Abstract
The authors put a much-needed focus on the validity of biomedical research results that has come under scrutiny. However, as they make clear, due to the complexity of the experiments involved, errors quite naturally occur frequently. A way of managing these errors is the “Laboratory Critical Incident and Error Reporting System” (LabCIRS), a software tool to record all incidents anonymously and to analyze, discuss, and communicate them. It has been adapted from the CIRS, used in the clinical world to improve patient safety in complex, fast-paced, and often understaffed settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker, M. 2016a. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533: 452–454.
———. 2016b. How quality control could save your science. Nature 529: 456–458.
Begley, C.G., A.M. Buchan, and U. Dirnagl. 2015. Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility. Nature 525: 25–27.
Carey, B. 2015. Science, now under scrutiny itself. New York Times, p. D1. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/science/retractions-coming-out-from-under-science-rug.html?_r=1
Cooper, J.B., R.S. Newbower, C.D. Long, and B. McPeek. 1978. Preventable anesthesia mishaps: A study of human factors. Anesthesiology 49: 399–406.
Cyranoski, D. 2006. Verdict: Hwang’s human stem cells were all fakes. Nature 439: 122–123.
Davies, R. 2013. Good research practice: It is time to do what others think we do. Quasar (124): 21–23.
Dirnagl, U., I. Przesdzing, C. Kurreck, and S. Major. 2016. A laboratory critical incident and error reporting system for experimental biomedicine. PLoS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000705.
Flanagan, J.C. 1954. The critical incident technique. Psychology Bulletin 51: 327–358.
Ioannidis, J.P.A. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2: e124.
Ioannidis, J.P.A., D. Fanelli, D.D. Dunne, and S.N. Goodman. 2015. Meta-research: Evaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology 13: e1002264.
Macleod, M.R., et al. 2014. Biomedical research: Increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet 383: 101–104.
Obokata, H., et al. 2014. Retraction: Stimulus-triggered fate conversion of somatic cells into pluripotency. Nature 511: 112.
Riedl, D.H., and M.K. Dunn. 2013. Quality assurance mechanisms for the unregulated research environment. Trends Biotechnology 31: 552–554.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Sebastian Major, Ingo Przesdzing, and Claudia Kurreck for developing, implementing, and testing LabCIRS.
Funding Statement
Ulrich Dirnagl acknowledges the financial support of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF 01 EO 08 01) and the Herman and Lilly Schilling Foundations. The funders had no role in the decision to publish or the preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests
None of the authors have any competing interests to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dirnagl, U., Bernard, R. (2018). Errors and Error Management in Biomedical Research. In: Hagen, J. (eds) How Could This Happen?. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76403-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76403-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76402-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76403-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)