Skip to main content

Trust and Crises in the EU: Exit, Voice and Loyalty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trust in the European Union in Challenging Times

Abstract

von Sydow depicts a European Union in crisis wherein trust among the member states, and between them and the Union, is under heavy strain. Devoid of full-scale democracy, the EU acquires legitimacy from the member states’ loyalty to the joint project. In the euro crisis, Brexit and the conflict between EU member states over migration such loyalty falls short. As European integration moves towards politically sensitive areas, new legitimacy demands are placed upon the Union. As a result, national resistance is growing in many parts of Europe and the rise of Eurosceptic parties undermines trust in the system. The author concludes that the faltering trust in the Union requires either a move towards a federal system or a return to an intergovernmental form of legitimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartolini, S. (2005). Restructuring Europe: Centre formation, system building and political structuring between the nation-state and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, C. J. (2012). European integration: From nation-states to member states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dagens Nyheter. (2016). De nordiska länderna ökar trycket på Ungern, 2016-09-10. Retrieved from https://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/de-nordiska-landerna-okartrycket-pa-ungern/

  • De Wilde, P., & Zürn, M. (2012). Can the politicization of European integration be reversed? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(1), 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, P., Kuhnle, S., & Urwin, D. W. (Eds.). (1999). State formation, nation building and mass politics in Europe: The theory of Stein Rokkan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2016). More integration, less federation: The European integration of core state powers. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(1), 42–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, S. (2009). Putting limits on accountability avoidance. In S. Gustavsson, C. Karlsson, & P. Persson (Eds.), The illusion of accountability in the European Union. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, S. (2014). The need for legitimate opposition and protectionism. In O. Cramne & S. B. Hobolt (Eds.), Democratic politics in a European Union under stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E. B. ([1958] 2004). The uniting of Europe: Political, social and economic forces 1950–1957. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (2006). Why the EU needs (left-right) politics? Policy reform and accountability are impossible without it, in, politics: The right or the wrong sort of medicine for the EU? Paris: Notre Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juncker, J. C. (2016). Speech on the State of the Union, Strasbourg, 14 September 2016. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/state-union-2016_en

  • Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S., et al. (2012). Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L. N., & Scheingold, S. A. (1970). Europe’s would-be polity: Patterns of change in the European community. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2007). Political opposition and the European Union. Government and Opposition, 42(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2011). Bini Smaghi vs. the parties: Representative government and institutional constraints. European Union Democracy Observatory, no. 22. Florence: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing of western democracy. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mény, Y. (2014). Managing the EU crises: Another way of integration by stealth? West European Politics, 37(6), 1336–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. W. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. (1970). Citizens, elections, parties: Approaches to the comparative study of the processes of development. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (2005). Social traps and the problem of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (2015). No exit from the euro-rescuing trap? In V. Schneider & B. Eberlein (Eds.), Complex democracy: Varieties, crises, and transformations. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2015). The Eurozone’s crisis of democratic legitimacy: Can the EU rebuild public trust and support for European economic integration? European Commission Discussion Paper, no. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1992). Capital, coercion, and European states. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Eijk, C., & Franklin, M. (2004). Dimensions of contestation in European elections. In G. Marks & M. R. Steenbergen (Eds.), European Union and political conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Sydow, G. (2013). Politicizing Europe: Patterns of party-based opposition to European integration. Stockholm: Department of Political Science, Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Sydow, G. (2014). Parties and politics of opposition in the European Union. Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, 23(1), 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. (2015). Emergency Europe. Political Studies, 63(2), 300–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

von Sydow, G. (2019). Trust and Crises in the EU: Exit, Voice and Loyalty. In: Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, A., Bremberg, N., Michalski, A., Oxelheim, L. (eds) Trust in the European Union in Challenging Times. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73857-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics