Skip to main content

In the Wake of Disaster: Resilient Organizing and a New Path for the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Organizations Manage the Future

Abstract

High-hazard organizations are unique due to their susceptibility to disasters that can have grave consequences not just for the organization but also for stakeholders, the communities in which they operate and the environment. Though prominence is placed on understanding how high-hazard organizations avoid such events, how they create a new future when such an event does occur is underexplored. The purpose of this chapter, thus, is to investigate how organizations create a new future in the wake of a disaster through resilient organizing. Using an instrumental case study methodology, this study investigates how executives at British Petroleum (BP), a high-hazard organization, embodied resilient organizing following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. We show how resilient organizing helped BP bounce back and beyond by learning from the disaster, finding resolve, refocusing and experiencing transformation through action. In doing so, BP endeavored to prepare for, build, cultivate and commit to a new future. Insights from this research point to resilient organizing as a promising strategy for creating a new future and suggest future avenues for research on resilient organizing in high-hazard contexts and beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldrich, Howard, and Diane Herker. 1977. Boundary Spanning Roles and Organization Structure. Academy of Management Review 2 (2): 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, Albert. 1990. Perceived Self-Efficacy in the Exercise of Control over AIDS Infection. Evaluation and Program Planning 13: 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, Pamela S., J.L. Stimpert, and Anne S. Huff. 1993. Cognitive Change, Strategic Action and Organizational Renewal. Strategic Management Journal 13 (S1): 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, Ilídio. 2010. Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future. Journal of Management 36 (1): 256–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, James G. 2002. The Relationship of Perceived Leadership Behaviors to Organizational Efficacy. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 9 (2): 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, John S. 1998. Organizational Learning Activities in High-Hazard Industries: The Logics Underlying Self-Analysis. Journal of Management Studies 35 (6): 699–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, John S., Jenny W. Rudolph, and Sachi Hatakenaka. 2002. Learning from Experience in High-Hazard Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 24: 87–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Ming-Jer, and Danny Miller. 2015. Reconceptualizing Competitive Dynamics: A Multidimensional Framework. Strategic Management Journal 36 (5): 758–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, John W. 2012. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, Francis, Franz T. Lohrke, Charles J. Fornaciari, and R. Andrew Turner. 2004. Slack Resources and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Business Research 57 (6): 565–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Jason P., Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, and Christopher B. Bingham. 2009. Optimal Structure, Market Dynamism, and the Strategy of Simple Rules. Administrative Science Quarterly 54 (3): 413–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, Nicolai J., Jacob Lyngsie, and Shaker A. Zahra. 2013. The Role of External Knowledge Sources and Organizational Design in the Process of Opportunity Exploitation. Strategic Management Journal 34 (12): 1453–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaba, David M. 2000. Structural and Organizational Issues in Patient Safety: A Comparison of Health Care to Other High-Hazard Industries. California Management Review 43 (1): 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali, Devi R., and Ravindranath Madhavan. 2001. Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective. Academy of Management Review 26: 431–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, Sean T., Mary Uhl-Bien, Bruce J. Avolio, and Fabrice L. Cavarretta. 2009. A Framework for Examining Leadership in Extreme Contexts. The Leadership Quarterly 20 (6): 897–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, Constance E., and Jeffrey A. Martin. 2015. Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Review and Assessment of Managerial Impact on Strategic Change. Journal of Management 41 (5): 1281–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, Christina, Richard M. Locke, and Cate Reavis. 2012. BP and the Deepwater Horizon Disaster of 2010. MIT Sloan Management Case Collection 10 (110): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobasa, Suzanne C., Salvatore R. Maddi, and Stephen Kahn. 1982. Hardiness and Health: A Prospective Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42 (1): 168–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPorte, Todd R., and Paula M. Consolini. 1991. Working in Practice but Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of ‘High-Reliability Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART 1 (1): 19–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengnick-Hall, Cynthia A., Tammy E. Beck, and Mark L. Lengnick-Hall. 2011. Developing a Capacity for Organizational Resilience Through Strategic Human Resource Management. Human Resource Management Review 21 (3): 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limnios, Mamouni, Elena Alexandra, Tim Mazzarol, Anas Ghadouani, and Steven G.M. Schilizzi. 2014. The Resilience Architecture Framework: Four Organizational Archetypes. European Management Journal 32 (1): 104–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, Juan A. 2010. Tar Balls in Texas Mean Oil Hits All 5 Gulf States. The Associated Press, July 6. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-07-05-Texas-oil-spill_N.htm.

