Abstract
This paper aims to highlight the crucial challenges faced by the regions of the European Union (EU) when applying the EU’s ‘Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation’ (RIS3) policy to implement its ‘Cohesion Policy’ and ‘Europe 2020’ agendas. The author maintains that policymakers, planners, entrepreneurs, local communities and the other stakeholders involved in the future of urban regions should adopt a fresh view of the current innovation strategies at the forefront of the European debate, informed in particular by lessons from US experiences. With reference to the current literature on the subject, the author argues that it is possible to draw insights from international best practice—such as the clusters present in the Boston area and the ‘innovation districts’ that have been growing across the US over the past few years—and assumes that some similarities exist between ‘innovation clusters’ and ‘smart specialisation’. Following the in-depth discussion of the main disciplinary schools of thought about the key features of the RIS3 and the ways in which it resembles and diverges from cluster policy, the paper proposes a critical interpretation of what may be deemed an ‘innovation strategy’ at the urban level. Lessons drawn from the Boston innovation strategy may be considered significant with respect to the RIS3 path to be implemented in European Union regions and urban areas. The paper concludes that, in order to pursue a genuinely place-based and entrepreneurial innovation process, it is necessary to support grassroots projects—both business and social—rather than to prioritize only top-down, economic and ‘real-estate’ driven planning initiatives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aranguren, M. J., & Wilson, J. R. (2013). What can experience with clusters teach us about fostering regional smart specialisation. Ekonomiaz, 83(2), 126–145.
Bagnasco, A. (1977). Tre Italie. La problematica territoriale dello sviluppo italiano. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Becattini, G. (1990). The Marshallian ID as a Socio-economic Notion. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), IDs and inter-firm co-operation in Italy (pp. 37–51). Geneva: International Institute for Labor Studies.
Becattini, G. (2015). La coscienza dei luoghi. Il territorio come soggetto corale. Roma: Donzelli Editore.
Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. A ‘place-based’ approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Accessed as April 28, 2017 www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/regi/dv/barca_report_/barca_report_en.pdf.
Capello, R., & Kroll, H. (2016). From theory to practice in smart specialisation strategy: Emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1393–1406.
Capello, R. (2014). Smart specialisation strategy and the new EU Cohesion Policy reform: Introductory remarks. Scienze Regionali, 13(1), 5–14.
Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: Toward smart innovation policies. Growth and Change, 44(2), 355–389.
Capello, R., Cappellin, R., Ferlaino, F., & Rizzi, P. (2012). Territorial patterns of innovation. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Chatterji, A., Glaeser, E., & Kerr, W. (2014). Cluster of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Innovation Policy and Economy, 14(1), 129–166.
Coffano, M., & Foray, D. (2014). The centrality of entrepreneurial discovery in building and implementing a smart specialisation strategy. Scienze Regionali, 13(1), 33–50.
Falk, M. (2006). What drives business R&D intensity across OECD countries? Applied Economics, 38(5), 533–547.
Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. H. (2011). Smart specialisation. From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation. Ecole Polytechnique Féderale Lausanne: working paper 170252. Accessed at April 28, 2017 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/29ad/6773ef30f362d7d3937c483003d974bc91c5.pdf.
European Commission. (2009). Knowledge for growth. Prospects for science technology and innovation. Selected papers from Research Commissioner Janez Potočnik’s Expert Group, Accessed at: http://www.ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/monitoring/knowledge_en.htm.
European Commission. (2010). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Regional Policy contributing to smart growth in Europe 2020. Brussels: COM (2010) 553 final.
European Commission. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3). Brussels: CEC.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
Glaeser, E., & Kerr, W. (2009). Local industrial conditions and entrepreneurship: How much of the spatial distribution can we explain? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18(3), 623–663.
Glaeser, E., Kerr, W., & Ponzetto, G. (2010). Clusters of Entrepreneurship. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(1), 150–168.
Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003). Economic development as self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72(2), 603–633.
Iacobucci, D. (2014). Designing and implementing a smart specialisation strategy at a regional level: Some open question. Scienze Regionali, 13(1), 107–126.
Kahn, C. B., Martin, J. K., & Mehta, A. (2012). City of ideas: Reinventing Boston’s innovation economy: The Boston indicators report 2012. Boston, MA: The Boston Foundation.
Katz, B., & Wagner, J. (2014). The rise of innovation district: A new geography of innovation in America. Washington: Brookings Institution.
Lerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of Broken dreams. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lorenzen, M. (2007). Social capital and localised learning: Proximity and place in technological and institutional dynamics. Urban Studies, 44(4), 799–817.
Madelin, R., & Ringrose, D. (Eds.) (2016). Opportunity now: Europe’s mission to innovate. European Commission, Directorate General for Communication Networks, Content and Technology, Brussels.
Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 5–35.
McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialisation regional growth and applications to European Union Cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302.
NIDC. (2015). Neighborhood Innovation District Committee Report & Recommendations. Boston, MA.
O’Mahony, M., & Vecchi, M. (2005). Quantifying the impact of ICT capital on output growth: A heterogeneous dynamic panel approach. Economica, 72(288), 615–633.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of notions. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73–93.
Porter, M. E. (1996). Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. International Regional Science Review, 19(1–2), 85–90.
Porter, M. E. (2007). Clusters and economic policy: Aligning public policy with the new economics of competition. Harvard Business School Paper.
Rauch, J. (1993). Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: Evidence from the cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 34(3), 380–400.
Samila, S., & Sorenson, O. (2011). Venture Capital, Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 338–349.
Sugden, R., Wei, P., & Wilson, J. R. (2006). Clusters, governance and the development of local economies: A framework for case studies. In C. Pitelis, R. Sugden, & J. R. Wilson (Eds.), Clusters and globalisation: The development of Urban and Regional Economies (pp. 63–83). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Acknowledgements
This paper is related to the dissemination of the EU ‘MAPS-LED’ (Multidisciplinary Approach to Plan Specialisation Strategies for Local Economic Development) research project, Horizon 2020, Marie Skłodowska-Curie action RISE (Research and Innovation Staff Exchange), 2015–2019. The text represents the author’s personal evolution of his ideas from previous papers, within research activities carried out by the author together with Trillo C., Bianchi L., Del Re N., Simone A. and Tani A.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Monardo, B. (2018). What Interpretations for ‘Smart Specialization Strategies’ in European Urban Regions? Lessons from Boston. In: Bisello, A., Vettorato, D., Laconte, P., Costa, S. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. SSPCR 2017. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75773-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75774-2
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)