Skip to main content

Diverted MGB: A New Procedure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Essentials of Mini ‒ One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

Abstract

The mini-gastric bypass or one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) is now growing rapidly in popularity as a safe and effective procedure, with excellent control of weight and co-morbidities in long-term evaluations. Worldwide, it seems to have an important place in the bariatric armamentarium, being better or, at least, as good as the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

However, there are some significant clinical issues. “Biliary reflux”, “marginal ulcer” or excessive weight loss need better understanding, leading to improved treatment.

We found that by adding a Roux-en-Y diversion to the MGB-OAGB cases which had pathologic post-operative reflux, we were giving patients a very comfortable and effective solution. Thus, in 2013, we decided to do the same in some primary patients who we knew were at risk for gastro-esophageal reflux. We got the same good outcomes.

Diverted mini-gastric bypass (dMGB) is now an established technique in our practice, in about one-third of the patients who receive a gastric bypass. Here we describe the rationale of the concept, the surgical technique and the clinical outcomes of the first 300 patients of our series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mason EE, Ito C. Gastric bypass in obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 1967;47:1345–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed. Accessed 02 May 2013.

  3. O’Brien PE, McPhail T, Chaston TB, et al. Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1032–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Christou NV, Look D, MacLean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244:734–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Barhouch AS, Zardo M, Padoin AV, et al. Excess weight loss variation in late postoperative period of gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1479–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reinhold RB. Critical analysis of long-term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;155:385–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Higa K, Ho T, Tercero F, Yunus T, Boone KB. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:516–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Prachand V, Da Vee R, Alverdy J. Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super obese [BMI >50] compared to gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;244:611–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:20–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, Daher R, Antoun NA, Nasr M. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22:697–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, Guenzi M, Berger A, Chevallier JM. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:321–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. BOMSS Position Statement on Mini Gastric Bypass September 2014, review date September 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, Ortiz-de-Solórzano J, Pérez-Miranda M, Castro-Alija MJ. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1153–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Deitel M, Hargroder D, Peraglie C. Mini-gastric bypass for bariatric surgery increasing worldwide. Austin J Surg. 2016;3(3):1092–6. https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjsurg.2016.1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Musella M, Susa A, Greco F, De Luca M, Manno E, Di Stefano C, Milone M, Bonfanti R, Segato G, Antonino A, Piazza L. Complications following the Mini/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB/OAGB): a multi-institutional survey on 2678 patients with a mid-term (5 years) follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2956–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2726-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramos A, Silva A, Ramos M, Canseco E, Galvão-Neto M, Menezes M, Galvão T, Bastos E. Simplified gastric bypass: 13 years of experience and 12,000 patients operated. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27(Suppl 1):2–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang L, Tan WH, Chang R, Eagon JC. Perioperative risk and complications of revisional bariatric surgery compared to primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1316–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stroh C, Weiner R, Wolff S, Knoll C, Manger T. Revisional surgery and reoperations in obesity and metabolic surgery: Data analysis of the German bariatric surgery registry 2005-2012. Chirurg. 2015;86:346–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stefanidis D, Malireddy K, Kuwada T, Phillips R, Zoog E, Gersin KS. Revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative morbidity is determined by type of procedure. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4504–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ribeiro R. Revisional surgery: an inevitable practice. Obesity: Open Access: Editorial Volume: 2.2 (ISSN 2380–5528).1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paredes B, Guerra A, Manaça L, Pereira J, Ribeiro R, Viveiros O. What’s the best REDO? BMI 4.5.10 (600–609).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ribeiro, R., Guerra, A., Viveiros, O. (2018). Diverted MGB: A New Procedure. In: Deitel, M. (eds) Essentials of Mini ‒ One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76177-0_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76177-0_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76176-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76177-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics