Skip to main content

The Use of Writing as a Metacognitive Tool in Geometry Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 819 Accesses

Part of the book series: ICME-13 Monographs ((ICME13Mo))

Abstract

This work reports on a teaching intervention that explored the use of writing as a metacognitive tool in high school geometry problem solving. Specifically, this qualitative research study investigated how explicit writing directives can help students understand, organize, and monitor the steps involved in the different phases of activities for geometry problem solving in the third year of secondary school . Possible gains of the intervention are assessed by comparing the performance of students who participated of the intervention with that of students who did not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henning, E., Gravett, S., & van Resburg, W. (2002). Finding your way in academic writing. Cape Town: Van Schaick Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, A. A. (2006). Comprehending math adapting reading strategies to teach mathematics, K-6. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, A., & Hyde, P. (1991). Mathwise: Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretaría de Educación Pública. (2013a). Invitación a las Olimpiada Estatal de Educación Primaria y Secundaria [Invitation to the State Olympics for Elementary and Secondary Education]. Available at: http://portalsej.jalisco.gob.mx/sites/default/files/cuadernillo_secundaria_2013.pdf.

  • Secretaría de Educación Pública. (2013b). Invitación a las Olimpiada Estatal de Educación Primaria y Secundaria [Invitation to the State Olympics for Elementary and Secondary Education]. Available at: http://portalsej.jalisco.gob.mx/cuarta-olimpiada-estatal-de-matematicas-en-educacion-primaria-y-secundaria.

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Metacognitive and epistemological issues in mathematical understanding. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 361–379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multi-method designs? In C. Artelt & B. Moschner (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 75–97). Berlin: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J. (2006). Self-questioning as a metacognitive skill. In H. Pedrosa de Jesus & H. van der Meij (Eds.), Research on Questioning. Aveiro: University of Aveiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J. (2007). The assessment and instruction of self-regulation in computer-based environments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 177–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J. (2011). Learning to self-monitor and self-regulate. In R. Mayer & P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 197–218). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Definitions, constituents, and their intricate relation with cognition. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education (Vol. 40, pp. 21–36). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6_2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J., Bernadette, H. A. M., Hout-Wolters, V., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning, 1, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luz Graciela Orozco Vaca .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Orozco Vaca, L.G. (2018). The Use of Writing as a Metacognitive Tool in Geometry Learning. In: Herbst, P., Cheah, U., Richard, P., Jones, K. (eds) International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Geometry in Secondary Schools. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77476-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77476-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77475-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77476-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics