Skip to main content

Digital Technologies and Pro-poor Finance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Markets from a Multidisciplinary Perspective

Abstract

Social enterprises need to be ambidextrous, i.e. simultaneously pursue social and financial goals. In this paper we focus on how digital social entrepreneurs at the base of the pyramid implement ambidextrous strategies. We draw on a case study of Rang De, India’s first platform for the delivery of credit to the poor, whose ecosystem involves multiple intermediaries and thousands of borrowers all over India. The paper identifies key actor-technology mechanisms leading to the achievement of social and financial goals, finding that the platform is instrumental to building trust amongst the social investor community and, at the same time, delivering loans at the base of the pyramid. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of pro-poor finance in the Indian context and also adds to the literature on digitally driven financial inclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As the table shows, interest is not paid to social investors on primary and higher education loans.

  2. 2.

    At our latest check (29 August 2017), 59,905 loans had been disbursed by Rang De since its establishment.

  3. 3.

    https://www.rangde.org/swabhimaan, accessed 29 August 2017.

  4. 4.

    As of August 2017 Rang De had a total of 12,768 social investors. A total of £7.7 million has been disbursed as loans.

References

  • Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. (2015). The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(1), 22–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, C., & Heeks, R. (2013). Innovation and scaling of ICT for the bottom-of-the-pyramid. Journal of Information Technology, 28(4), 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2016). Ambidexterity for corporate social performance. Organization Studies, 37(2), 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L., & Christensen, C. M. (2002). The great leap: Driving innovation from the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R., & Arun, S. (2010). Social outsourcing as a development tool: The impact of outsourcing IT services to women's social enterprises in Kerala. Journal of International Development, 22(4), 441–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, S. K., Pinsonneault, A., & Dubé, L. (2016). The evolution of an ICT platform-enabled ecosystem for poverty alleviation: The case of eKutir. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 431–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuriyan, R., Nafus, D., & Mainwaring, S. (2012). Consumption, technology, and development: The “poor” as “consumer”. Information Technologies & International Development, 8(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuriyan, R., Toyama, K., & Ray, I. (2006). Integrating social development and financial sustainability: The challenges of rural computer kiosks in Kerala. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Berkeley (CA), 25-26 May 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madon, S. (2005). Governance lessons from the experience of telecentres in Kerala. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(4), 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas, I., & Radcliffe, D. (2010). Mobile payments go viral: M-PESA in Kenya. Working Paper for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, November 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masiero, S. (2011). Financial vs social sustainability of telecentres: Mutual exclusion or mutual reinforcement? The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 45(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayasandra, R., Pan, S. L., & Myers, M. D. (2006). Viewing information technology outsourcing organisations through a postcolonial lens. In E. Trauth, D. Howcroft, T. Butler, B. Fitzgerald, & J. De Gross (Eds.), Social inclusion, societal and organisational implications for information systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2004). Realizing information systems: Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Information and Organization, 14(2), 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2012). Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravishankar, M. N. (2013). Public ICT innovations: A strategic ambiguity perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 28(4), 316–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandeep, M. S., & Ravishankar, M. N. (2015). Social innovations in outsourcing: An empirical investigation of impact sourcing companies in India. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(4), 270–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. New York, NY: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Masiero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Masiero, S., Ravishankar, M.N. (2018). Digital Technologies and Pro-poor Finance. In: Dwivedi, Y., et al. Emerging Markets from a Multidisciplinary Perspective. Advances in Theory and Practice of Emerging Markets. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75013-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics