Abstract
This work proposes that a historically delimited study can offer teachers the opportunity to problematize with students the historicity of scientific knowledge and its social, economic, pedagogical, and philosophical implications. The authors intend to draw attention to the centrality of chemical knowledge in modern scientific culture and how chemistry teaching is a manifestation of that social interest. Francis Bacon’s new program for natural history in the seventeenth century, more specifically his view of the history of arts, was adopted as the core idea of the work.
The first goal is to describe the reasons that made chemistry the fundamental knowledge of Bacon’s new program. The purpose is to point out the shared objectives between the natural history of arts and chemistry teaching, as laid out in the manuals and courses inspired by the lessons about the Baconian chemical philosophy of the physician–chemist Herman Boerhaave and his French “disciples.” The authors highlight the case of the chemist Guyton de Morveau and his group at the Dijon Academy, not only for their pedagogical innovations but, above all, for their central role in French chemistry at the end of the eighteenth century and their active participation in the reformulation of chemical nomenclature. However, they point out that this linguistic–conceptual revolution also marked a pedagogical rupture, in which the history of chemistry was no longer necessary for the learning of this science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
We are aware of the complexity of defining what the “Baconian program” of knowledge is. In the present work, we use the traditional definition by T. Kuhn. The Baconian program can be understood as “a new cluster of research areas that owed their status as sciences to the seventeenth century’s characteristic insistence upon experimentation and upon the compilation of natural histories, including histories of the crafts. To this second group belong particularly the study of heat, of electricity, of magnetism, and of chemistry” (Kuhn 1961, p. 186). Thus, this “program” of knowledge includes the quantification of aspects, construction of technical instruments, reproducibility, communities of people of science working cooperatively, new techniques and methods, and natural philosophers working in laboratories (Sukopp 2013, p. 58).
- 2.
“When Bacon uses History in these experimental and natural histories it includes, for instance, names of winds, what people have said about them, when they blow, where they come from, and what they do to trees and plants […]. The history of the longevity of humans begins with a collection of textual evidence. The history of the circulation of the blood not only tells how blood might move, but also facts relevant to circulation and heating” (Miller 2005, pp. 358–359). Thus, Miller argues that history, in Baconian terms, indicates, on the one hand, a preliminary work in which the facts are reported and informed numerous times and thus, taught, and presents subsequent elaborations, including the experimental ones; and, on the other, this history must include the structure and functioning of nature.
References
Aristotle. (1984). Metaphysics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle (Vol. 2, pp. 1552–1728). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bacon, F. (1963a). Advancement of learning. In J. Spedding, R. Leslie, & D. D. Heath (Eds.), The works of Francis Bacon (Vol. III, pp. 253–491). London: Longman.
Bacon, F. (1963b). Novus Orbis Scientiarum, sive Desiderata. In J. Spedding, R. Leslie, & D. D. Heath (Eds.), The works of Francis Bacon (Vol. I, pp. 838–840). London: Longman.
Bacon, F. (1963c). Description of a natural and experimental history. In J. Spedding, R. Leslie, & D. D. Heath (Eds.), The works of Francis Bacon (Vol. IV, pp. 251–263). London: Longman.
Bacon, F. (2006). Historia vitae & mortis. In G. Rees (Ed.), The Oxford Francis Bacon (Vol. 12, pp. 142–377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bacon, F. (2007). Historia densi & rare. In G. Rees (Ed.), The Oxford Francis Bacon (Vol. 13, pp. 36–169). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2003). La nature laboratoire. In I. B. Bensaude-Vincent & B. Bernardi (Eds.), Rousseau et les sciences (pp. 155–174). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Bensaude-Vincent, B., & Simon, J. (2008). Chemistry: The impure science. London: Imperial College Press.
Bensaude-Vincent, B., Belmar, A., & Bertomeu, J. R. (2003). L’émergence d’une science des manuels. Paris: Éditions des Archives Contemporaines.
Boerhaave, H. (1753). A new method of chemistry. Translated from the original Latin of Dr. Boerhaave Elementa Chemiae by Peter Shaw. London: Longman.
Boyle, R. (1999). The works of Robert Boyle (Vol. 3, M. Hunter &, E. Davis, Eds.). London: Pickering & Chatto.
Brasil, Ministério da Educação. (2000). Parâmetros Curriculares para o Ensino Médio. Brasília: Ministério da Educação.
Brasil, Ministério da Educação. (2006). Orientações Curriculares para o Ensino Médio (Vol. 3). Brasília: Ministério da Educação.
Bret, P. (Org.). (2016). Louis-Bernard Guyton, “l’illustre chimiste de la République”. Annales historiques de la Révolution française, 383. Paris: Armand Colin.
Crosland, M. P. (1978). Historical studies in the language of chemistry. New York: Dover Publications.
Debus, A. G. (1977). The chemical philosophy. Mineola: Dover Publications.
Diderot, D. ([1875] 2005). De l’interprétation de la nature. Paris: Flammarion.
Giglioni, G. (2012). Historia and materia: The implications of Francis Bacon’s natural history. Early Science and Medicine, 17, 62–86.
Guyton de Morveau, L.-B. (1782). Mémoire sur les dénominations chimiques, la nécessité d’en perfectionner le système, les règles pour y parvenir, suivi d’un tableau d’une nomenclature chimique. Observations sur la Physique, 19, 370–382.
Guyton de Morveau, L.-B. (1786). Encyclopédie méthodique: Chymie, pharmacie et métallurgie, t.1. Paris: Panckoucke.
Hannaway, O. (1975). The chemists & the word: The didactic origins of chemistry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kim, M. G. (2003). Affinity, that elusive dream: A genealogy of chemical revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Klein, U., & Lefèvre, W. (2007). Materials in eighteenth-century science: A historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1961). The function of measurement in modern Physical Science. Isis, 52, 161–193.
Lavoisier, A. ([1789] 1937). Traité élémentaire de chimie. Paris: Guther-Villar Éditeur.
Llana, J. W. (1985). A contribution of natural history to the chemical revolution in France. Ambix, 32, 71–91.
Luna, F. (2013). Vicente de Seabra Telles e a criação da nomenclatura em português para a química “nova” de Lavoisier. Química Nova, 36, 921–926.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
Miller, P. (2005). Description terminable and interminable: Looking at the past, nature and peoples in Peiresc’s archive. In G. Pomata & N. G. Siraisi (Eds.), Historia, empiricism and erudition in early modern Europe (pp. 355–397). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Niaz, M. (2001). How important are the laws of definite and multiple proportions in chemistry and teaching chemistry? A history and philosophy of science perspective. Science & Education, 10, 243–266.
Paixão, F., & Cachapuz, A. (2003). Mudança na prática de ensino da química pela formação dos professores em história e filosofia das ciências. Química Nova na Escola, 18, 31–36.
Pépin, F. (2012). La philosophie expérimentale de Diderot et la chimie: Philosophie, sciences et arts. Paris: Garnier.
Peterschmitt, L. (2005). Bacon et la chimie: a propôs de la réception de la philosophie naturelle de Francis Bacon aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Methodos, 5, 1–22. https://methodos.revues.org/385. Accessed 20 July 2016.
Powers, J. C. (2012). Inventing chemistry: Herman Boerhaave and the reform of the chemical arts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Principe, L. (Ed.). (2007). New narratives in eighteenth-century chemistry. Contributions from the First Francis Bacon Workshop, 21–23 April 2005, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California. Dordrecht: Springer.
Simon, J. (1999). L’Homme de verre? Les trois regnes et la promiscuité de la nature. Corpus, 36, 65–80.
Sukopp, T. (2013). Robert Boyle, Baconian science and the rise of chemistry in the seventeenth century. Society and Politics, 7, 54–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zaterka, L., Mocellin, R.C. (2018). Natural History, Chemistry, and Teaching in Modern Scientific Culture. In: Prestes, M., Silva, C. (eds) Teaching Science with Context. Science: Philosophy, History and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74036-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74036-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74035-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74036-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)