Skip to main content

Tattoo Removal: Techniques and Devices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dermatologic Complications with Body Art

Abstract

About one in five of the tattooed individuals regrets their tattoo(s) and considers removal. Some make an unwise decision and try chemical and thermal methods which mostly result in permanent disfiguring scars. Nowadays treatment with specific lasers offers the best solution. Q-switched lasers have become the first choice. However, laser tattoo removal is painful, tedious, expensive, and not always successful. To avoid dissatisfaction, good knowledge of the devices and patient selection is needed. Professional advice, correct information of the potential side effects, and good aftercare are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Burris K, Kim K (2007) Tattoo removal. Clin Dermatol 25:388–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Strong AM, Jackson IT (1979) The removal of amateur tattoos by salabrasion. Br J Dermatol 101:693–696

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kilmer S, Fitzpatrick R (2008) Tattoo lasers. http://www.emedicine.com/derm/topic563.html. Accessed 25 June 2008

  4. Sepehri M, Jorgensen B, Serup J (2015) Introduction of dermatome shaving as first line treatment of chronic tattoo reactions. J Dermatolog Treat 26:451–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Naeyaert C, De Cuyper C (2013) Rood Pigment de grote boosdoener in Tattoos. Ned Tijdschr Dermatol Venerol 29:563–564

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wollina U, Kostler E (2007) Tattoos: surgical removal. Clin Dermatol 25:393–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sepehri M, Jorgensen B (2017) Surgical treatment of tattoo complications. Curr Probl Dermatol 52:82–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Piggot TA, Norris RW (1988) The treatment of tattoos with trichloroacetic acid: experience with 670 patients. Br J Plast Surg 41:112–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kluger N (2015) The risks of do-it-yourself and over-the-counter devices for tattoo removal. Int J Dermatol 54:13–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wollina U (2015) Depigmentation and hypertrophic scars after application of a fluid lactic acid tattoo eraser. Wien Med Wochenschr 165:195–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kluger N, Koljonen V (2014) Chemical burn and hypertrophic scar due to misuse of a wart ointment for tattoo removal. Int J Dermatol 53:e9–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Z, Zhang H, Li SH et al (2016) Fatal phenol toxicity following attempted tattoo removal. J Forensic Sci 61:1143–1145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saini R, Winhoven SM, Kaufman J (2008) Hypertrophic scar after chemical tattoo removal. Dermatol Surg 34:1599–1602

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Serup J (2017) Atlas of illustrative cases of tattoo complications. Curr Probl Dermatol 52:139–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Colver GB (1989) The infrared coagulator in dermatology. Dermatol Clin 7:155–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Manstein D, Herron GS, Sink RK et al (2004) Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Lasers Surg Med 34:426–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibrahimi OA, Syed Z, Sakamoto FH et al (2011) Treatment of tattoo allergy with ablative fractional resurfacing: a novel paradigm for tattoo removal. J Am Acad Dermatol 64:1111–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meesters AA, De Rie MA, Wolkerstorfer A (2016) Generalized eczematous reaction after fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy for tattoo allergy. J Cosmet Laser Ther 18:456–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vanarase M, Gautam RK, Arora P et al (2017) Comparison of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone versus its combination with ultrapulse CO2 laser for the treatment of black tattoo. J Cosmet Laser Ther 19(5):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson RR, Geronemus R, Kilmer SL et al (1993) Cosmetic tattoo ink darkening. A complication of Q-switched and pulsed-laser treatment. Arch Dermatol 129:1010–1014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mafong EA, Kauvar AN, Geronemus RG (2003) Surgical pearl: removal of cosmetic lip-liner tattoo with the pulsed carbon dioxide laser. J Am Acad Dermatol 48:271–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Solis RR, Diven DG, Colome-Grimmer MI et al (2002) Experimental nonsurgical tattoo removal in a guinea pig model with topical imiquimod and tretinoin. Dermatol Surg 28:83–86, discussion 86–87

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramirez M, Magee N, Diven D et al (2007) Topical imiquimod as an adjuvant to laser removal of mature tattoos in an animal model. Dermatol Surg 33:319–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Elsaie ML, Nouri K, Vejjabhinanta V et al (2009) Topical imiquimod in conjunction with Nd:YAG laser for tattoo removal. Lasers Med Sci 24:871–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ricotti CA, Colaco SM, Shamma HN et al (2007) Laser-assisted tattoo removal with topical 5% imiquimod cream. Dermatol Surg 33:1082–1091

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cozzi SJ, Le TT, Ogbourne SM et al (2017) Tattoo removal with ingenol mebutate. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 10:205–210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson RR, Parrish JA (1983) Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science 220:524–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Adatto MA, Halachmi S, Lapidoth M (2011) Tattoo removal. Curr Probl Dermatol 42:97–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Beute TC, Miller CH, Timko AL et al (2008) In vitro spectral analysis of tattoo pigments. Dermatol Surg 34:508–515, discussion 515–516

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Parrish JA, Anderson RR, Harrist T et al (1983) Selective thermal effects with pulsed irradiation from lasers: from organ to organelle. J Invest Dermatol 80(Suppl):75s–80s

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldman L, Wilson RG, Hornby P et al (1965) Radiation from a Q-switched ruby laser. Effect of repeated impacts of power output of 10 megawatts on a tattoo of man. J Invest Dermatol 44:69–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kilmer SL (2002) Laser eradication of pigmented lesions and tattoos. Dermatol Clin 20:37–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor CR, Gange RW, Dover JS et al (1990) Treatment of tattoos by Q-switched ruby laser. A dose-response study. Arch Dermatol 126:893–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grevelink JM, Duke D, Van Leeuwen RL et al (1996) Laser treatment of tattoos in darkly pigmented patients: efficacy and side effects. J Am Acad Dermatol 34:653–656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jacques SL (1993) Role of tissue optics and pulse duration on tissue effects during high-power laser irradiation. Appl Opt 32:2447–2454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Adatto MA, Amir R, Bhawalkar J et al (2017) New and advanced picosecond lasers for tattoo removal. Curr Probl Dermatol 52:113–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ross V, Naseef G, Lin G et al (1998) Comparison of responses of tattoos to picosecond and nanosecond Q-switched neodymium: YAG lasers. Arch Dermatol 134:167–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ho DD, London R, Zimmerman GB et al (2002) Laser-tattoo removal--a study of the mechanism and the optimal treatment strategy via computer simulations. Lasers Surg Med 30:389–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pinto F, Grosse-Buning S, Karsai S et al (2017) Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064-nm picosecond laser vs. Nd:YAG 1064-nm nanosecond laser in tattoo removal: a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial. Br J Dermatol 176:457–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Alabdulrazzaq H, Brauer JA, Bae YS et al (2015) Clearance of yellow tattoo ink with a novel 532-nm picosecond laser. Lasers Surg Med 47:285–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bernstein EF, Schomacker KT, Basilavecchio LD et al (2015) A novel dual-wavelength, Nd:YAG, picosecond-domain laser safely and effectively removes multicolor tattoos. Lasers Surg Med 47(7):539–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Brauer JA, Reddy KK, Anolik R et al (2012) Successful and rapid treatment of blue and green tattoo pigment with a novel picosecond laser. Arch Dermatol 148:820–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Saedi N, Metelitsa A, Petrell K et al (2012) Treatment of tattoos with a picosecond alexandrite laser: a prospective trial. Arch Dermatol 148:1360–1363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bae YS, Alabdulrazzaq H, Brauer J et al (2016) Successful treatment of paradoxical darkening. Lasers Surg Med 48:471–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim HR, Shin JM, Lee JH et al (2017) Primary cutaneous Aspergillosis after tattoo removal using a 1,064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in an immunocompetent patient. Ann Dermatol 29:241–243

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Friedmann DP, Mishra V, Buckley S (2017) Keloidal scarring from the at-home use of intense pulsed light for tattoo removal. Dermatol Surg 43(8):1112–1114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hammes S, Karsai S, Metelmann HR et al (2013) Treatment errors resulting from use of lasers and IPL by medical laypersons: results of a nationwide survey. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 11:149–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Radmanesh M, Rafiei Z (2015) Combination of CO2 and Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers is more effective than Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone for eyebrow tattoo removal. J Cosmet Laser Ther 17:65–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sardana K, Ranjan R, Kochhar AM et al (2015) A rapid tattoo removal technique using a combination of pulsed Er:YAG and Q-switched Nd:YAG in a split lesion protocol. J Cosmet Laser Ther 17:177–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sardana K, Garg VK, Bansal S et al (2013) A promising split-lesion technique for rapid tattoo removal using a novel sequential approach of a single sitting of pulsed CO(2) followed by Q-switched Nd: YAG laser (1064 nm). J Cosmet Dermatol 12:296–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hutton CK, Esmann J, Serup J (2017) Laser surgeon, client education, and satisfaction with tattoo removal. Curr Probl Dermatol 52:124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bunert N, Homey B, Gerber PA (2014) Successful treatment of a professional tattoo with the R20 method. Hautarzt 65:853–855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kossida T, Rigopoulos D, Katsambas A et al (2012) Optimal tattoo removal in a single laser session based on the method of repeated exposures. J Am Acad Dermatol 66:271–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Biesman BS, Costner C (2017) Evaluation of a transparent perfluorodecalin-infused patch as an adjunct to laser-assisted tattoo removal: a pivotal trial. Lasers Surg Med 49:335–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Zelickson BD, Mehregan DA, Zarrin AA et al (1994) Clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural evaluation of tattoos treated with three laser systems. Lasers Surg Med 15:364–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Karsai S, Krieger G, Raulin C (2010) Tattoo removal by non-professionals—medical and forensic considerations. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 24:756–762

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Schreiver I, Hutzler C, Laux P et al (2015) Formation of highly toxic hydrogen cyanide upon ruby laser irradiation of the tattoo pigment phthalocyanine blue. Sci Rep 5:1291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Eklund Y, Rubin AT (2015) Laser tattoo removal, precautions, and unwanted effects. Curr Probl Dermatol 48:88–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wilken R, Ho D, Petukhova T et al (2015) Intraoperative localized urticarial reaction during Q-switched Nd:YAG laser tattoo removal. J Drugs Dermatol 14:303–306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Willardson HB, Kobayashi TT, Arnold JG et al (2017) Diffuse urticarial reaction associated with titanium dioxide following laser tattoo removal treatments. Photomed Laser Surg 35:176–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hibler BP, Rossi AM (2015) A case of delayed anaphylaxis after laser tattoo removal. JAAD Case Rep 1:80–81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Yorulmaz A, Onan DT, Artuz F et al (2015) A case of generalized allergic contact dermatitis after laser tattoo removal. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 34:234–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Bernstein EF (2015) A widespread allergic reaction to black tattoo ink caused by laser treatment. Lasers Surg Med 47:180–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Ashinoff R, Levine VJ, Soter NA (1995) Allergic reactions to tattoo pigment after laser treatment. Dermatol Surg 21:291–294

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Geist DE, Phillips TJ (2006) Development of chrysiasis after Q-switched ruby laser treatment of solar lentigines. J Am Acad Dermatol 55:S59–S60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Fusade T, Toubel G, Grognard C et al (2000) Treatment of gunpowder traumatic tattoo by Q-switched Nd:YAG laser: an unusual adverse effect. Dermatol Surg 26:1057–1059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Izikson L, Avram M, Anderson RR (2008) Transient immunoreactivity after laser tattoo removal: report of two cases. Lasers Surg Med 40:231–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Bernstein EF (2007) Laser tattoo removal. Semin Plast Surg 21:175–192

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Laux P, Tralau T, Tentschert J et al (2016) A medical-toxicological view of tattooing. Lancet 387:395–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Vasold R, Engel E, Konig B et al (2008) Health risks of tattoo colors. Anal Bioanal Chem 391:9–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Vasold R, Naarmann N, Ulrich H et al (2004) Tattoo pigments are cleaved by laser light-the chemical analysis in vitro provide evidence for hazardous compounds. Photochem Photobiol 80:185–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Karsai S (2017) Removal of tattoos by Q-switched nanosecond lasers. Curr Probl Dermatol 52:105–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Dr. Bieke Heykants, Da Vinci Clinic, Beerse, Belgium (film picosecond)

Dr. Els Wittouck, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende, Belgium

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelien Verhaeghe M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

8.1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Video 8.1

Laser tattoo removal. Part 1 laser tattoo removal black panther; Dr. De Cuyper, Dr. Wittouck. Part 2 laser tattoo removal by Bieke Heykants: picosecond laser to treat spontaneous darkening of a nipple-areola tattoo. Part 3 laser tattoo removal, black tattoo; Dr. Verhaeghe, Dr. De Cuyper (MP4 119770 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Verhaeghe, E., De Cuyper, C. (2018). Tattoo Removal: Techniques and Devices. In: De Cuyper, C., Pérez-Cotapos S, M. (eds) Dermatologic Complications with Body Art. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77098-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77098-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77097-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77098-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics