Abstract
In 1952–1953 Martin Beckmann proposed one of the most ingenious models that ever appeared in economics; for interregional commodity trade and pricing. In his short first article the entire problem was set in form of two short partial differential equations. For comparison, Paul Samuelson the same year dealt with the same problem for a discrete set of locations, in a way which makes an extremely clumsy impression if one has ever seen Beckmann’s model (and understood it, which has been difficult for economists unfamiliar with differential operators other than derivatives). The main idea is that there are local excess supplies and demands that have to be levelled through trade in a 2D space region, and that there is a given transport cost field reflecting local transport facilities. The solution is that local price reflects local scarcity and that trade flows in the direction of the price gradient as reflecting maximum earnings from transportation. Moreover, competition among transporters puts a pressure on profit margins so that in the flow direction price differences exactly equal transportation cost. Later, in 1977 Beckmann proposed a dynamic version of the model, for temporal price change and reorientation of trade flow. This provides the basis for the proposed discretized model in this stub. We consider two alternatives, the full model, which has a number of snags, and a simpler model involving just interregional price formation which can be distilled and separated from the complete model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
They were studied in Beckmann and Puu (1985).
- 2.
In Beckmann’s model transport cost can also depend on the direction of transit, which is relevant, for instance, if we have a distance metric different from the Euclidean, for instance a Manhattan metric.
- 3.
A piece of warning is in place here. On the computer π is not an exact number, even if we define it through, for instance, \(4\arctan \left ( 1\right ) \). Hence \(\left ( \cos \left ( \left ( r-1\right ) \frac {\pi }{2} \right ) ,\sin \left ( \left ( r-1\right ) \frac {\pi }{2}\right ) \right ) \) does not return a pair of integers, except for the case r = 1. As we want to use the numbers for indices we must invent some more roundabout way for determining gradient directions.
- 4.
A programmer more expert than the present author should be able to invent some clever computational procedure based on this idea.
References
Beckmann MJ (1952) A continuous model of transportation. Econometrica 20:643–660
Beckmann MJ (1953) The partial equilibrium of a continuous space market. Welwirtschaftliches Arch 71:73–89
Beckmann MJ (1977) Equilibrium and stability in a continuous space market. Oper Res Verfahren 14:48–63
Beckmann MJ, Puu T (1985) Spatial economics: potential, density, and flow. North Holland Publishing Company, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Puu, T. (2018). CAUDEX OCTAVUS. In: Disequilibrium Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74415-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74415-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74414-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74415-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)