Skip to main content

Brokering: Africa’s Unique Brand of Entrepreneurship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
African Entrepreneurship

Abstract

The concept of brokering has attracted intense scholarly and practitioner attention resulting in the proliferation of diverse forms of brokering. We examine the current state of literature in an attempt to identify possible link between brokering and entrepreneurship towards establishing brokering as a new form of entrepreneurship. After an evaluation of brokering and the entrepreneurship literature, there was a revelation of muted reception by scholars attempting to leverage on relational ties/or informal connections to bridge structural holes which could lead to revenue generation. The purpose of this chapter is to contribute significantly to existing literature in entrepreneurship by introducing yet another concept in entrepreneurship dubbed “brokering entrepreneurship” which is premised on informal connections to bridge structural holes. This concept is in its embryonic state; therefore, we recommend scholars to embrace the concept and advance future research in other jurisdictions since contexts play significant roles towards understanding the concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albulescu, C. T., Tămăşilă, M., & Tăucean, I. M. (2016). Entrepreneurship, tax evasion and corruption in Europe. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 246–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. R., Drakopoulou Dodd, S., & Jack, S. L. (2012). Entrepreneurship as connecting: Some implications for theorising and practice. Management Decision, 50(5), 958–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T., & Welter, F. (2017). Come on out of the ghetto, please!—Building the future of entrepreneurship research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(2), 170–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. M. (2012). Entrepreneurship and government in US high-tech policy. In Innovation policy and governance in high-tech industries (pp. 103–125). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On social network theory. Organisational Science, 22(5), 1168–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2015). Reinforced structural holes. Social Networks, 43, 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S., Hogarth, R. M., & Michaud, C. (2000). The social capital of French and American managers. Organization Science, 11(2), 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S., Kilduff, M., & Tasselli, S. (2013). Social network analysis: Foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 527–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnovale, S., Rogers, D. S., & Yeniyurt, S. (2016). Bridging structural holes in global manufacturing equity based partnerships: A network analysis of domestic vs. international joint venture formations. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(1), 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelekis, J., & Mudambi, S. M. (2010). MNCs and micro-entrepreneurship in emerging economies: The case of Avon in the Amazon. Journal of International Management, 16(4), 412–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiles, T. H., Bluedorn, A. C., & Gupta, V. K. (2007). Beyond creative destruction and entrepreneurial discovery: A radical Austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28(4), 467–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. B., & Gordon, R. H. (2007). Taxes and entrepreneurial risk-taking: Theory and evidence for the US. Journal of Public Economics, 91(7), 1479–1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Foundation and Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1998). The new institutionalisms: Avenues of collaboration. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 154(4), 696–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diochon, M., & Anderson, A. R. (2011). Ambivalence and ambiguity in social enterprise; Narratives about values in reconciling purpose and practices. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eksner, H. J., & Orellana, M. F. (2012). Shifting in the zone: Latina/o child language brokers and the co-construction of knowledge. Ethos, 40(2), 196–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, S. S. (2000). Literacy brokering: An expanded scope of practice for SLPs. Topics in Language Disorders, 21(1), 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, D. (2004). Creating space for play/invention—Concepts of space and organizational entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(5), 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kam, J. A., Marcoulides, K. M., & Merolla, A. J. (2017). Using an acculturation-stress-resilience framework to explore Latent profiles of Latina/o language brokers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(4), 842–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1973/1993). Competition and entrepreneurship (7th impr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1996). The meaning of market process: Essays in the development of modern Austrian economics. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaggård, Å. (2015). The multiple streams framework and the problem broker. European Journal of Political Research, 54(3), 450–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, J. (2007). The in-between world of knowledge brokering. Bmj, 334(7585), 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, J. A., & Buriel, R. (2007). Language brokering, autonomy, parent-child bonding, biculturalism, and depression: A study of Mexican American adolescents from immigrant families. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 29(4), 472–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, R., Caner, T., Prescott, J., & Koka, B. (2008). Bringing the firm back in: Networking as antecedent to network structure. In Network strategy (pp. 457–501). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 58, 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najafizada, S. A. M., & Cohen, M. J. (2017). Social entrepreneurship tackling poverty in Bamyan Province, Afghanistan. World Development Perspectives, 5, 24–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orellana, M. F., & Reynolds, J. F. (2008). Cultural modeling: Leveraging bilingual skills for school paraphrasing tasks. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(1), 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, K. H. (2009). Genres, contexts, and literacy practices: Literacy brokering among Sudanese refugee families. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 256–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). The diffusion of innovation (5th ed.). New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roininen, S., & Ylinenpää, H. (2009). Schumpeterian versus Kirznerian entrepreneurship: A comparison of academic and non-academic new venturing. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16(3), 504–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sgourev, S. V. (2015). Brokerage as catalysis: How Diaghilev’s ballets russes escalated modernism. Organization Studies, 36(3), 343–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soda, G., Usai, A., & Zaheer, A. (2004). Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 893–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, E. S., Acton, R. M., & Butts, C. T. (2013). Extended structures of mediation: Re-examining brokerage in dynamic networks. Social Networks, 35(1), 130–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stea, D., Soda, G., & Pedersen, T. (2016). Network structure, collaborative context, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317724509.

  • Stovel, K., & Shaw, L. (2012). Brokerage. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasudeva, G., Zaheer, A., & Hernandez, E. (2013). The embeddedness of networks: Institutions, structural holes, and innovativeness in the fuel cell industry. Organization Science, 24(3), 645–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, V., House, A., & Hamer, S. (2009). Knowledge brokering: The missing link in the evidence to action chain? Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 5(3), 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. (2007). When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, J. G., & Venkataraman, S. (2010). The entrepreneur–environment nexus: Uncertainty, innovation, and allocation. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 449–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Quaye, D.M., Nkukpornu, A., Acheampong, G. (2018). Brokering: Africa’s Unique Brand of Entrepreneurship. In: Dana, LP., Ratten, V., Honyenuga, B. (eds) African Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Studies of Entrepreneurship in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73700-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics