Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Essentials of Mini ‒ One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass pp 81–86Cite as

Late Complications of MGB: Prevention and Treatment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to illustrate late complications following MGB, to report their rate and to suggest their treatment. The experience of many authors has been therefore evaluated. Gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) and malnutrition problems are the most frequent complication following this surgical technique. Frequently, medical treatment reduces the need for reoperation due to these causes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Musella M, Susa A, Manno E, De Luca M, Greco F, Raffaelli M, Cristiano S, Milone M, Bianco P, Vilardi A, Damiano I, Segato G, Pedretti L, Giustacchini P, Fico D, Veroux G, Piazza L. Complications following the mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB): a multi-institutional survey on 2678 patients with a mid-term (5 years) follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27:2956–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2726-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sifrim D. Management of bile reflux. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY). 2013;9:179–80.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vaezi MF, Richter JE. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux and methods to monitor nonacidic reflux. Am J Med. 2001;111(Suppl 8A):160S–8S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, et al. Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal re-flux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tolone S, Cristiano S, Savarino E, et al. Effects of omega-loop bypass on esophagogastric junction function. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:62–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mion F, Tolone S, Garros A, Savarino E, Pelascini E, Robert M, Poncet G, et al. High-resolution impedance manometry after sleeve gastrectomy: Increased intragastric pressure and reflux are frequent events. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2449–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015;25:951–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee WJ, Lee YC, Ser KH, et al. Revisional surgery for laparoscopic minigastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:486–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luque-de-Leon E, Carbajo MA. Conversion of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is rarely needed if standard operative techniques are performed. Obes Surg. 2016;26:1588–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, Ortiz-de-Solórzano J, Pérez-Miranda M, Castro-Alija MJ. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1153–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuchs KH, Maroske J, Fein M, et al. Variability in the composition of physiologic duodenogastric reflux. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3:389–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Atak I, Ozdil K, Yücel M, et al. The effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the development of alkaline reflux gastritis and intestinal metaplasia. Hepato-Gastroenterol. 2012;59:59–61.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schindlbeck NE, Heinrich C, Stellaard F, et al. Healthy controls have as much bile reflux as gastric ulcer patients. Gut. 1987;28:1577–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jammu GS, Sharma R. A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and mini-gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg. 2016;26:926–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nimeri A, Al Shaban T, Maasher A. Laparoscopic conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for bile reflux gastritis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:119–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Georgiadou D, Sergentanis TN, Nixon A, et al. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. A systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:984–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1827–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. A 6-year experience with 1,054 mini-gastric bypasses – first study from Indian subcontinent. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1430–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee WJ, Wang W, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: experience with tailored bypass limb according to body weight. Obes Surg. 2008;18:294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22:697–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. García-Caballero M, Reyes-Ortiz A, Garcia M, et al. Changes of body composition in patients with BMI 23-50 after tailored one anastomosis gastric bypass (BAGUA): influence of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Obes Surg. 2014;24:2040–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Higa K, Ho T, Tercero F, et al. Laparoscopic Roux- en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:516–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bernert CP, Ciangura C, Coupaye M, et al. Nutritional deficiency after gastric bypass: diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Diabetes Metab. 2007;33:13–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hammer HF. Medical complications of bariatric surgery: focus on malabsortion and dumping syndrome. Dig Dis. 2012;30:182–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rubin DC, Levin MS. Mechanisms of intestinal adaptation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30:237–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rutledge R, Walsh W. Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1304–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Musella M, Sousa A, Greco F, et al. The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: the Italian experience: outcomes from 974 consecutive cases in a multi-center review. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:156–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sverdén E, Mattsson F, Sondén A, et al. Risk factors for marginal ulcer after gastric bypass surgery for obesity: a population-based cohort study. Ann Surg. 2016;263:733–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson WH, Fernandez AZ, Farrell TM, et al. Surgical revision of loop (mini) gastric bypass procedure: multicenter review of complications and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:37–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Woodward GA, Morton JM. Stomal stenosis after gastric bypass. In: Deitel M, Gagner M, Dixon JB, Himpens J, editors. Handbook of obesity surgery. Toronto: FD-Communications; 2010. p. 102–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, “Federico II” University, Naples, Italy

    Mario Musella MD & Alessio Bocchetti MD

Authors
  1. Mario Musella MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alessio Bocchetti MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Musella MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Obesity Surgery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Mervyn Deitel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Musella, M., Bocchetti, A. (2018). Late Complications of MGB: Prevention and Treatment. In: Deitel, M. (eds) Essentials of Mini ‒ One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76177-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76177-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76176-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76177-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation