Abstract
The paper is dedicated to the analysis of the condition of the Russian scientific sphere. After the breakup of the Soviet Union, science was in stagnation because of numerous problems such as lack of systematization, bad conditions for scientists’ work, and many others. To solve those problems nowadays, funding has been increased, additional motivational factors have been added, and measures have been implemented to decrease corruption in scientific sphere. According to forecast, in 2019–2020 condition of science will improve, and Russia will strengthen its positions in the global ratings. This article covers the issues of establishment of the Russian science and presents generalized data in graph forms. These data concern global rating, expenditure, budget, and position of Russia in comparison with other developed countries. The analysis is an inseparable part of a scientific article as it allows to follow the dynamics of the development of the Russian science. It is essential that this paper has a very clear focus and practical importance strengthened by target setting, analysis of the problem, and marked directions of its problem-solving in order to improve indicators of statistic data as well as indicators connected with leadership and dominance implied in real life.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alimo Metcalfe B, Alban Metcalfe RJ (2001) The development of a new transformational leadership questionnaire. J Occup Organ Psychol 74(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317901167208
Appelt S, Galindo-Rueda F, de Pinho R, van Beuzekom B (2015) Which factors influence the international mobility of research scientists? OECD Science, Technology and Industry, Working Paper 2015/02
Chiabai A, Platt S, Strielkowski W (2014) Eliciting users’ preferences for cultural heritage and tourism-related e-services: a tale of three European cities. Tour Econ 20(2):263–277. https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2013.0290
Federal state statistics service (2017) Data on the number of organizations engaged in research and development, the number of researchers. http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/science_and_innovations/science/#. Accessed 11 Oct 2017
Fischer T (2017) Leadership process models: a review and synthesis. J Manag 6:1726–1753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316682830
Gulicheva E, Osipova M (2017) Program-target method of pricing for international educational services. Czech J Soc Sci Bus Econ 6(1):21–27. https://doi.org/10.24984/cjssbe.2017.6.1.3
Jiroudková A, Rovná LA, Strielkowski W, Ĺ losarÄŤĂk I (2015) EU accession, transition and further integration for the countries of central and eastern Europe. Econ Soc 8(2):11–25. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2015/8-2/1
Koudelková P, Svobodová P (2014) Knowledge creation & sharing as essential determinants of SMEs innovation. Int Econ Lett 3(1):12–20. https://doi.org/10.24984/iel.2014.3.1.3
Le Mouel M, Squicciarini M (2015) Cross-country estimates of employment and investment in organisational capital: a task-based methodology using the PIAAC database. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, OECD Publishing (forthcoming)
OECD (2015a) Frascati Manual 2015. Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development, the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. OECD Publishing, Paris
OECD (2015b) Connecting to knowledge. OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard, p 125–153
Petrova Y (2016) Innovative leadership. Almanac Mod Sci Educ 65:1–15
Ratai NV (2016) Science in Russia and the leading countries of the world. Science, technology, innovation. https://issek.hse.ru/data/2016/09/20/1123278216/NTI_N_19_20092016.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2017
Shishkin AV (2012) Strategic guidelines for the integration of education, science and business: international experience. Bull Altai Sci 3(2):131–133
Strielkowski W, Höschle F (2016) Evidence for economic convergence in the EU: the analysis of past EU enlargements. Technol Econ Dev Econ 22(4):617–630. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.890138
Zielińska A (2016) Information as a market product and information markets. Czech J Soc Sci Bus Econ 5(4):31–38. https://doi.org/10.24984/cjssbe.2016.5.4.4
Zlyvko O, Lisin E, Rogalev N, Kurdiukova G (2014) Analysis of the concept of industrial technology platform development in Russia and in the EU. Int Econ Lett 3(4):124–138. https://doi.org/10.24984/iel.2014.3.4.2
Acknowledgments
The article is prepared within the implementation of a project part of a state assignment on request of Ministry of Education of Russian Federation. The topic of the task is “Development of methodological background and organizational-economic mechanism of strategic management of economic security of Russia” (Assignment No. 26.3913.2017/ПЧ).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Goncharenko, L., Sybachin, S., Savchenko, I. (2018). The Analysis of Leadership in Russian Scientific Sphere. In: Strielkowski, W., Chigisheva, O. (eds) Leadership for the Future Sustainable Development of Business and Education. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74216-8_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74216-8_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74215-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74216-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)