Abstract
This chapter provides an extended commentary on how contemporary Russian fields of finance have become intertwined both with the state and with a new bifurcated ruling class of state and business elites. The elites of state and business fields use financial institutions and organizations for rent-seeking gain, rather than as a vehicle for profit from serving economic growth and the general population. This chapter also suggests that the political and media fields have been co-opted by state and business elites and drawn into the orbit of their fields: both media and democracy have created a quiescent, tamed population that, if not supporting the elite and their wealth, at least does not have means or expectations to resist the new political economy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Financial Flows and Tax Havens: Combining to Limit the Lives of Billions of People (Centre for Applied Research, Norwegian School of Economics, 2015): 8 (http://www.gfintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Financial_Flows-final.pdf), accessed October 24, 2017.
- 3.
https://www.moex.com/ru/ir/interactive-analysis.aspx (accessed March 18, 2018).
- 4.
“The Economist”: dollar dolzhen stoit 23 rublia.” Vesti.ru, January 11, 2016 (http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2706834), retrieved October 24, 2017.
- 5.
Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation: http://info.minfin.ru/fbdohod.php.
- 6.
OECD data on inequality, https://data.oecd.org/inequality/income-inequality.htm (accessed October 24, 2017).
- 7.
Glavnaia kniga, http://glavkniga.ru/situations/k502289 (accessed October 24, 2017).
- 8.
- 9.
Economy Times, http://economytimes.ru/sites/default/files/25-06-2016-doklad-ranhigs.pdf (accessed October 24, 2017).
- 10.
As of 2015, 64% of Google shares belong to this group: JPMorgan Chase & Co. 6.56%, Goldman Sachs Group 5.72%, Bank of America Corporation 6.2%, Berkshire Hathaway 8.68%, and Wells Fargo 5.99%. http://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/011516/top-5-google-shareholders-goog.asp#ixzz4eUtO1wpT (accessed October 24, 2017).
- 11.
- 12.
Works Cited
Bernays, Edward. 1928. Propaganda. New York: Horace Liveright.
Bogle, John C. 2012. The Clash of the Cultures: Investment vs. Speculation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loic J.D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.
Menger, K. 1992. Osnovaniia politicheskoi eonomii. In Avstriiskaia shkola v politicheskoi ekonomii: K. Menger, E. Bem-Baverk, F. Vizer, ed. V.S. Avtonomov, 31–242. Moscow: Ekonomika.
Wolff, Kurt H. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bartenev, A. (2018). Fields of Russian Finance: State Versus Market. In: Hass, J. (eds) Re-Examining the History of the Russian Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75414-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75414-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75413-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75414-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)