Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why Worry About Your Impact? Rationale, Challenges and Support for Indian Social Enterprises’ Impact Measurement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Business Models

Abstract

For social enterprises, the impact assessment practice can serve as an important differentiator from its commercial competitors, particularly while attracting impact-focused capital. The development and implementation of impact assessment tools for social enterprises have piqued the interest of academicians as much as it has challenged the practitioners. Followed by a discussion of how social impact is conceptualized in theory, this chapter studies the actual tools used by social enterprises in practice. Recognizing that the interdependence between social enterprises and their funders is deeper as compared with other stakeholders, the chapter details the various tools developed by and for impact investors. It also reviews the challenges and the support available for impact assessment for social enterprises in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, T., Gawande, R., & Overdyke, S. (2015). Innovations in impact measurement: Lessons using mobile technology from Acumen’s Lean Data initiative and Root Capital’s Client-Centric Mobile Measurement. Retrieved from http://acumen.org/ideas/lean-data/

  • Allen, S., Bhatt, A., Ganesh, U., & Kulkarni, N. (2012). On the path to sustainability and scale: A study of India’s social enterprise landscape. Mumbai: Intellecap.

    Google Scholar 

  • B-Analytics. (2017). GIIRS funds. Retrieved from B-Analytics: http://b-analytics.net/giirs-funds

  • Bacq, S., Hartog, C., & Hoogendoorn, B. (2016). Beyond the moral portrayal of social entrepreneurs: An empirical approach to who they are and what drives them. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 703–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barraket, J., & Yousefpour, N. (2013). Evaluation and social impact measurement amongst small to medium social enterprises: Process, purpose and value. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72(4), 447–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassi, A., & Vincenti, G. (2015). Toward a new metrics for the evaluation of the social added value of social enterprises. CIRIEC—España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 83, 9–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Council. (2016). The state of social enterprise in Bangladesh, Ghana, India, and Pakistan: The state of social enterprise in India. British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst Management Services. (2016). Impact measures. Retrieved from The Catalyst Management Services: http://www.cms.org.in/services-impact-measures

  • Cecilia, G., Michelini, L., & Iasevoli, G. (2015, December). Measuring value creation in social enterprises. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1173–1193. 21p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chell, E., Spence, L. J., Perrini, F., & Harris, J. D. (2016). Social entrepreneurship and business ethics: Does social equal ethical? Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 619–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (2012). A new world of metrics: Trends in monitoring social return. In Investing for impact: How social entrepreneurship is redefining the meaning of return (pp. 31–36).

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, E., & Pesci, C. (2016). Social impact measurement: Why do stakeholders matter? Sustainability Accounting, Management & Policy Journal, 7(1), 99–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, M. T. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76, 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16, 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutt, N., Ganesh, U., Chandrasekaran, P., Agarwal, P., Patil, S., & Gupta, A. (2014). Invest catalyze mainstream: The India impact investing story. Mumbai: Intellecap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2014). What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • GIZ. (2012). Enablers for change—A market landscape of the Indian social enterprise ecosystem. New Delhi, India: Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Impact Investing Network. (2017). IRIS metrics. Retrieved from IRIS https://iris.thegiin.org/metrics?filters=agriculture

  • Gooptu, B. (2012, September 21). Power of Ideas 2012: NASE, a new voice to boost India’s social ventures. Retrieved May 1, 2017, from The Economic Times: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/power-of-ideas-2012-nase-a-new-voice-to-boost-indias-social-ventures/articleshow/16485116.cms

  • Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Camón-Cala, J. (2016). A credit score system for socially responsible lending. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 691–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haski-Leventhal, D., & Mehra, A. (2015). Impact measurement in social enterprises: Australia and India. Social Enterprise Journal, 12, 78–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indian Impact Investors Council. (2016). Prabhav 2016. Proceedings Report, November 15–17, 2016. Gurgaon, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innovations for Poverty Action. (2017). Poverty data use cases—About the PPI. Retrieved May 1, 2017, from Progress out of Poverty: http://www.progressoutofpoverty.org/poverty-data-use-cases

  • Intellecap. (2016). About PRISM. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from Prism for Impact: http://prismforimpact.com/about-prism/

  • Kaplan, R. S. (2010). Conceptual foundations of the balanced scorecard. Working Paper 10-074. Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. (1992, January–February). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79. (Reprint #92105.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, N. (2014). Landscape study of SESOs: Understanding information flow and strategies for impact measurement. A White Paper, with an India Focus. Villgro Innovations Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legatum Foundation. (2017). Social impact index: Measuring performance. Retrieved from Legatum Foundation http://www.legatum.org/sii

  • McKinsey. (2017). Social impact assessment portal. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from McKinsey & Company: http://mckinseyonsociety.com/social-impact-assessment/

  • McLoughlin, J., Kaminski, J., Sodagar, B., Khan, S., Harris, R., Arnaudo, G., & McBrearty, S. (2009). A strategic approach to social impact measurement of social enterprises: The SIMPLE methodology. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(2), 154–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molecke, G., & Pinkse, J. (2016). Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 550–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natu, J., Singh, D., Shandilya, D., & Jaiswal, S. (2016). Social value economy: A survey of the social enterprise landscape in India. British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, L., Szkudlarek, B., & Seymour, R. G. (2015). Social impact measurement in social enterprises: An interdependence perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 32(4), 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niiti Consulting. (2017). Impact measurement design. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from Impact Measurement Design: http://www.niiticonsulting.com/impact-measurement-design.php

  • Noya, A. (2015). Social impact measurement for social enterprises. Luxembourg: OECD Publishing & European Commission.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • San India. (2010). About us. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from Social Audit Network, India: http://www.san-india.org/about-sanindia.html

  • Sekar, U. (2015). Impact measurement: The Unitus Seed Fund Way. Unitus Seed Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, K. J., & Whitley, T. (2016). Applying social return on investment (SROI) to the built environment. Building Research & Information, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IIM Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad, India

    Anar Bhatt

Authors
  1. Anar Bhatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Anirudh Agrawal

  2. BML Munjal University, Haryana, India

    Payal Kumar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bhatt, A. (2018). Why Worry About Your Impact? Rationale, Challenges and Support for Indian Social Enterprises’ Impact Measurement. In: Agrawal, A., Kumar, P. (eds) Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Business Models. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74488-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation