Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk Perception and Antecedents of Safe Behaviour in Workers at a Garment Factory in Mexico

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Preventing Health and Environmental Risks in Latin America

Part of the book series: The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science ((APESS,volume 23))

  • 405 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is based on field research. The job hazards in a garment factory were identified, and then the risk perception of members of the production area was assessed. To do that, we developed and validated the Textile Industry Risk Perception Scale , which is composed of two factors: (a) Perceived risk of accident and (b) Perceived risk of ergonomic hazards. The differences and similarities between these factors and their relation to productivity, occupational grouping and gender were analysed. We found some significant differences: Operators perceived greater risk than supervisors and indirect personnel. In addition, the greater their productivity, the less likely it is that operators will perceive that they are at risk of accidents at work. We discuss the importance of identifying job hazards for personnel training systems, and the development of a culture of safety in workplaces.

Dr. Lorena R. Pérez Floriano, Researcher-Professor, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte. Email: lperezfloriano@gmail.com.

Julieta Amada Leyva Pacheco, M.Sc., Teacher, Universidad Estatal de Sonora-Hermosillo. Email: jleyvap@yahoo.com.mx.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The data for this study stem from the Master’s thesis of the second author.

References

  • Arezes, P.M., & Miguel, A.S. (2008). Risk perception and safety behavior: a study in an occupational environment. Safety Science, 46, 900–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asfahl, C.R. (2000). Seguridad industrial y salud, 4a ed., México: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, N.T., Chapman, G.B., Gibbons, F.X., Gerrard, M., McCaul K.D., Weinstein, N.D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 136–145 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136.

  • Burke, M.J., Salvador, R.O., Smith-Crowe, K., Chan-Serafin, S., Smith, A., & Sonesh, S. (2011). The dread factor: how hazards and safety training influence learning and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 46–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell, A., & Torres, A. (2010). Evaluación de percepción de riesgo ocupacional. Ingeniería Mecánica, 13(3), 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T., & Rial-Gonzalez, E. (2000). Risk management, psychosocial hazards and work stress. J. Rantanen & S. Lehtinen (Eds.), Psychological Stress at Work, Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, X., & Schlaen, N. (1994). La salud ignorada: trabajadoras de la confección. Santiago: Ediciones Centro de Estudios de la Mujer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucane, M.L., Slovic, P., Mertz, C.K., Flynn, J., & Satterfield, T.A. (2000). Gender, race, and perceived risk: The ‘white male’ effect. Health, Risk & Society, 2(2), 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.W., Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., Nair, I., Lave, L.B. (1991). What risks are people concerned about? Risk Analysis, 11(2), 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, O.X. (2006). ‘La seguridad industrial para la mediana empresa textil en el área de la confección’, (tesis de maestría) México, IPN, Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Ingeniería y Ciencias Sociales y Administrativas, sin pie de imprenta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadarrama, O.R., Hualde, A.A., López, E.S. (2012). Precariedad laboral y heterogeneidad ocupacional: una propuesta teórico-metodológica. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 74(2), 213–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollmann, S., Heuer, H., Schmidt, K.H. (2001). Control at work: a generalized resource factor for the prevention of musculoskeletal symptoms? Work & Stress 15, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization (ILO) (2015). Safety and health at work. http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/safety-and-health-at-work/lang--en/index.htm.

  • Ley Federal del Trabajo (2012). Diario Oficial de la Federación. México y H. Congreso de la Unión.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyos, C.G. (1995). Occupational safety: Progress in understanding the basic aspects of safe and unsafe behaviour. Applied Psychology, 44(3), 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouabenan, D.R. (2009). Role of beliefs in accident and risk analysis and prevention. Safety Science, 47, 767–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompier, M. (2006). Work-related stress and health-risks, mechanism and countermeasures. Scandinavan Journal of Work Environment and Health, 32(6) 413–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezama, C. (2004). Percepción del riesgo y comportamiento ambiental en la industria. México: El Colegio de Jalisco/Consejo Estatal de Ciencia y Tecnología de Jalisco/ Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, N.M. (2004). Desarrollo de un plan de seguridad ocupacional para la industria de la confección. (Tesis de maestría), México: Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, sin pie de imprenta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo Junior, A.S. (2012). The risk of developing repetitive stress injury in seamstresses, in the clothing industry, under the perspective of ergonomic work analysis: a case study. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 41, 1670–1676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, P.C., & Crum, M.R. (1998). The effects of perceived and objective safety risk on employee outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53, 300–313 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1997.1620.

  • Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H., (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parada, A., & Pelupessy, W. (2006). Los efectos ambientales de la cadena global de prendas de vestir en Costa Rica. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, 3, 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Floriano, L., & Gonzalez, J.A. (2007). Risk, safety and culture in Brazil and Argentina: The case of Transinc Corporation. International Journal of Manpower 28, 403–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintero, R.C., & Romo, A.M.L. (2001). Riesgos laborales en la maquiladora: La industria Tamaulipeca. Frontera Norte, 13 (2), 11–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold, K., & Tint, P. (2009). Hazard profile in manufacturing: determination of risk levels towards enhancing the workplace safety. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 17(2), 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundmo, T. (1996). Associations between risk perception and safety. Safety Science, 24, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salminen, S., Saari, J., Saarela, K.L., Rasanen, T. (1993). Organizational factors influencing serious occupational accidents. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 19: 257–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E.H. (1996). Three cultures of management: The key to organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheu, J.J., Hwang, J.S., Wang, J.D. (2000). Diagnosis and momentary quantification of occupational injuries by indices related to human capital loss: analysis of a steel company as an illustration. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 32, 435–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (2003). The different dynamics of personal and general risk. Risk Management, 5(3), 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of Risk. Science, 236, 280–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: survey the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19(4), 689–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S. (1982). Why study risk perception? Risk Analysis, 2(2), 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tejeda, N., & Pérez-Floriano, L. (2011). La amplificación social del riesgo: evidencias del accidente en la mina Pasta de Conchos. Comunicación y Sociedad, 15, 71–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E., Blais, A.R., & Betz, N. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 263–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2004). Climate as a social-cognitive construction of supervisory safety practices: scripts as proxy of behavior patterns. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 322.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, Tijuana, Mexico

    Lorena R. Pérez Floriano

  2. Universidad Estatal de Sonora-Hermosillo, Hermosillo, Mexico

    Julieta Amada Leyva Pacheco

Authors
  1. Lorena R. Pérez Floriano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julieta Amada Leyva Pacheco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorena R. Pérez Floriano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Psychological Research, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico

    Ma. Luisa Marván

  2. Interdisciplinary Psychology Research Center, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico

    Esperanza López-Vázquez

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pérez Floriano, L.R., Pacheco, J.A.L. (2018). Risk Perception and Antecedents of Safe Behaviour in Workers at a Garment Factory in Mexico. In: Marván, M., López-Vázquez, E. (eds) Preventing Health and Environmental Risks in Latin America. The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73799-7_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation