Skip to main content

Narrowing the Gap Between QoS Metrics and Web QoE Using Above-the-fold Metrics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCCN,volume 10771))

Abstract

Page load time (PLT) is still the most common application Quality of Service (QoS) metric to estimate the Quality of Experience (QoE) of Web users . Yet, recent literature abounds with proposals for alternative metrics (e.g., Above The Fold, SpeedIndex and their variants) that aim at better estimating user QoE. The main purpose of this work is thus to thoroughly investigate a mapping between established and recently proposed objective metrics and user QoE. We obtain ground truth QoE via user experiments where we collect and analyze 3,400 Web accesses annotated with QoS metrics and explicit user ratings in a scale of 1 to 5, which we make available to the community. In particular, we contrast domain expert models (such as ITU-T and IQX) fed with a single QoS metric, to models trained using our ground-truth dataset over multiple QoS metrics as features. Results of our experiments show that, albeit very simple, expert models have a comparable accuracy to machine learning approaches. Furthermore, the model accuracy improves considerably when building per-page QoE models, which may raise scalability concerns as we discuss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.webpagetest.org/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.w3.org/TR/navigation-timing/.

References

  1. https://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.fr/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html

  2. http://googleresearch.blogspot.fr/2009/06/speed-matters.html

  3. https://sites.google.com/a/webpagetest.org/docs/using-webpagetest/metrics/speed-index

  4. Alexa Internet Inc. http://www.alexa.com

  5. Approximate ATF chrome extension. https://github.com/TeamRossi/ATF

  6. Bampis, C.G., Bovik, A.C.: Learning to predict streaming video QoE: distortions, rebuffering and memory. CoRR, abs/1703.00633 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Belshe, M., Peon, R., et al.: Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2 (HTTP/2). RFC 7540 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bocchi, E., De Cicco, L., et al.: Measuring the quality of experience of web users. In: ACM SIGCOMM CCR (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bocchi, E., De Cicco, L., Mellia, M., Rossi, D.: The web, the users, and the MOS: influence of HTTP/2 on user experience. In: Kaafar, M.A., Uhlig, S., Amann, J. (eds.) PAM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10176, pp. 47–59. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54328-4_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Brutlag, J., Abrams, Z., et al.: Above the fold time: Measuring web page performance visually (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Butkiewicz, M., Madhyastha, H.V., et al.: Characterizing web page complexity and its impact. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 22(3), 943 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Charonyktakis, P., Plakia, M., et al.: On user-centric modular QoE prediction for VoIP based on machine-learning algorithms. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 15, 1443–1456 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Erman, J., Gopalakrishnan, V., et al.: Towards a SPDY’ier mobile web? In: ACM CoNEXT, pp. 303–314 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fiedler, M., Hoßfeld, T., et al.: A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service. IEEE Netw. 24(2), 36 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao, Q., Dey, P., et al.: Perceived performance of top retail webpages in the wild: insights from large-scale crowdsourcing of above-the-fold QoE. In: Proceedings of ACM Internet-QoE Workshop (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Google: SPDY, an experimental protocol for a faster web. https://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper

  17. ITU-T: Estimating end-to-end performance in IP networks for data application (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kelton, C., Ryoo, J., et al.: Improving user perceived page load time using gaze. In: Proceedings of USENIX NSDI (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Langley, A., Riddoch, A., et al.: The QUIC transport protocol: design and internet-scale deployment. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Minutes of TPAC Web Performance WG meeting. https://www.w3.org/2016/09/23-webperf-minutes.html

  21. Qian, F., Gopalakrishnan, V., et al.: TM3: flexible transport-layer multi-pipe multiplexing middlebox without head-of-line blocking. In: ACM CoNEXT (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schatz, R., Hoßfeld, T., Janowski, L., Egger, S.: From packets to people: quality of experience as a new measurement challenge. In: Biersack, E., Callegari, C., Matijasevic, M. (eds.) Data Traffic Monitoring and Analysis. LNCS, vol. 7754, pp. 219–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36784-7_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Spetebroot, T., Afra, S., et al.: From network-level measurements to expected quality of experience: the Skype use case. In: M & N Workshop (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Varvello, M., Blackburn, J., et al.: EYEORG: a platform for crowdsourcing web quality of experience measurements. In: Proceedings of ACM CoNEXT (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Varvello, M., Schomp, K., et al.: Is The Web HTTP/2 Yet?. In: Proceedings of PAM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, X.S., Balasubramanian, A., et al.: How speedy is SPDY? In: USENIX NSDI, pp. 387–399. USENIX Association, Seattle (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, X.S., Krishnamurthy, A., et al.: Speeding up web page loads with Shandian. In: USENIX NSDI (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Web QoE dataset. https://newnet.telecom-paristech.fr/index.php/webqoe/

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to our shepherd Mike Wittie and to the anonymous reviewers, whose useful comments helped us improving our work. This work has been carried out at LINCS (http://www.lincs.fr) and benefited from support of NewNet@Paris, Ciscos Chair “Networks for the Future” at Telecom ParisTech and the EU Marie curie ITN program METRICS (grant no. 607728).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Neves da Hora .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

da Hora, D.N., Asrese, A.S., Christophides, V., Teixeira, R., Rossi, D. (2018). Narrowing the Gap Between QoS Metrics and Web QoE Using Above-the-fold Metrics. In: Beverly, R., Smaragdakis, G., Feldmann, A. (eds) Passive and Active Measurement. PAM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10771. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76481-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76481-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76480-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76481-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics