Skip to main content

Donald Trump: Shakespeare’s Lord of Misrule

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1027 Accesses

Abstract

The so-called New Historicism in literary studies began with a disconcerting insight borrowed from Foucault that was applied to Shakespeare’s history plays: namely, that subversive opposition has a way of reinforcing Power. The plays seem to invite subversive skepticism by highlighting the fraudulence and Machiavellian calculation behind the workings of Power. And yet, somehow, as Henry V leads his outnumbered troops in battle against the French, audiences and readers invariably get swept away by nationalistic passions (“We few, we happy few, we band of brothers”). My essay explores how the history plays illuminate the phenomenon of Donald Trump, whose improbable rise has been so crucially fueled by relentless subversive opposition. The essay looks in particular at how Trump combines the Machiavellian cunning of Prince Hal with the shameless but subversive egomania and excess of Falstaff to become a Lord of Misrule that feeds on opposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a great introduction to this topic, see Geoffrey Galt Harpham, “Foucault and the New Historicism,” American Literary History 3.2 (1991): 360–75.

  2. 2.

    Ibid., 372.

  3. 3.

    Henry V , John Russell Brown, ed. (New York: The Signet Classic Shakespeare, 1988a): 5.3.60. All further references to this play will be to this text.

  4. 4.

    1 Henry IV , Part 1, Maynard Mack, ed. (New York: The Signet Classic Shakespeare, 1988b): 3.2.132. All further references to this play will be to this text.

  5. 5.

    E.M.W. Tillyard, Shakespeare’s History Plays (London: Chatto & Windus, 1944), 17–21.

  6. 6.

    In his comprehensive study of the Morality pattern, Bernard Spivack, for instance, asserts that Falstaff’s “banishment and imprisonment are regular punishments for the Vice” (Shakespeare and the Allegory of Evil [New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1958], 204).

  7. 7.

    See, for example, Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfield, “History and ideology: the instance of Henry V,” in John Drakakis, ed. Alternative Shakespeares (London and New York: Methuen, 1985): 206–27.

  8. 8.

    See, for example, Graham Holderness’s Shakespeare’s History (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1985), in which he suggests that the plays “affirm the reality of historical transformation, and imagine the infinite possibilities of change” (131). In this connection, see also Walter Cohen, “Political Criticism of Shakespeare,” in Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in Ideology and History, ed. Jean E. Howard and Marion F. O’Conner (New York and London: Methuen, 1987), in which he challenges the “leftist disillusionment” (36) seen in new historicist emphasis on the “triumph of containment” (35), and attempts to retrieve the ways in which the Henry IV plays can generate “subversive religious, social, and political ideologies” (36). See also Michael Bristol, Carnival and Theater (NY: Methuen, 1985).

  9. 9.

    “Invisible Bullets,” in Shakespearean Negotiations (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press), 55–6.

  10. 10.

    Henry IV , Part 2, Norman Holland, ed. (New York: The Signet Classic Shakespeare, 1988c), 4.5.213–14. All further references to this play will be to this text.

  11. 11.

    See, for example, C. L. Barber, Shakespeare’s Festive Comedy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959), especially, “Rule and Misrule in Henry IV.”

  12. 12.

    Phillip Stubbes, Anatomie of Abuses … in the Country of Ailgna (London, 1583), 148. Quoted in Barber, Shakespeare’s Festive Comedy, 28.

  13. 13.

    Rabelais and His World, Hélène Iswolsky, trans. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984), 10.

  14. 14.

    See, for instance, A. P. Rossiter, Angel with Horns (NY: Theatre Arts Books, 1961), 46.

  15. 15.

    See, for instance, Muzaffar Chishti, Sarah Pierce, and Jessica Bolter, “The Obama Record on Deportations: Deporter in Chief or Not?” Migration Policy Institute, January 26, 2017: http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/obama-record-deportations-deporter-chief-or-not.

  16. 16.

    See Donna Borak and Henry Williams, “Where Trump Stands on Wall Street,” The Wall Street Journal, November 9, 2016: http://graphics.wsj.com/elections/2016/where-trump-stands-on-wall-street/.

  17. 17.

    For a video of the conversation and a transcript, see “Transcript: Donald Trump’s Taped Comments About Women,” The New York Times, October 8, 2016: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/donald-trump-tape-transcript.html?mcubz=0.

  18. 18.

    For a picture, see: https://www.mediaite.com/online/people-are-losing-it-over-a-woman-whose-shirt-says-trump-can-grab-her-you-know/.

  19. 19.

    See FiveThirtyEight: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/clinton-couldnt-win-over-white-women/.

  20. 20.

    See Jeff Manza and Ned Crowley, “Working Class Hero? Interrogating the Social Bases of the Rise of Donald Trump,” The Forum 15.1 (2017): 3–28.

References

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Translated by Hélène Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, C.L. Shakespeare’s Festive Comedy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristol, Michael. Carnival and Theater. New York: Methuen, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Graham. “Political Criticism of Shakespeare.” In Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in Ideology and History, eds. Jean E. Howard and Marion F. O’Conner. New York and London: Methuen, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollimore, Jonathan, and Alan Sinfield. “History and Ideology: The Instance of Henry V.” In Alternative Shakespeares, ed. John Drakakis. London and New York: Methuen, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, Stephen. Shakespearean Negotiations. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpham, Geoffrey Galt. “Foucault and the New Historicism.” American Literary History 3, no. 2 (1991): 360–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holderness, Graham. Shakespeare’s History. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manza, Jeff, and Ned Crowley. “Working Class Hero? Interrogating the Social Bases of the Rise of Donald Trump.” The Forum 15, no. 1 (2017): 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, A.P. Angel with Horns. New York: Theatre Arts Books, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William. Henry V. Edited by John Russell Brown. New York: The Signet Classic Shakespeare, 1988a.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1 Henry IV, Part 1. Edited by Maynard Mack. New York: The Signet Classic Shakespeare, 1988b.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Henry IV, Part 2. Edited by Norman Holland. New York: The Signet Classic Shakespeare, 1988c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivack, Bernard. Shakespeare and the Allegory of Evil. New York: Columbia University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillyard, E.M.W. Shakespeare’s History Plays. London: Chatto & Windus, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ko, Y.J. (2018). Donald Trump: Shakespeare’s Lord of Misrule. In: Jaramillo Torres, A., Sable, M. (eds) Trump and Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74445-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics