Skip to main content

Freedom and Schizophrenia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Self and Social Relations
  • 214 Accesses

Abstract

I end here with a brief argument to show the connection of the holistic conception of the individual with an account of mental crisis and schizophrenia. This chapter is included to show that our attempts at forming coherent self-descriptions, as part of an ongoing project of self-realisation, do not always proceed smoothly. On the contrary, these attempts often result not in autonomy but in alienation and mental crisis. It attempts to point out a line of continuity between healthy but struggling individuals and schizophrenics that might help us sympathise with and better understand their plight as a thoroughly human one. It is also included to show the potential of the ideas outlined here for further fruitful interdisciplinary applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Laing (1965), 78.

  2. 2.

    Ibid., 17.

  3. 3.

    Szasz is an excellent critic working in this tradition. However, his critique is too one sided, seemingly denying any reality to the notion of ‘mental illness’. See Szasz (1974, 2008).

  4. 4.

    Laing (1965), 24.

  5. 5.

    Ibid., 19.

  6. 6.

    I do not wish to sound naive regarding the role of biology in human mentality. It would be as much of a mistake to overemphasise the social dimension of mind as to overemphasise the biological dimension. For a sensitive treatment of various mental ailments that aims to incorporate both biological and social dimensions, see Gillett (2009).

  7. 7.

    Winfield (1983), 174.

  8. 8.

    Though some lines of commitment may risk coming into conflict, they may never in fact do so. For this reason identities of varying degrees of unity also exhibit varying degrees of precariousness.

  9. 9.

    The question as to whether or not I am realising myself cannot be all or nothing, it must be a question of degree.

  10. 10.

    I do not, of course, wish to dismiss the aspect of freedom which requires minimising interference to some suitable degree. See Chap. 1.

  11. 11.

    Berlin (2002), 188.

  12. 12.

    Laing charts in some detail the conflicted and confused interpersonal relationships that often exist within the family life alone, and which give rise to painful self-conceptions, via an exploration of numerous patient and patient-family interviews. See Laing and Esterson (1990).

  13. 13.

    Taylor (1989), 27.

  14. 14.

    Laing has written a series of ‘poems’ which try to give expression to the various knots we tie ourselves into when trying to form conceptions of a situation and of ourselves within those situations. See Laing (1972).

  15. 15.

    For an illuminating and touching exploration of a schizophrenic individual’s relation to his schizophrenic society, see Wilson (1992), 117. Hilde Lindemann Nelson has offered an illuminating account of narrative identity, with careful attention paid to the stories we tell about subjugated groups, including women, mothers, gypsies and transsexuals, and the oppression these stories create. See Nelson (2001).

  16. 16.

    I believe that something like this is what Freud is trying to work out in some of his work. See Freud (2004).

  17. 17.

    Ibid., 101.

  18. 18.

    I am wary of being misunderstood on this point. The term ‘responsible’ may have layers of meaning that can be picked apart. To be responsible necessarily involves engaging one’s agency in some way, but it need not always involve that further aspect, the aspect that tends to charge a person with being guilty, or punishable, or the suitable target of unkind words and so on. I only wish to make sure that the subject’s agency is not lost here. See Pickard and Ward (2013).

  19. 19.

    Nelson talks about communities of choice as a means to this sort of end. See Nelson (2001).

  20. 20.

    Trilling (1995) quoted in Laing (1965), 40.

  21. 21.

    Ibid, 42.

  22. 22.

    Ibid, 52–53.

  23. 23.

    Ibid, 69.

  24. 24.

    See Chap. 3 of this work.

  25. 25.

    Hegel (1991), 38.

  26. 26.

    Laing (1965), 141.

  27. 27.

    Ibid., 139.

  28. 28.

    Ibid., 133.

Bibliography

  • Berlin, Isaiah. 2002. Two Concepts of Liberty. In Liberty, ed. Henry Hardy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund. 2004. Civilization and Its Discontents. Trans. David McLintock. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, Grant. 2009. The Mind and Its Discontents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F., ed. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Trans. H.B. Nisbet, ed. Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, R.D. 1965. The Divided Self. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1972. Knots. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, R.D., and A. Esterson. 1990. Sanity, Madness and the Family. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Hilde Lindemann. 2001. Damaged Identities, Narrative Repair. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, Hannah, and Lisa Ward. 2013. Responsibility Without Blame: Philosophical Reflections on Clinical Practice. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, Thomas. 1974. The Myth of Mental Illness. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Psychiatry: The Science of Lies. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, Lionel. 1995. The Opposing Self. London: Secker & Warburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Peter J. 1992. Oscar: An Inquiry into the Nature of Sanity? Long Grove: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, Richard D. 1983. Freedom as Interaction: Hegel’s Resolution to the Dilemma of Liberal Theory. In Hegel’s Philosophy of Action, ed. Lawrence S. Stepelevich and David Lamb. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Whittingham, M. (2018). Freedom and Schizophrenia. In: The Self and Social Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77246-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics