Skip to main content

Abstract

Statutory auditors play an important role in verifying and authenticating the financial statements of a corporate enterprise in order to protect stakeholder interests. Statutory auditors’ work is perceived to be reliable if they are independent of the management of the corporate enterprise. However, in cases of corporate failure, the ensuing investigations unearthed possible lack of independence in statutory auditors that could have been one of the causes behind disastrous consequences faced by stakeholders. In this context, this chapter identifies the specific focus of the present study and points out a few questions that need answering. Existing literature in the area is reviewed and gaps are identified that help formulate the objectives of the present study. In order to meet those objectives, a comprehensive methodology and detailed chapter plan are set out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sinha, G. (2009). Financial Statement Analysis. Kolkata: PHI Learning Private Limited. pp. 1–5.

  2. 2.

    Duska, R., Duska, B., & Ragatz, J. (2011). Accounting Ethics. London: Wiley–Blackwell. pp. 118–122.

  3. 3.

    Gupta, K. (2005). Contemporary Auditing. New Delhi: Tata McGraw–Hill. pp. 7–13.

  4. 4.

    Audit and Assurance Standards Board (2010). Standard on Auditing 200: Overall Objective of an Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Standards of Auditing. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

  5. 5.

    Gupta, K. (2005). Contemporary Auditing. New Delhi: Tata McGraw–Hill. pp. 7–13.

  6. 6.

    Bakshi, S. (2000). Professional Ethics – Back to Basics. Management Accountant, 35(7), 499–501.

  7. 7.

    Copeland, J. (2005). Ethics as an Imperative. Accounting Horizons, 19(1), 35–43.

  8. 8.

    Brewster, N. (2003). Unaccountable: How the Accounting Profession forfeited Public Trust. New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 8–10.

  9. 9.

    Jones, M. (2011). The Creative Accounting and Fraud Environment. In M. Jones (Ed.), Creative Accounting, Fraud and International Accounting Scandals (pp. 21–30). New York: Wiley Publication.

  10. 10.

    Kothari, C. (2010). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers. pp. 84–87.

Bibliography

Books and Book Sections

  • Banerjee, B. (2011). Corporate Creative Accounting in India: Extent and Consequences. In M. Jones (Ed.), Creative Accounting, Fraud and International Accounting Scandals (pp. 233–252). New York: Wiley Publication

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, N. (2003). Unaccountable: How the Accounting Profession Forfeited Public Trust. New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Clickeman, P. (2009). Called to Account: Fourteen Financial Frauds that Shaped American Accounting Profession. London and New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Duska, R., Duska, B., & Ragatz, J. (2011). Accounting Ethics. London: Wiley-Blackwell

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gowthrope, C., & Blake, J. (1998). Ethical Issues in Accounting. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2011b). Creative Accounting, Fraud and International Accounting Scandals. New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, K., & Walters, D. (2009). Accounting and Business Ethics. London and New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibodeau, J., & Freier, D. (2010). Auditing and Accounting Cases: Investigating Issues of Fraud and Professional Ethics. New York: McGrawHill/Irwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. (2011). Financial Statements Fraud Casebook: Baking the Ledgers and Cooking the Book. Wiley Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakshi, S. (2000). Professional Ethics – Back to Basics. Management Accountant, 35(7), 499–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M., & Lowenstein, G. (2002). Why Good Accountants Do Bad Audits. Harvard Business Review, 80(11), 96–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, S. (2009). Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) in India. Management Accountant, 44(3), 194–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Carcello, J., & Nagy, A. (2004). Audit Firm Tenure and Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2), 55–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Casterella, J., Jensen, K., & Knechel, W. (2009). Is Self-Regulated Peer Review Effective at Signalling Audit Quality. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 713–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, A. (1996). Ethics in the Era of Scam. Management Accountant, 31(11), 806–812

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, M., & Gupta, S. (2007). Ethical Audit: Stakeholders Perspective. Chartered Accountant, 56(5), 751–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., Kim, C., Kim, J., & Zang, Y. (2010). Audit Office Size, Audit Quality and Audit Pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 29(1), 73–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, J. (2005). Ethics as an Imperative. Accounting Horizons, 19(1), 35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, C., & Kelly, P. (2004). A Note on Ethics Educational Interventions in an Undergraduate Auditing Course: Is There an Enron Effect? Issues in Accounting Education, 19(1), 53–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freier, D. (2004). Compromised Work in the Public Accounting Profession: The Issue of Independence. Good Work Project Report Series (35). Harvard University, 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerotra, S., & Baijal, M. (2002). Prominent Peer Review Practice Around the Globe – Ensuring Quality Audit. Chartered Accountant, 51(1), 76–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffari, F., Kyriacou, O., & Brennan, R. (2008). Exploring the Implementation of Ethics in UK Accounting Programs. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(2), 183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S. (1999). Independence of Statutory Auditors of Companies – A Myth or Reality. Research Bulletin, 18, 76–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, G. (2008). What Went Wrong? Accounting Frauds and Lessons from Recent Scandals. Social Research, 75(4), 1205–1238

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, N., McEnroe, J., & Stevens, K. (2005). Auditor’s Reactions to Sarbanes Oxley and PCAOB. The CPA Journal, 75(Innovations Supplement), 33–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Koumbiadis, N., & Okpara, J. (2008). Ethics and Accounting Profession: An Exploratory Study of Accounting Students in Post Secondary Institutions. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(5), 147–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, C. (1999b). Non-audit Fees, Disclosure and Audit Quality. The European Accounting Review, 8(2), 239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J., & Hwang, M. (2010). Audit Quality, Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: A Meta Analysis. International Journal of Accounting, 14, 57–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, S. (2000). Fight Against Corruption by Accountants. Management Accountant, 35(7), 487–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Narielvala, P. (1998, July). Code of Conduct for a Profession: A Torch to the Succeeding Generation. Chartered Accountant, 47(1), 153–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (2008). Forensic Accounting: A New Paradigm for Cranny Consulting. Research Bulletin, 32, 98–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, P. (2000). Do the Right Thing. Chartered Accountant, 49(5), 8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittal, N. (2000). Ethics and Code of Conduct. Chartered Accountant, 49(5), 19

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roy, M.N., Saha, S.S. (2018). Introduction. In: Statutory Auditors’ Independence in Protecting Stakeholders’ Interest. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73727-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73727-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73726-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73727-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics