Abstract
Intraoperative navigation in its present form is the result of technical advances that have taken place over more than three decades. These started with the need to find anatomical targets accurately, to define surgical pathways without harming neighboring structures and, especially in cranio-maxillofacial surgery, to intraoperatively control the position of bony structures and implants. The introduction of navigation has resulted in a paradigm shift: surgical procedures must be planned preoperatively based on medical three-dimensional (3D) imaging, and the desired outcome must be defined in advance. After registering the patient’s anatomy with 3D imaging and devising a preoperative plan, navigation can be applied until the preplanned outcome is achieved. Quality assessment includes evaluation of intraoperative or postoperative 3D images and the virtual surgical plan.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ambrose J, Hounsfield G. Computerized transverse axial tomography. Br J Radiol. 1973;46(542):148–9.
Andrews JC, et al. Stereolithographic model construction from CT for assessment and surgical planning in congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol. 1994;15(3):335–9.
Banks J. Adding value in additive manufacturing: researchers in the United Kingdom and Europe look to 3D printing for customization. IEEE Pulse. 2013;4(6):22–6.
Bell RB. Computer planning and intraoperative navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010;22(1):135–56.
Blumer M, et al. Influence of mirrored computed tomograms on decision-making for revising surgically treated orbital floor fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(10):1982.e1–9.
Donlon WC, Young P, Vassiliadis A. Three-dimensional computed tomography for maxillofacial surgery: report of cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;46(2):142–7.
Dubois L, et al. Predictability in orbital reconstruction. A human cadaver study, part III: Implant-oriented navigation for optimized reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015a;43(10):2050–6.
Dubois L, et al. Predictability in orbital reconstruction: A human cadaver study. Part II: Navigation-assisted orbital reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015b;43(10):2042–9.
Eggers G, Muhling J, Marmulla R. Image-to-patient registration techniques in head surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35(12):1081–95.
Ellis E. Intraoperative CT scanning in maxillofacial trauma: what is its role? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:e5.
Essig H, et al. Virtual 3D tumor marking-exact intraoperative coordinate mapping improve post-operative radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2011;6:159.
Essig H, et al. Referencing of markerless CT data sets with cone beam subvolume including registration markers to ease computer-assisted surgery - a clinical and technical research. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9(3):e39–45.
Essig H, et al. Patient-specific biodegradable implant in pediatric craniofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(2):216–22.
Eufinger H, et al. Single-step fronto-orbital resection and reconstruction with individual resection template and corresponding titanium implant: a new method of computer-aided surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998;26(6):373–8.
Ewers R, et al. [Occlusal splint for the transmission, fixation and control of planned bite relations in progenia operations]. ZWR. 1977;86(12):630–2.
Gellrich NC, et al. Computer-assisted secondary reconstruction of unilateral posttraumatic orbital deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(6):1417–29.
Hassfeld S, Muhling J, Zoller J. Intraoperative navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;24(1 Pt 2):111–9.
Heissler E, et al. Custom-made cast titanium implants produced with CAD/CAM for the reconstruction of cranium defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;27(5):334–8.
Hinzpeter R, et al. Imaging algorithms and CT protocols in trauma patients: survey of Swiss emergency centers. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(5):1922–8.
Hoffmann J, et al. Validation of 3D-laser surface registration for image-guided cranio-maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2005;33(1):13–8.
Kermer C, et al. Preoperative stereolithographic model planning for primary reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial trauma surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998;26(3):136–9.
Kosugi Y, et al. An articulated neurosurgical navigation system using MRI and CT images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35(2):147–52.
Leksell L. The stereotaxic method and radiosurgery of the brain. Acta Chir Scand. 1951;102(4):316–9.
Luebbers HT, et al. Comparison of different registration methods for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36(2):109–16.
Mankovich NJ, Cheeseman AM, Stoker NG. The display of three-dimensional anatomy with stereolithographic models. J Digit Imaging. 1990;3(3):200–3.
Marmulla R, et al. [Precision of computer-assisted systems in profile reconstructive interventions on the face]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1997;1(Suppl 1):S65–7.
Marsh JL, Vannier MW. The “third” dimension in craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71(6):759–67.
Metzger MC, et al. Comparison of 4 registration strategies for computer-aided maxillofacial surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(1):93–9.
Mezger U, Jendrewski C, Bartels M. Navigation in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013;398(4):501–14.
Paraskevopoulos D, et al. Comparative study of application accuracy of two frameless neuronavigation systems: experimental error assessment quantifying registration methods and clinically influencing factors. Neurosurg Rev. 2010;34(2):217–28.
Roscoe L. Stereolithography interface specification. America-3D Systems Inc.; 1988. p. 27.
Santler G, et al. Stereolithography versus milled three-dimensional models: comparison of production method, indication, and accuracy. Comput Aided Surg. 1998;3(5):248–56.
Schmelzeisen R, et al. Navigation-aided reconstruction of medial orbital wall and floor contour in cranio-maxillofacial reconstruction. Injury. 2004;35(10):955–62.
Schwestka R, et al. Control of vertical position of the maxilla in orthognathic surgery: clinical application of the sandwich splint. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1990;5(2):133–6.
Spiegel EA, et al. Stereotaxic apparatus for operations on the human brain. Science. 1947;106(2754):349–50.
Villalobos H, Germano IM. Clinical evaluation of multimodality registration in frameless stereotaxy. Comput Aided Surg. 1999;4(1):45–9.
Wagner M, Essig H. Intraoperative 3-D-Bildgebung als Ergänzung oder Ersatz der intraoperativen Navigation? Der MKG-Chirurg. 2017;10(3):190–6.
Wagner ME, et al. Development and first clinical application of automated virtual reconstruction of unilateral midface defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(8):1340–7.
Watzinger F, et al. Computer-aided navigation in secondary reconstruction of post-traumatic deformities of the zygoma. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1997;25(4):198–202.
Widmann G, et al. Use of a surgical navigation system for CT-guided template production. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(1):72–8.
Zachow S. Computational planning in facial surgery. Facial Plast Surg. 2015;31(5):446–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Essig, H. (2019). Intraoperative Navigation: Techniques and Systems in Craniofacial Trauma. In: Hardt, N., Kessler, P., Kuttenberger, J. (eds) Craniofacial Trauma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77210-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77210-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77209-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77210-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)