Abstract
We study the impact of venture capitalists on startup success using social network analysis. Using multiple sources, we compile a unique dataset of 3199 US-based technology startups and their board members, from which we generate and analyze the interlocking directorates network (formal network) and the Twitter activity network (informal network). We define three metrics of success: startup funding (collected from Crunchbase), annual sales (collected from OneSource), and return-on-investment (annual sales/funding). We find that startups with more VCs on their board are more centrally located in the formal network, tend to receive greater funding, have greater annual sales, yet a smaller return-on-investment. We also find that VCs are significantly more central in the Twitter network than non-VCs, and they have greater Twitter popularity (number of followers/number of people they follow). Interestingly, VCs tweet significantly less than non-VCs. Our results indicate that VCs carry a significant amount of capital, both financially as well as socially, which they transmit to the startups they become involved with, yet they tend to invest disproportionately to startup revenue (hence lower ROI).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amit, R., Brander, J., & Zott, C. (1998). Why do venture capital firms exist? Theory and Canadian evidence. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 441.
Bernstein, S., Giroud, X., & Townsend, R. R. (2015). The impact of venture capital monitoring. The Journal of Finance, 71, 1591–1622.
Chan, Y. S. (1983). On the positive role of financial intermediation in allocation of venture capital in market with imperfect information. Journal of Finance, 35(5), 1543–1568.
Chemmanur, Thomas J., Krishnan, K., & Nandy, Debarshi K. (2008). How does venture capital financing improve efficiency in private firms? A look beneath the surface. US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper No. CES-WP-08-16.
Franklin, B., & Haque, M. (2016, March). National Venture Capital Association yearbook. New York: Thomson Reuters.
Gloor, P. A. (2005). Swarm creativity: Competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
Hellmann, T. (2000). Venture capitalists: The coaches of Silicon Valley. In W. Miller, C. M. Lee, M. G. Hanock, & H. Rowen (Eds.), The Silicon Valley edge: A habitat for innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 267–294). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hellmann, T., & Puri, M. (2002). Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Finance, 57, 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00419
Higashide, H., & Birley, S. (2002). The consequences of conflict between the venture capitalist and the entrepreneurial team in the United Kingdom from the perspective of the venture capitalist. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(1), 59–81.
Jee, C. (2016, July 25). Why you should avoid venture capitalists. Techworld (Web).
Kaplan, S. N., & Strömberg, P. (2003). Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 281.
Khanin, D., & Turel, O. (2013). Conflicts between venture capitalists and CEOs of their Portfolio companies. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 23(1), 31–54.
Lahr, H., & Mina, A. (2016). Venture capital investments and the technological performance of portfolio firms. Research Policy, 45, 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.001
Lerner, J. (1995). Venture capitalists and the oversight of private firms. Journal of Finance, 50, 301–318.
Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directories. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271–298.
Mullins, J. (2014, November 05). VC funding can be bad for your start-up. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2014/08/vc-funding-can-be-bad-for-your-start-up
Pommet, S. (2017). The impact of the quality of VC financing and monitoring on the survival of IPO firms. Managerial Finance, 43(4), 440.
Reve, T., & Stern, L. W. (1989). The relationship between interorganizational form, transaction climate, and economic performance in vertical interfirm dyads. In L. Pellegrini & S. K. Reddy (Eds.), Marketing channels: Relationship and performance. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Wang, C. K., et al. (2003). Effects of venture capitalists’ participation in listed companies. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 2015–2034.
Wright, M., & Robbie, K. (1998). Venture capital and private equity: A review and synthesis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 25(5–6), 521–570.
Wu, A., Jin, F., & Hitt L. (2015, July). Social is the new financial: How startups’ social media activities influence funding outcomes (Working Paper).
Xi, Y., & Su-Sheng, W. (2016). Do venture capital firms play as supportive mentors or free-riders? Evidence from China. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 22(4), 3–18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hadley, B., Gloor, P.A., Woerner, S.L., Zhou, Y. (2018). Analyzing VC Influence on Startup Success: A People-Centric Network Theory Approach. In: Grippa, F., Leitão, J., Gluesing, J., Riopelle, K., Gloor, P. (eds) Collaborative Innovation Networks. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74295-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74295-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74294-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74295-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)