  • Luthans, Fred, Carolyn M. Youssef, and Bruce J. Avolio. 2007. Psychological Capital: Investing and Developing Positive Organizational Behavior. In Positive Organizational Behaviour, ed. D. Nelson and C. Cooper. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, Peter M. 2008. These Lives Will Not Be Lost in Vain: Organizational Learning from Disaster in U.S. Coal Mining. Organization Science 20 (5): 861–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, Joshua D., and Paul G. Stoltz. 2010. How to Bounce Back from Adversity. Harvard Business Review 88 (1–2): 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Alan D. 1982. Adapting to Environmental Jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly 27 (4): 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Alan D., Vibha Gaba, and Kenneth A. Colwell. 2005. Organizing far from Equilibrium: Nonlinear Change in Organizational Fields. Organization Science 16 (5): 456–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milosevic, Ivana, A. Erin Bass, and Gwendolyn Combs. 2016. The Paradox of Knowledge Creation in a High-Reliability Organization: A Case Study. Journal of Management doi: 0149206315599215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Richard N., James G. Hunt, and Lawrence R. Jauch. 2002. Toward a Contextual Theory of Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 13 (6): 797–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, Charles. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Ryan W., and Monica C. Worline. 2008. Enabling Courageous Collective Action: Conversations from United Airlines Flight 93. Organization Science 19 (4): 497–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radzevick, Joseph R., and Don A. Moore. 2011. Competing to Be Certain (But Wrong): Market Dynamics and Excessive Confidence in Judgment. Management Science 57 (1): 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, Sebastian, Julian Birkinshaw, Gilbert Probst, and Michael L. Tushman. 2009. Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance. Organization Science 20 (4): 685–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Karlene H. 1989. New Challenges in Organizational Research: High Reliability Organizations. Organization & Environment 3 (2): 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, Michael J, and Charlene Zietsma. 2008. Responding to Weak Signals: An Empirical Investigation of Emergent Adaptive Capabilities. OLKC 2008, The International Conference on Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities. Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilke, Oliver. 2014. On the Contingent Value of Dynamic Capabilities for Competitive Advantage: The Nonlinear Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism. Strategic Management Journal 35 (2): 179–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, Robert E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1994. Grounded Theory Methodology. Handbook of Qualitative Research 17: 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, Mary, and Russ Marion. 2009. Complexity Leadership in Bureaucratic Forms of Organizing: A Meso Model. The Leadership Quarterly 20 (4): 631–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Vegt, Gerben S., Peter Essens, Margareta Wahlström, and Gerard George. 2015. Managing Risk and Resilience. Academy of Management Journal 58 (4): 971–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, Glenn B., Deepak Sirdeshmukh, and Zannie Giraud Voss. 2008. The Effects of Slack Resources and Environmental Threat on Product Exploration and Exploitation. Academy of Management Journal 51 (1): 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Heli, Jaepil Choi, Guoguang Wan, and John Qi Dong. 2016. Slack Resources and the Rent-Generating Potential of Firm-Specific Knowledge. Journal of Management 42 (2): 500–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E. 2010. Reflections on Enacted Sensemaking in the Bhopal Disaster. Journal of Management Studies 47: 537–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E., and Karlene H. Roberts. 1993. Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (3): 357–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E., and Kathleen M. Sutcliffe. 2011. Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty. Vol. 8. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E., Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, and Davide Obstfeld. 2008. Organizing for High Reliability: Processes of Collective Mindfulness. Crisis Management 3 (1): 81–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Trenton A., Daniel A. Gruber, Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, Dean A. Shepherd, and Eric Yanfei Zhao. 2017. Organizational Response to Adversity: Fusing Crisis Management and Resilience Research Streams. Academy of Management Annals 11 (2): 733–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef, Carolyn M., and Fred Luthans. 2007. Positive Organizational Behavior in the Workplace. Journal of Management 33 (5): 774–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Erin Bass, A., Milosevic, I. (2018). In the Wake of Disaster: Resilient Organizing and a New Path for the Future. In: Krämer, H., Wenzel, M. (eds) How Organizations Manage the Future. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74506-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics