Skip to main content

Authority and Politeness: Complementary Analyses of Mathematics Teaching Episodes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language and Communication in Mathematics Education

Part of the book series: ICME-13 Monographs ((ICME13Mo))

Abstract

In this chapter we juxtapose two analyses of episodes from a year 9 mathematics class. Particularly, we analyse the ways that a mathematics teacher managed authority relationships when he moved from a familiar context to an unfamiliar one in a much larger school. We build off an analysis using authority structures, following previous research. Then we compare that to an analysis based on politeness theory, with a focus on the effect of verbal acts on the participants’ faces. Additionally, we investigate how various verbal acts affect the definition of the situation. We conclude by comparing the revelations from the two conceptual frames; we claim that politeness theory may help us explain teachers’ and students’ choices of particular authority structures in their classroom interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Biddle, B. J., & Thomas, E. J. (1966). Prescriptions. In B. J. Biddle & E. J. Thomas (Eds.), Role theory: Concepts and research (pp. 103–104). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Prediger, S. (Eds.). (2014). Networking of theories as a research practice in mathematics education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & HarrĂ©, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In R. HarrĂ© & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 32–52). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1971). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin University Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1972). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin University Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HarrĂ©, R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2010). Appraising lexical bundles in mathematics classroom discourse: Obligation and choice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75, 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Wagner, D., Johnson, K., Suh, H., & Figueras, H. (2015). Positioning in mathematics education: Revelations on an imported theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1966). Norms and Behavior. In B. J. Biddle & E. J. Thomas (Eds.), Role theory: Concepts and research (pp. 134–144). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kádár, D., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1973). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 458–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, T. (1999). Pronouns in mathematical talk: Power, vagueness, and generalization. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, T. (2000). The pragmatics of mathematics education: Vagueness in mathematical discourse. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsis, K., & Dekker, R. (2010). Combining approaches for the analysis of collaborative mathematics learning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30, 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsis, K., & Koleza, E. (2008). Social and sociomathematical norms in collaborative problem solving. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsis, K., & Maj-Tatsis, B. (2017). Authority structures in preservice teachers’ talk. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (CERME10, February 1–5, 2017) (pp. 1380–1387). Dublin, Ireland: DCU Institute of Education and ERME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsis, K., & Rowland, T. (2006). Vague language in Greek and English mathematical talk: A variation study in face-work. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehliková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 5, pp. 257–264). Prague: Charles University.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Langenhove, L., & HarrĂ©, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. HarrĂ© & L. van Lagenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14–31). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2009). Re-mythologizing mathematics through attention to classroom positioning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2014). Identifying authority structures in mathematics classroom discourse: A case of a teacher’s early experience in a new context. ZDM: The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 46, 871–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, E. (2001). Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 9–24). The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 390–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos Tatsis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tatsis, K., Wagner, D. (2018). Authority and Politeness: Complementary Analyses of Mathematics Teaching Episodes. In: Moschkovich, J., Wagner, D., Bose, A., Rodrigues Mendes, J., SchĂĽtte, M. (eds) Language and Communication in Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75055-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75055-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75054-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75055-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics