Skip to main content

Error Management in the German Armed Forces’ Military Aviation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Could This Happen?
  • 1000 Accesses

Abstract

Based on his extensive knowledge gained in leading positions of military aviation, the author demonstrates that reaching, and sometimes even exceeding, the limits of human capacity plays an increasingly crucial role in incidents involving modern and highly complex systems. As a result, the author states, we have to realize that people—even when they are qualified personnel—err and cannot prevail in all critical situations. In addition, one person alone will no longer be able to handle the mass of data contained in highly complex systems. Instead, individual experts must turn into communicative team players. This requires that soft as well as hard skills have to be continuously trained and evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Crew, Maintenance, and Team Resource Management are all referred to as CRM in the text.

References

  • Australian National Transport Commission. 2004. Fatigue management within the rail industry: Review of regulatory approach. Melbourne: Australian National Transport Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badke-Schaub, P., G. Hofinger, and C. Lauche. 2008. Human factors, Psychologie sicheren Handelns in Risikobranchen. N.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, G., D. Besnard, and Captain D. Riley. 2007. Cognitive mismatches in the cockpit: Will they ever be a thing of the past? N.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundeswehr. 2006. CRM Konzept – Deutsche Luftwaffe. N.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses pour la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile. 2012. Final report Flight AF 447, July. N.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J.M., and B. Latané. 1968. Bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8 (4): 377–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinges, D.F., F. Pack, K. Williams, K.A. Gillen, J.W. Powell, G.E. Ott, C. Aptowicz, and A.I. Pack. 1997. Cumulative sleepiness, mood disturbance, and psychomotor vigilance performance decrements during a week of sleep restricted to 4-5 hours per night. Sleep 20 (4): 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endsley. 1995. Torward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factor 37 (1): 32–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Aviation Safety Agency. 2015. Annual safety review 2014. N.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Cockpit Association. 2012. Pilot fatigue barometer. N.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. 1901. Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens. Reprint 1948. Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauss, C.F. 1823. Theoria combinationis observationum erroribus minimis obnoxiae. Commentations societ. reg. Scient. Götting. rec. Vol. V. hrsg. 1880 von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft. Leibzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, A., K.B. Avers, and J.J. Hiles. 2011. Fatigue risk management in aviation maintenance: Current best practices and potential future countermeasures. Technical report No. DOT/FAA/AM-11/10, Federal Aviation Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Air Transport Association. 2016, February 5. International Air Transport Association releases 2015 safety performance. N.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G., and M.R. Ensley. 1996. Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 67 (6): 507–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, M. 2012. Technical officer (human performance), ICAO. Measuring fatigue Asia-Pacific FRMS Seminar. Bangkok.

    Google Scholar 

  • Necker, I.A. 1832. Ueber einige merkwürdige optische Phänomene. Annalen der Physik 103 (3): 497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. 1982. Human errors: A taxonomy for describing human malfunction in industrial installations. Journal of Occupational Accidents 4 (2–4): 311–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. 2000. Human error: Models and management. BMJ: British Medical Journal 320 (7237): 768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumerauer, A. 2016. Was bedeutet Verantwortlichkeit. Sachverständige Heft 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller M.J., and K.H. Roberts. 2003. High reliability and organizational behavior: finally the twain must meet. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24 (7): 813–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., and J.T. Reason. 1994. Human errors and error handling. An introduction. Applied Psychology: An International Review 43: 427–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., M. Frese., and F.C. Brodbeck. 1999. Fehler und Fehlermanagement. N.p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Klement, P. (2018). Error Management in the German Armed Forces’ Military Aviation. In: Hagen, J. (eds) How Could This Happen?. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76403-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics