberds W (eds) The origins, history, and future of the Federal Reserve. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wicker E (2005) The great debate on banking reform: Nelson Aldrich and the origins of the Fed. Ohio State University Press, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis HP (1923) The Federal Reserve system. Ronald Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood JH (2005) A history of central banking in Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood JH (2015) Central Banking in a democracy: the Federal Reserve and its alternatives. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jac C. Heckelman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heckelman, J.C., Wood, J.H. (2018). Political Selection of Federal Reserve Bank Cities. In: Hall, J., Witcher, M. (eds) Public Choice Analyses of American Economic History. Studies in Public Choice, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77592-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics