Skip to main content

High-Fidelity Simulation in Neuroanaesthesia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Neurosurgery

Part of the book series: Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation ((CHS))

  • 754 Accesses

Abstract

Simulation is a hugely versatile education tool, offering opportunities to practice domain-related knowledge and procedural skills themselves in an environment that is psychologically safe for the learner and without risking patient safety. Simulation comes into its own when established multidisciplinary clinical teams can practice critical incident management together, as it provides a concrete learning experience upon which to act, reflect and share mental models of specific clinical problems and hone non-technical and human factors skills. Anaesthesia as a specialty has been a driving force behind immersive simulation training, and the time for regular cross specialty simulation training has come. This is particularly relevant to the practice of neurosurgery where an acute incident has profound effects on the operative site, and the physiology of our patients requires rapid yet complex management. This chapter outlines some of the considerations for undertaking high-fidelity immersive simulation for neuroanaesthesia and outlines some of the evidence for its utility as well as key components for successful learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011;86:706–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruppacher HR, et al. Simulation-based training improves physicians’ performance in patient care in high-stakes clinical setting of cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:985–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fletcher G, et al. Anaesthetists’ non-technical skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90:580–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kolb A, Kolb D. The SAGE handbook of management learning, education and development. London: Sage Publications; 2009. p. 42–68.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Levels of harm in primary care. NHS Inst Innov Improv. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cook DA, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teac. 2013;35:e867–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. BEME: features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27:10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gardner AK, Scott DJ. Concepts for developing expert surgical teams using simulation. Surg Clin North Am. 2015;95:717–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook DA. Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Acad Med. 2014;89:387–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dieckmann P, Gaba D, Rall M. Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simul Healthc. 2007;2:183–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There’s no such thing as ‘nonjudgmental’ debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc. 2006;1:49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schön DA. The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stanley, B. (2018). High-Fidelity Simulation in Neuroanaesthesia. In: Alaraj, A. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Neurosurgery. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75583-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75583-0_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75582-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75583-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics