Skip to main content

Suppressing the Mosquitoes’ Coughs: An Introduction to Holy Envy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning from Other Religious Traditions

Part of the book series: Pathways for Ecumenical and Interreligious Dialogue ((PEID))

  • 275 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter opens the volume by introducing Krister Stendahl’s call to “always leave room for holy envy” in the face of interreligious encounters. In so doing, Gustafson provides examples of holy envy from his own experience. These include the Jewish mourning tradition of Shiva, a reflection on Daoism’s principle of wu wei (non-doing), and a reflection from Rabbi Anson Laytner on Chinese Judaism in China. This chapter also introduces the chapters in this volume, their authors, and their foci.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (“Lou Gehrig’s disease”).

  2. 2.

    We removed this line so as not to misrepresent ourselves as Jewish . Instead, we simply told friends and family that we all moved into my brother’s house for the week and that they were welcome to come spend time with us, which of course they all did.

  3. 3.

    George W.E. Nickelsburg describes Stendahl as a “professor, dean, historian of religion, theologian, churchman, [and] pastor” (Nickelsburg, “Preface,” v). Stendahl is beloved and well-known beyond the Christian traditions as well. Susannah Heschel, speaking on Jewish-Christian relations, has remarked on more than one occasion that “after the war God sent us Krister Stendahl” [Susannah Heschel, “Problems of Identity : Judaism and Christianity in the Modern European Context,” lecture (Skálholt, Iceland: 2011), and “From Rabbi to Nazi: The Vicissitudes of Jesus in Modern Theology ,” The Krister Stendahl Memorial Lecture (Stockholm, Sweden: 2011); also quoted in Jesper Svartvik, “In Memory of Krister Stendahl on his Idea of ‘Holy Envy,’” lecture (Jerusalem: Hartman Institute, 2009).

  4. 4.

    The claim here is not that Stendahl first proposed the concept of envying rich religious traditions of others, but rather he made popular the phrase holy envy. I suspect, by no means, he was hardly the first to articulate such an idea. Parallel ideas most certainly are to be found in other thinkers. For instance, Lee Yearley famously spoke of “spiritual regret” [Lee H. Yearley, New Religious Virtues and the Study of Religion, lecture (Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, 1994)], as “the recognition of a ‘religious good’ in the other person’s tradition that we cannot share” but nonetheless admire. [Edward K. Kaplan, “Spiritual Regret and Holy Envy,” Spiritus 5, no. 1 (Spring 2005), pp. 105–06]. Mary C. Boys acknowledges that “the concepts of spiritual regret and holy envy express an important dimension of interreligious learning: when we drink deeply from the wells of another tradition, we may see more clearly distortions and deficiencies in our own” [Mary C. Boys, Jewish-Christian Dialogue: One Woman’s Experience (New York, NY: Paulist Press, 1997), 58].

  5. 5.

    See Trice, “The Future of Religious Identity: A Spirit of Generosity,” 28n and Landau, “An Interview with Krister Stendahl.”

  6. 6.

    Krister Stendahl, “From God’s Perspective We are All Minorities,” Journal of Religious Pluralism 2, 1993.

  7. 7.

    Trice, “The Future of Religious Identity: A Spirit of Generosity,” 28.

  8. 8.

    Jesper Svartvik, “In Memory of Krister Stendahl on his Idea of ‘Holy Envy,’” lecture (Jerusalem: Hartman Institute, 2009).

  9. 9.

    Stendahl writes, “Apologetics, defending the Bible —defending God, for that matter—is a rather arrogant activity. Who is defending whom? I love to use the old Swedish expression, ‘It is pathetic to hear mosquitoes cough’ [‘Det är löjligt att höra myggor hosta’]. I don’t know why that is funny, but in Swedish it is funny. And apologetics is mosquitoes coughing. It kills so much of the joy in reading and practicing the love of the scriptures” (Stendahl, “Why I love the Bible”).

  10. 10.

    Nickelsburg, “Preface,” v.

  11. 11.

    Heathen (big “H”) specifically refers to Germanic polytheism and should not be understood to mean heathen (small “h”) in the generic sense of non-Abrahamic.

  12. 12.

    Ásatrú is from the Icelandic ásatrú from Old Icelandic ása (God) and trú (belief), and refers to the contemporary reconstruction and practice of pre-Christian Germanic-Scandinavian religion.

  13. 13.

    Laytner, “Jews, God and Theodicy ,” 37–54.

  14. 14.

    Ibid., 51.

  15. 15.

    Tian (天) is an ancient Chinese term referring to either “Heaven ” (figuratively or symbolically) or the actual (literal) sky. It can also refer to an impersonal divine force that controls the world or a cosmic moral principle that determines right from wrong.

  16. 16.

    Laytner, “Jews, God and Theodicy,” 47.

  17. 17.

    Ibid.

  18. 18.

    Ibid., 48.

  19. 19.

    Ibid., 51.

  20. 20.

    Other popular translations of the opening line of poem eight read, “The best (person) is like water ” (Wing-Tsit Chan, trans., A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy), “The highest form of goodness is like water” (John C.H. Wu, trans., Tao Teh Ching), “Highest good is like water” (D.C. Lau, trans., Lao Tzu: Tao Te Ching), and “The Highest good is like water” (Robert Hendricks, trans., Te-Tao Ching).

  21. 21.

    Other popular translations of this line reads, “It dwells in (lowly) places that all disdain” (Wing-Tsit Chan, trans., A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy), “It stays in places loathed by all men” (John C.H. Wu, trans., Tao Teh Ching), “(water) settles where none would like to be” (D.C. Lau, trans., Lao Tzu: Tao Te Ching), and “It dwells in places the masses of people detest” (Robert Hendricks, trans., Te-Tao Ching).

Bibliography

  • Boys, Mary C. 1997. Jewish-Christian Dialogue: One Woman’s Experience. New York: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dao De Ching (translations)

    Google Scholar 

  • A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Translated by Wing-Tsit Chan. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lao Tzu: Tao Te Ching. 1963. Trans. D.C. Lau. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao Teh Ching. 1989. Trans. John C.H. Wu. Boston: Shambala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Te-Tao Ching. 1993. Trans. Robert Hendricks. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heschel, Susannah. 2011a. From Rabbi to Nazi: The Vicissitudes of Jesus in Modern Theology. The Krister Stendahl Memorial Lecture. Stockholm: Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Problems of Identity: Judaism and Christianity in the Modern European Context. Lecture. Skálholt: Iceland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Edward K. “Spiritual Regret and Holy Envy.” Spiritus 5, no. 1. Spring 2005. 103–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, Yehezkel. 2007. An Interview with Krister Stendahl. Harvard Divinity Bulletin 35(1), Winter. https://bulletin.hds.harvard.edu/articles/winter2007/interview-krister-stendahl. Accessed 21 Sept 2017.

  • Laytner, Anson. 2015. Jews, God and Theodicy. In Religious Identity and Renewal in the Twenty-First Century: Jewish, Christian and Muslim Explorations, ed. Simone Sinn and Michael Reid Trice, 37–54. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickelsburg, George W.E. 1986. Preface. In Christians Among Jews and Gentiles: Essays in Honor of Krister Stendahl on His Sixty-Fifth Birthday, ed. George W.E. Nickelsburg and George W. MacRae. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stendahl, Krister. 1993. From God’s Perspective We Are All Minorities. Journal of Religious Pluralism 2: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Why I Love the Bible. Harvard Divinity Bulletin 35(1), Winter. https://bulletin.hds.harvard.edu/articles/winter2007/why-i-love-bible. Accessed 21 Sept 2017.

  • Svartvik, Jesper. 2009. In Memory of Krister Stendahl on His Idea of “Holy Envy”. Lecture. Jerusalem: Hartman Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trice, Michael Reid. 2015. The Future of Religious Identity: A Spirit of Generosity. In Religious Identity and Renewal in the Twenty-First Century: Jewish, Christian and Muslim Explorations, ed. Simone Sinn and Michael Reid Trice, 19–36. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gustafson, H. (2018). Suppressing the Mosquitoes’ Coughs: An Introduction to Holy Envy. In: Gustafson, H. (eds) Learning from Other Religious Traditions. Pathways for Ecumenical and Interreligious Dialogue. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76108-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics