Abstract
Psychoanalysis has a long tradition where different concepts have been developed. The beginnings of psychoanalysis focused on psychic mechanisms of various disorders ranging from melancholia to the various forms of neuroses.
Importantly, Freud himself aimed to develop a psychology on a mechanistic basis. Initially, being a neuroanatomist, he considered the brain and, in his 1895 writing of a scientific psychology, wanted to link it to the psychic level. That, following Freud, failed, for which reason he gave up such neuropsychodynamic approach.
The present chapter sketches Freud’s and subsequent developments in psychoanalysis. It finishes with the most recent development of neuropsychoanalysis where it highlights the different approaches including the cognitive-affective approach (Solms, Panksepp) and relational-spatiotemporal as highlighted in this book.
* The first part of this chapter is based on the research lecture at the celebration of the centenary of the International Psychoanalytical Association in Berlin, 2010.
** This chapter is based on former publications (Leuzinger-Bohleber 2009, 2015).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The literature in the following section is selected illustrating some important historical and contemporary studies. For a more complete overview see Leuzinger-Bohleber and Kaechele (2015).
References
Ahumada JL, Doria-Medina R. Über Forschung. Ein kontrapunktischer Dialog. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Canestri J, Target M, editors. Früh e Entwicklungen und ihre Störungen. Frankfurt: Brandes & Apsel; 2009. p. 204–18.
Alexander F. The neurotic personality of our time, by Karen Horney. New York, 1937. Psychoanal Q. 1937;6:536–40.
Altmann de Litvan M, editor. Time for change. London: Karnac; 2014.
Argelander H. Das Erstinterview in der Psychotherapie. 3rd ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft; 1967. p. 1987.
Bachrach HM, Weber JJ, Solomon M. Factors associated with the outcome of psychoanalysis (clinical and methodological considerations): report of the Columbia Psychoanalytic Center Research Project. Int Rev Psychoanal. 1985;12:379–89.
Bachrach HM, Galatzer-Levy R, Skolnikoff A. On the efficacy of psychoanalysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1991;39:871–916.
Beenen F. Die Amsterdamer PEP-Studie. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Stuhr U, editors. Psychoanalysen im Rückblick. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag; 1997. p. 336–47.
Bernardi R. What kind of evidence makes the analyst change his or her theoretical and technical ideas? In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Dreher AU, Canestri J, editors. Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis. London: International Psychoanalytical Association; 2003. p. 125–37.
Boesky D. Psychoanalytic controversies contextualized. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2005;53:835–63.
Bohleber W. Die Entwicklung der Psychoanalyse in Deutschland nach 1945. Vortrag auf der Tagung der DPG und DPV: 100 Jahre Internationale Psychoanalytische Vereinigung (IPV) – 100 Jahre institutionalisierte Psychoanalyse in Deutschland, Berlin, 7 Mar 2010; 2010.
Bohleber W, Jimenez JP, Scarfone D, Varvin S, Zysman S. Unconscious fantasy: an attempt at conceptual integration. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Arnold S, Solms M, editors. The unconscious. A bridge between psychoanalysis and cognitive neuroscience. New York: Routledge; 2017. p. 39–65.
von Braun C. Haben Institutionen ein Unbewusstes? Vortrag auf der Tagung der DPG und DPV: 100 Jahre Internationale Psychoanalytische Vereinigung (IPV) – 100 Jahre institutionalisierte Psychoanalyse in Deutschland, Berlin, 5 Mar 2010; 2010.
Chiesa M. Can psychoanalytic research integrate and improve knowledge for clinical practice? Some reflections and an example. Scand Psychoanal Rev. 2005;28:31–9.
Colombo D, Michels R. Can (should) case reports be written for research use? Psychoanal Inq. 2007;27:640–9.
Coriat I. Some statistical results of the psychoanalytic treatment of the psychoneuroses. Psychoanal Rev. 1917;4:209–16.
Dahl H, Kächele H, Thomä H, editors. Psychoanalytic process research strategies. Berlin: Springer; 1988.
Driessen E, Cuijpers P, de Maat SC, Abbass AA, de Jonghe F, Dekker JJ. The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30:25–36.
Duarte Guimaraes Filho P. Klinisch-konzeptuelle Forschung im Bereich des Aufbaus heutigen psychoanalytischen Wissens. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Canestri J, Target M, editors. Frühe Entwicklungen und ihre Störungen. Frankfurt: Brandes & Apsel; 2009. p. 237–52.
Ellman S. When theories touch. A historical and theoretical integration of psychoanalytic thought. London: Karnac; 2010.
Erle JB. An approach to the study of analyzability and analyses: the course of forty consecutive cases selected for supervised analysis. Psychoanal Q. 1979;48:198–228.
Falzeder E. Die Gründungsgeschichte der IPV und der Berliner Ortsgruppe. Vortrag auf der Tagung der DPG und DPV: 100 Jahre Internationale Psychoanalytische Vereinigung (IPV) – 100 Jahre institutionalisierte Psychoanalyse in Deutschland, Berlin, 6 Mar 2010; 2010.
Feldman F. Results of psychoanalysis in clinic case assignments. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1968;16:274–300.
Fenichel O. Statistischer Bericht über die therapeutische Tätigkeit 1920-1930. In: Zehn Jahre Berliner Psychoanalytisches Institut. Wien: Verlag Internationale Psychoanalyse; 1930. p. 13–9.
Fonagy P. Epistemological and methodological issues on process and outcome research. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Kaechele H, editors. Open door review. 3rd ed. London: International Psychoanalytical Association; 2015.
Freud S. Die Frage der Laienanalyse, vol. 14. Leipzig: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag; 1926. p. 207–86.
Grande T, Rudolf G, Oberbracht C. Die Praxisstudie Analytische Langzeittherapie. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Stuhr U, editors. Psychoanalysen im Rückblick. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag; 1997. p. 415–31.
Green A. The pluralism of sciences and psychoanalytic thinking. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Dreher AU, Canestri J, editors. Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis. London: International Psychoanalytical Association; 2003. p. 26–45.
Guggenheim Z, Hampe M, Schneider P, Strassberg D. Im Medium des Unbewußten: Zur Theorie der Psychoanalyse. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2017.
Habermas J. Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp; 1968.
Hamburg DA, Bibring GL, Fisher C, Stanton AH, Wallerstein RS, Weinstock HI, Haggard E. Report of ad hoc committee on central fact-gathering data of the American Psychoanalytic Association. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1967;15:841–61.
Hampe M. Pluralism of sciences and the unity of reason. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Dreher AU, Canestri J, editors. Pluralism or unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis. London: International Psychoanalytical Association; 2003. p. 45–63.
Hampe M. Pluralität der Wissenschaften und Einheit der Vernunft – Einige philosophische Anmerkungen zur Psychoanalyse. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Deserno H, Hau S, editors. Psychoanalyse als Profession und Wissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2004. p. 17–32.
Hau S. Unsichtbares sichtbar machen. Forschungsprobleme in der Psychoanalyse. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck u. Ruprecht; 2008.
Huber D, Klug G, von Rad M. Münchener Psychotherapie-Studie (MPS). In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Stuhr U, editors. Psychoanalysen im Rückblick. Methoden, Ergebnisse und Perspektiven der neueren Katamneseforschung. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag; 1997.
Hustveth S. Die zitternde Frau. Eine Geschichte meiner Nerven. Berlin: Rowohlt; 2010.
Illouz E. Gefühle in Zeiten des Kapitalismus. Adorno-Vorlesungen 2004. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp; 2006.
Jones E. The future of psycho-analysis. Int J Psychoanal. 1936;17:269–77.
Kantrowitz JL. The role of the patient-analyst “match” in the outcome of psychoanalysis. Annu Psychoanal. 1986;14:273–97.
Knight RP. Evaluation of the results of psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Am J Psychiatr. 1941;98:434–46.
Knoblauch SH. What are we trying to do when we write about the psychoanalytic interaction? The relevance of theory and research to clinical responsiveness: reply to commentaries. Psychoanal Dialogues. 2005;15:883–96.
Krause R. Allgemeine Psychoanalytische Krankheitslehre, vol. 1. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1997.
Lear J. The shrink is in. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Stuhr U, editors. Psychoanalysen im Rückblick. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag; 1995. p. 92–106.
Leichsenring F, Rabung S. Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;300:1551–65.
Leichsenring F, Rabung S. Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in complex mental disorders: update of a meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199:15–22.
Leuzinger-Bohleber M. Veränderung kognitiver Prozesse in Psychoanalysen. Bd. 1: Eine hypothesengenerierende Einzelfallstudie. Berlin: Springer; 1987.
Leuzinger-Bohleber M. Veränderung kognitiver Prozesse in Psychoanalysen. Bd. 2: Fünf aggregierte Einzelfallstudien. Berlin: Springer; 1989.
Leuzinger-Bohleber M. Finding the body in the mind – embodied memories, trauma, and depression. London: International Psychoanalytical Association/Karnac; 2015.
Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Kaechele H. Open door review. 3rd ed. London: International Psychoanalytical Association; 2015.
Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Pfeifer R. Remembering a depressive primary object? Memory in dialogue between psychoanalysis an cognitive science. Int J Psychoanal. 2002;83:3–33.
Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Dreher AU, Canestri J, editors. Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis. London: International Psychoanalytical Association; 2003a.
Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Hautzinger M, Fiedler G, Keller W, Bahrke U, Kallenbach L, Kaufhold J, Ernst M, Negele A, Schoett M, Küchenhoff H, Günther F, Rüger B, Beutel M. Outcome of psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral long-term-therapy with chronically depressed patients. A controlled trial with preferential and randomized allocation. Can J Psychiatry. 2018a; in press.
Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Kaufhold J, Kallenbach L, Negele A, Ernst M, Keller W, Fiedler G, Hautzinger M, Beutel M. Does sustained symptomatic improvement of chronically depressed patients need structural change in long-term psychotherapies? Findings from the LAC depression study comparing the outcomes of cognitive-behavioral and psychoanalytic long-term treatments. Int J Psychoanal. 2018b; in press.
Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Rüger B, Stuhr U, Beutel M. How to study the 'quality of psychoanalytic treatments’ and their long-term effects on patients’ well-being: a representative, multi-perspective follow-up study. Int J Psychoanal. 2003b;84:263–90.
Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Tahiri M, Hettich N. STEP-BY-STEP: Ein Pilotprojekt zur Unterstützung von Geflüchteten in der Hessischen Erstaufnahmeeinrichtung Michaelisdorf in Darmstadt. Psychotherapeut. 2017;62(1):341–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00278-017-0208-6.
Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Henningsen P, Pfeifer R. Die psychoanalytische Konzeptforschung zum Trauma und die Gedächtnisforschung der embodied cognitive science. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Roth G, Buchheim A, editors. Psychoanalyse, Neurobiologie, Trauma. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2008. p. 157–71.
Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Hautzinger M, Fiedler G, Keller W, Bahrke U, Kallenbach L, Kaufhold J, Ernst M, Negele A, Schoett M, Kuechenhoff H, Günther F, Rüger B, Beutel M. Outcome of psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral longterm-therapy with chronic depressed patients. A controlled trial with preferential and randomized allocation. Can J Psychiatry, in print.
Mancia M, editor. Psychoanalysis and neuroscience. New York: Springer; 2006.
Moser U. Was ist eine Mikrowelt? Psyche. 2013;67(5):401–31.
Norman HF, Blacker KH, Oremland JD, Barrett WG. The fate of the transference neurosis after termination of a satisfactory analysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1976;24:471–98.
Pfeffer AZ. Research in psychoanalysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1961;9:562–70.
Pincus D. Mind and brain sciences in the 21st century, by Robert L. Solso. Cambridge, 1997. Psychoanal Psychol. 2000;17:600–7.
Sandell R. Langzeitwirkung von Psychotherapie und Psychoanalyse. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Stuhr U, editors. Psychoanalysen im Rückblick. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag; 1997. p. 348–65.
Schlessinger N, Robbins F. Assessment and follow-up in psychoanalysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1974;22:542–67.
Shedler J. The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Am Psychol. 2010;65(2):98–109.
Shevrin H. The investigation of unconscious conflict, unconscious affect, and signal anxiety. In: Velmans M, editor. Investigating phenomenal consciousness: new methodologies and maps. New York: John Benjamins; 2000.
Strupp HH, Schacht TE, Henry WP. Problem – treatment – outcome congruence: a principle whose time has come. In: Dahl H, Kächele H, Thomä H, editors. Psychoanalytic process research strategies. Berlin: Springer; 1988. p. 1–14.
Toulmin S. Kritik der kollektiven Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp; 1977. p. 1983.
Varvin S. Die Oslo-Studie. Eine Prozeß-Ergebnis-Studie der Psychoanalyse – Werkstattbericht. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Stuhr U, editors. Psychoanalysen im Rückblick. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag; 1997. p. 407–14.
Vinocur de Fischbein S. Plädoyer für die interdisziplinäre konzeptuelle und klinische Erforschung von Traumnarrativen. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Canestri J, Target M, editors. Frühe Entwicklungen und ihre Störungen. Frankfurt: Brandes & Apsel; 2009. p. 252–85.
Von Helmholtz H. Handbuch der physiologischen Optik, vol. 9. Leipzig: Voss; 1867.
Wallerstein RS. Forty-two lives in treatment: a study of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press; 1986.
Wallerstein RS. The generations of psychotherapy research: an overview. Psychoanal Psychol. 2001;18:243–67.
Wallerstein RS, Robbins L, Sargent H, Luborsky L. The psychotherapy research project of the Menninger Foundation. Bull Menn Clin. 1956;20:221–80.
Weingart P. The moment of truth for science. The consequences of the ‘knowledge society’ for society and science. EMBO Rep. 2002;3:703–6.
Whitebook J. Sigmund Freud – a philosophical physician. Lecture at the 11th Joseph Sandler Research Conference: persisting shadows of early and later trauma, Frankfurt; 2010.
Widlöcher D. Foreword. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Dreher AU, Canestri J, editors. Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis. London: International Psychoanalytical Association; 2003. p. xix–xxiv.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. (2018). Concepts of Empirical and Clinical Research in Psychoanalysis and Neuropsychoanalysis. In: Boeker, H., Hartwich, P., Northoff, G. (eds) Neuropsychodynamic Psychiatry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75112-2_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75112-2_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75111-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75112-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)