Skip to main content

Common Sense, Philosophy, and Mental Disturbance: A Wittgensteinian Outlook

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Schizophrenia and Common Sense

Part of the book series: Studies in Brain and Mind ((SIBM,volume 12))

Abstract

Wittgenstein likens philosophy to both an illness and a therapy. What seems an ambiguity is actually a complex dialectical relationship, in which common sense plays a crucial role. My aim is to research common sense in order to clarify this relationship. I will do so by comparing Wittgenstein’s reflections on these issues with what in psychopathology has been named “the loss of natural self-evidence”, or “the loss of common sense”. Section 14.1 sets the scene, introduces the theme of common sense, and focuses on radical doubt as a philosophical disease. Section 14.2 describes in more detail Wittgenstein’s notion of “hinges”: these are common sense and practical certainties, doubt about which, in ordinary circumstances, is unreasonable. Building on prior literature in the psychopathology and philosophy of psychiatry, I argue that doubts about hinges can indeed characterize the early stages of schizophrenia. After developing the comparison between schizophrenia and philosophy as illness, Sect. 14.3 deals with the therapeutic side of philosophy: I argue that Wittgenstein’s point is to call for a “de-epistemicization” of life and the rediscovery and strengthening of practical trust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For abbreviations of Wittgenstein’s works, see the References.

  2. 2.

    Wittgenstein uses both “Gewissheit” and “Sicherheit” in OC, with a slight predominance of “Sicherheit”, a term more akin to the English “sureness” or “safety” than to “certainty”.

  3. 3.

    See Marie McGinn (1989: 102–103) for a useful list of Moore-type propositions. For a classification of Wittgenstein’s hinge certainties, see Moyal-Sharrock (2005). Recent works on the relevance of this Wittgensteinian notion for epistemology include Coliva (2015), Coliva and Moyal-Sharrock (2016) and Pritchard (2016).

  4. 4.

    This is what Lalumera (2017, Chap. 15, this volume) calls “negative” account.

  5. 5.

    Sass has actually been criticized by some Wittgensteinians, chiefly from the “New Wittgenstein” school: see Read (2001).

  6. 6.

    Avramides (2013) uses the same approach with respect to autism.

  7. 7.

    This chapter is the final reworking of a paper presented, in different stages of its development, at the UNED University of Madrid, the University of Roma Tre, the New University of Lisbon, and Lancaster University. I am deeply indebted to the organizers of the events and the participants for many suggestions. I particularly thank Nuno Venturinha and Richard Gipps for reading and commenting on the final draft, and an anonymous reviewer for very helpful remarks.

References

  • Avramides, A. (2013). Other minds, autism, and depth in human interaction. In K. W. M. Fulford et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of psychiatry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. (2003). Wittgenstein’s method and psychoanalysis. In K. W. M. Fulford et al. (Eds.), Nature and narrative. An introduction to the new philosophy of psychiatry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bax, C. (2013). Reading On Certainty through the Lens of Cavell. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 21(4), 515–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenburg, W. (2012). Der Verlust der natürliche Selbstverständlichkeit. Berlin, Germany: Parodos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenburg, W., & Mishara, A. L. (2001). First steps toward a psychopathology of “common sense”. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 8(4), 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boncompagni, A. (2016). Wittgenstein and pragmatism. On certainty in the light of Peirce and James. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boncompagni, A. (forthcoming). Wittgenstein on meaning, use, and linguistic commitment. In D. G. Stern (Ed.), Wittgenstein in the 1930s: Between the Tractatus and the investigations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortolotti, L. (2011). Continuing commentary: Shaking the bedrock. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 18(1), 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (2001). Rationality, meaning, and the analysis of delusion. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 8(2/3), 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1979). The claim of reason. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coliva, A. (2010). Moore and Wittgenstein. Scepticism, certainty, and common sense. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coliva, A. (2015). Extended rationality: A hinge epistemology. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coliva, A. and Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2016). Eds. Hinge Epistemology. Double Special Issue. International Journal for the Study of Scepticism, 6(2–3).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Martino, E. (2002). La fine del mondo (2nd ed.). Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury, M. (1996). The danger of words and writings on Wittgenstein. Bristol, UK: Thoemmes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilan, N. (2001). Meaning, truth, and the self: Commentary on Campbell and Parnas and sass. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 8(2/3), 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, E. (2017). Wittgenstein and psychoanalysis. In H.-J. Glock & J. Hyman (Eds.), A companion to Wittgenstein. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalumera, E. (2017) Understanding Schizophrenia Through Wittgenstein: Empathy, Explanation, and Philosophical Clarification. In I. Hipólito, J. Gonçalves, J. G. Pereira (Eds.), Schizophrenia and common sense: Explaining madness and social values. Springer Mind Brain Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavi, L. (forthcoming). Listening to Unreason: Foucault and Wittgenstein on Reason and the Unreasonable Man.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, M. (1989). Sense and certainty. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, R. (1991). Ludwig Wittgenstein. The duty of genius. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1959). Philosophical papers. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2005). Understanding Wittgenstein’s on certainty. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D. (2016). Epistemic angst. Radical Skepticism and the groundlessness of our believing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, R. (2001). On approaching schizophrenia through Wittgenstein. Philosophical Psychology, 14(4), 449–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhees, R. (Ed.). (1984). Recollections of Wittgenstein. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, J., & Gipps, R. G. T. (2008). Delusions, certainty, and the background. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 15(4), 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saas, L. A. (1994). The paradoxes of delusion. Wittgenstein, Schreber, and the schizophrenic mind. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanghellini, G. (2004). Disembodied spirits and Deanimated bodies. The psychopathology of common sense. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanghellini, G. (2008). Schizophrenic delusions, embodiment, and the background. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 15(4), 311–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, T. (2008). Why the idea of framework propositions cannot contribute to an understanding of delusions. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiercelin, C. (2016). In Defense of a critical Commonsensist conception of knowledge. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, 6(2–3), 182–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1975). On certainty (G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright Eds., 2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell [OC].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1978). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics (G. H. von Wright, R. Rhees, & G. E. M. Anscombe, Eds.). Oxford, UK:Blackwell [RFM].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology (G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright. Eds.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell[RPP].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1981). Zettel (G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright Eds.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Z].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1982). Wittgenstein’s lctures: Cambridge, 1932–1935 (A. Ambrose Ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell [AWL].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1998). Culture and value (G. H. von Wright Ed., 2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell [CV].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations (P. M. S. Hacker & J. Schulte Eds., 4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell [PI].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boncompagni, A. (2018). Common Sense, Philosophy, and Mental Disturbance: A Wittgensteinian Outlook. In: Hipólito, I., Gonçalves, J., Pereira, J. (eds) Schizophrenia and Common Sense. Studies in Brain and Mind, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73993-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics