Abstract
This chapter analyzes the way nineteenth-century novels characterize women physicians who inhabit what the author calls a queer literary space. Nineteenth-century American women physicians represent a queer, transgressive, and liminal space between the physical and ideological female-inhabited domestic space and the male-dominated professional space. The author analyzes novels by Elizabeth Stuart Phelps, Sarah Orne Jewett, and Annie Nathan Meyers, arguing that they struggle to contain their women physician characters generically just as dominant gender categories struggled to contain women physicians’ transgression. Novels of realism create liminal spaces that the women physician characters must sacrifice to escape. The characters are liminal generically as they often become either sentimentally sacrificial or unrealistically not quite human. Thus the novels of realism manage to depict generically the very struggle they represent thematically.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
According to the Oxford Companion to English Literature, “Social Problem Novel” is “a phrase used (alongside terms such as ‘the industrial novel’, or the ‘condition of England’ novel) to describe mid-nineteenth-century fiction which examines abuses and hardships affecting the working classes. These included many of the topics which were simultaneously being exposed by non-fictional writers, such as poor housing and sanitation; conditions in factories; child labour; the exploitation of seamstresses; and the exhausting nature of agricultural work. Largely written from a middleclass perspective, it sometimes sought to stimulate legislation, or (as in Elizabeth Gaskell’s North and South, 1854–5) to promote understanding between masters and men on the basis of shared humanity, and shared material interests, as a way forward.”
- 2.
The term “third sex” is often associated with either biological intersexuality or notions of queer genders found throughout queer theory. Examples of the biological analysis can be found in such works as Michael G. Peletz’s anthropological analyses or Morgan Holmes’s scholarly analysis of the simplicity of considering biological third sexes as an “other” of binary sex. For the most comprehensive analysis of how queer theory has used the concept, see Eve Kosofsky Sedgewick’s Epistomology of the Closet (University of California Press, 1990).
- 3.
Jean Carwile Masteller claims “a close examination of the conclusion reveals that it is not nearly so triumphant a victory for women in a new role as the rest of the novel appears to foreshadow” (139). While Morris claims that the ending justifies her character’s religious, moral virtues and that this is Phelps’s goal with the final chapter, there seems to be little textual evidence for this. In no way does Phelps ever seem to claim that marriage is a woman’s only way to enact virtue. Her ending, then, offers no clear victory for Doctor Zay; Phelps has her heroine stripped of her agency by a man.
- 4.
See Karen Weingarten’s Abortion in the American Imagination (Rutgers University Press, 2014) and Janet Farrell Brodie’s Contraception and Abortion in 19th-Century America (Cornell University Press, 1994) for comprehensive lists of douching procedures and abortifacients.
Works Cited
Campbell, James. “Editor’s Notes.” Journal of the Gynaecological Society of Boston, vol. 2, 1870, pp. 117–118.
Clevenger, Martha R. “From Lay Practitioner to Doctor of Medicine: Women Physicians in St. Louis, 1860–1920.” Gateway Heritage, vol. 8, no. 3, 1987, pp. 1–32.
Dall, Caroline. “Women as Physicians.” New England Medical Gazette, March, 1868.
Fisher, C. E. “A Rare Hysterectomy.” Medical Century: The National Journal of Homœopathic Medicine, Surgery, and Collateral Sciences, March, 1894, pp. 121–123.
Fulton, Valerie. “Rewriting the Necessary Woman: Marriage and Professionalism in James, Jewett, and Phelps.” The Henry James Review, vol. 15, no. 1, 1994, pp. 242–256.
Garrison, William Lloyd. “Fair Play for Woman in the Medical Profession.” The Independent, Dec. 23, 1869.
Habegger, Alfred. Henry James and the “Woman Business”. Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Howells, William Dean. Doctor Breen’s Practice. James R. Osgood, 1881.
James, Henry. The Bostonians. 1886. Penguin Classics, 2000.
Jewett, Sarah Orne. A Country Doctor. Bantam Books, 1999.
Kidderminster Medical Society. “Society Reports.” Birmingham Medical Review, vol. 4, 1897.
Kilcup, Karen L. “Challenge and Compliance: Textual Strategies in A Country Doctor and Nineteenth-Century American Women’s Medical Autobiographies.” Jewett and her Contemporaries: Reshaping the Canon, edited by Judith Bryant Wittenberg. University Press of Florida, 1999, pp. 124–133.
Masteller, Jean Carwile. “The Women Doctors of Howells, Phelps, and Jewett: The Conflict of Marriage and Career.” Critical Essays on Sarah Orne Jewett, edited by Gwen L. Nages. G. D. Hall and Co., 1984, pp. 135–147.
Meyer, Annie Nathan. Helen Brent, M. D.: A Social Study. Cassell Publishing Company, 1892.
Morantz-Sanchez, Regina. Conduct Unbecoming a Woman: Medicine on Trial in Turn of the Century Brooklyn. Oxford University Press, 1999.
Morris, Timothy. “Professional Ethics and Professional Erotics in Elizabeth Stuart Phelps’ ‘Doctor Zay’.” Studies in American Fiction, vol. 21, no. 2, 1993, pp. 141–153.
Phelps, Elizabeth Stuart. Doctor Zay. CUNY Feminist Press, 1987.
“Social Problem Novel.” The Oxford Companion to English Literature, edited by Dinah Birch. Oxford University Press, 2009.
Soja, Edward W. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Blackwell Publishing, 1996.
Stansell, Christine. “Elizabeth Stuart Phelps: A Study in Female Rebellion.” Massachusetts Review, vol. 13, 1972, pp. 239–256.
Ward, Susan. “The Career Woman Fiction of Elizabeth Stuart Phelps.” Nineteenth-Century Women Writers of the English-Speaking World, edited by Rhoda B. Nathan. Greenwood, 1986, pp. 210–219.
Wegener, Frederick. ““A Line of Her Own”: Henry James’s “Sturdy Little Doctress” and the Medical Woman as Literary Type in Gilded-Age America.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 39, no. 2, 1997, pp. 139–180.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jessee, M.J. (2018). “The Third Sex”: Nineteenth-Century Women Physicians in Queer, Liminal Literary Spaces. In: Jacobson, K., Allukian, K., Legleitner, RA., Allison, L. (eds) Liminality, Hybridity, and American Women's Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73851-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73851-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73850-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73851-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)