Abstract
This chapter provides a framework for using public procurement of innovation to trigger servitization with environmental goals. The research builds upon several cases of Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) in the Canary Islands, showing different scenarios faced by public procurers concerning energy services. The framework suggests four stages to help the public sector to overcome barriers toward performance procurement and to choose the most beneficial set of ESCOs services. At the same time, the tool can be useful for managers interested in competing in public tenders and defining the most adequate bundle of products, services, and outcomes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bertoldi, P., & Boza-Kiss, B. (2017). Analysis of barriers and drivers for the development of the ESCO markets in Europe. Energy Policy, 107(April), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.023
Bolton, R., & Hannon, M. (2016). Governing sustainability transitions through business model innovation: Towards a systems understanding. Research Policy, 45(9), 1731–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.003
Caloghirou, Y., Protogerou, A., & Panagiotopoulos, P. (2016). Public procurement for innovation: A novel eGovernment services scheme in Greek local authorities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.016
Carbonara, N., & Pellegrino, R. (2018). Public-private partnerships for energy efficiency projects: A win-win model to choose the energy performance contracting structure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1064–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.151
Edquist, C., Vonortas, N., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., & Edler, J. (2015). Public procurement for innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
EPA. (2009). “Green Servicizing” for a more sustainable US Economy. Key concepts, tools and analyses to inform policy engagement. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/wastes/conserve/tools/stewardship/docs/green-service.pdf
Gobierno de las Islas Canarias. (2015). Proyecto de mejora de la eficiencia energética y prestación de servicios energéticos. Gran Canaria: Gobierno de las Islas Canarias.
Hannon, M. J., Foxon, T. J., & Gale, W. F. (2015). “Demand pull” government policies to support product-service system activity: The case of Energy Service Companies (ESCos) in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.082
Lember, V., Kalvet, T., & Kattel, R. (2011). Urban competitiveness and public procurement for innovation. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1373–1395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010374512
Painuly, J. P., Park, H., Lee, M. K., & Noh, J. (2003). Promoting energy efficiency financing and ESCOs in developing countries: Mechanisms and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(6), 659–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00111-7
Pätäri, S., Annala, S., Jantunen, A., Viljainen, S., & Sinkkonen, A. (2016). Enabling and hindering factors of diffusion of energy service companies in Finland? Results of a Delphi study. Energy Efficiency, 2010, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9433-z
Polzin, F., von Flotow, P., & Nolden, C. (2016). What encourages local authorities to engage with energy performance contracting for retrofitting? Evidence from German municipalities. Energy Policy, 94, 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.049
Rabetino, R., Kohtamäki, M., & Gebauer, H. (2017). Strategy map of servitization. International Journal of Production Economics, 192, 144–156.
Rolfstam, M. (2013). Public procurement and innovation: The role of institutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Roshchanka, V., & Evans, M. (2016). Scaling up the energy service company business: Market status and company feedback in the Russian Federation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3905–3914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.078
Rothenberg, S. (2007). Sustainability through servicizing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 82–91.
Stahel, W. R. (2010). The performance economy (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Testa, F., Annunziata, E., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2016). Drawbacks and opportunities of green public procurement: An effective tool for sustainable production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1893–1900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.092
Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.414
Uyarra, E., Edler, J., Garcia-Estevez, J., Georghiou, L., & Yeow, J. (2014). Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective. Technovation, 34(10), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.003
Vine, E. (2005). An international survey of the energy service company ESCO industry. Energy Policy, 33(5), 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.09.014
Zelenbabic, D. (2015). Fostering innovation through innovation friendly procurement practices: A case study of Danish local government procurement. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 261–281.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peñate-Valentín, M.C., Pereira, Á., Sánchez-Carreira, M.d.C. (2018). Servitization in the Public Sector: A Framework for Energy Service Companies. In: Kohtamäki, M., Baines, T., Rabetino, R., Bigdeli, A. (eds) Practices and Tools for Servitization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76517-4_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76517-4_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76516-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76517-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)