Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Mathematics Education in the Digital Era ((MEDE,volume 11))

Abstract

Calculation algorithms are fated to be supplanted, and the art of using them replaced by different sets of skills, and eventually: machines. Yet, using and creating algorithms is still mathematically relevant and in fact contributes to the evolution of mathematics itself. In school and everyday life, however, calculating is often seen as a mindless, boring activity. Algorithms are indeed designed to require as less thinking as possible. I suggest that taking a playful attitude towards algorithms in school is essential so that they can be appreciated in full. Playing with algorithms allow them to really become objects of interest, and be offered as one particular way of experiencing mathematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    He actually dedicated 20 years of his life computing a total of 707 digits without noticing the mistake he made in the 528th digit.

  2. 2.

    Another powerful example concerns the inferiority of the prime counting function versus the logarithmic integral. A large number of confirming observations were made before the first counterexamples were identified, hence the interest in continuing calculations.

References

  • Abdeljaouad, M. 2005. Les arithmétiques arabes: 9e-15e siècles. Tunis: Ibn Zeidoun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdeljaouad, M., and J. Oaks. 2012. De la découverte d’al-Lubâb fî sharh ‘a’mâl al-hisâb d’al-Hawârî al-Misrâtî. Actes du 11e Colloque Maghrébin sur l’Histoire des mathématiques Arabes, Alger-Kooba: École Normale Supérieure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askey, R. 1995. Cube root algorithms. Mathematics in School 24 (2): 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbage, C. 1864/2011. Passages from the Life of a Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballheim, C. 1999. How our readers feel about calculators. In Mathematics education dialogues, ed. Z. Usiskin, 4–5. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A.J., and A. Dowker (eds.). 2003. The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructive adaptive expertise. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borwein, J., and D. Bailey. 2003. Mathematics by experiment: plausible reasoning in the 21st century. Natick, MA: A K Peters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borwein, J., D. Bailey, and R. Girgensohn. 2004. Experimentation in mathematics: computational paths to discovery. Natick, MA: A K Peters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, I. 1984. Symbolic play: The development of social understanding. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butlen, D., and M. Peizard. 2000. Calcul mental et résolution de problèmes numériques au début du collège. Repères IREM 41: 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T.P. 1986. Conceptual knowledge as a foundation for procedural knowledge. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics, 113–132. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerquetti-Aberkane, F., and A. Rodriguez. 2002. Faire des mathématiques avec des images et des manuscrits historiques du cours moyen au collège. Champigny-sur-Marne, France: CRDP de l’académie de Créteil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabert, J.-L. (dir.), E. Barbin, M. Guillemot, A. Michel-Pajus, J. Borowczyk, A. Djebbar, J.-C. Martzloff. 1994. Histoire d’algorithmes: du caillou à la puce. Paris: Belin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaitin, G.J. 2004. Thoughts on the Riemann hypothesis. The Mathematical Intelligencer 26 (1): 4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Châtelet, G. 2000. Figuring space: Philosophy, mathematics, and physics. Dordrecht & Boston: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L. 1994. Enlightenment calculations. Critical Inquiry 21 (1): 182–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. 1996. Teaching mathematics: Toward a sound alternative. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P.J. 1972. Fidelity in mathematical discourse: Is one and one really two? American Mathematical Monthly, 252–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P.J. 2006. Mathematics & common sense: A case of creative tension. Natick, MA: A K Peters/Boca Raton, FL: CRS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Prony, G.R. 1824. Notice sur les grandes tables logarithmiques et trigonometriques: adaptées au nouveau système métrique décimal. Paris: Didot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djebbar, A. 1997. Matériaux pour l’étude des problèmes récréatifs de la tradition mathématique arabe (IXe-XVe siècles). Nantes: Université d’été de Nantes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowek, G. 2007. Les métamorphoses du calcul: une étonnante histoire de mathématiques. Paris: Le Pommier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E.W. 1990. The role of art and play in children’s cognitive development. In Children’s play and learning: Perspectives and policy implications, ed. E. Klugman and S. Smilansky, 43–56. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmer, M. 1998. The mathematics of war. ZDM 30 (3): 74–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. 1994. Mathematics, education, and philosophy: An international perspective. London & Washington, D.C.: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. 2014. Certainty in mathematics: Is there a problem? Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal 28: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. 1987. Non-deductive logic in mathematics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furinghetti, F. 1993. Images of mathematics outside the community of mathematicians: Evidence and explanations. For the Learning of Mathematics 13 (2): 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H.P. 2006. Mathematical play and playful mathematics: A guide for early education. In Play = Learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth, ed. D. Singer et al., 145–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, D.A. 2013. When computers were human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K.M. (ed.). 1981. Children’s understanding of mathematics. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, P. 1980. Math anxiety: Some suggested causes and cures: Part 2. Two-Year College Mathematics Journal 11 (4): 246–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heege, H.T. 1983. The multiplication algorithm: An integrated approach. For the Learning of Mathematics 3 (3): 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, D., A. Ahmed, H. Williams, and C. Hill. 2001. On the importance of mathematical play. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 32 (3): 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huszár, K., and M. Rolínek. 2014. Playful Math—An introduction to mathematical games. Sommer campus am IST Austria. Online at: https://repository.ist.ac.at/312/1/Playful_Math.pdf.

  • Jankvist, U.T. 2007. Empirical research in the field of using history in mathematics education. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education 12 (3): 83–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1934/1781. Critique of Pure Reason. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, V.J. (Ed.). 2000. Using history to teach mathematics: An international perspective. Washington, D.C.: The Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J., J. Swafford, and B. Findell. 2001. The strands of mathematical proficiency. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, and B. Findell. (eds.), Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (pp. 115–155). Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P., and W. Aspray (Eds.). 1988. History and philosophy of modern mathematics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. 1992. Greek mathematical thought and the origin of algebra. New York, NY: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, M. 1982. Mathematics: The loss of certainty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Körner, T.W. 1996. The pleasures of counting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. 1976. Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev [Leontyev], A.N. 1979. The problem of activity in psychology. In The concept of activity in Soviet psychology, ed. J.V. Wertsch, 37–71. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, S. 1990. Alternative perspectives of the nature of mathematics and their influence on the teaching of mathematics. British Educational Research Journal 16 (1): 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madell, R. 1985. Childrens’ natural processes. Arithmetic Teacher 32: 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheux, J.F. 2010. How do we know? An epistemological journey in the day-to-day, moment to-moment, of researching teaching and learning in mathematics education. Doctoral thesis, Victoria, BC: University of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheux, J.F. 2011. Epistemological issues to educational use of technology: The case of calculators in elementary mathematics. In L. Gómez Chova, D. Martí Belenguer, A. López Martínez (Eds.), 3rd International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, July 4th-6th, 2011. EDULEARN11 Proceedings CD. Barcelona, Spain: International Association of Technology, Education and Development, 495–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheux, J.F., and J. Proulx. 2018. Mathematics education (research) liberated from teaching and learning: Towards (the future of) doing mathematics. The Mathematics Enthusiast 15 (1): 78–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, A., B.J. Reys, and R.E. Reys. 1992. A proposed framework for examining basic number sense. For the Learning of Mathematics 12: 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, A. 1932. Teaching and learning algorithms. For the Learning of Mathematics 2 (2): 50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netz, R. 2009. Ludic proof: Greek mathematics and the Alexandrian aesthetic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neyland, J. 2001. An ethical critique of technocratic mathematics education: Towards an ethical philosophy of mathematics education. Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyland, J. 2004. Toward a postmodern ethics of mathematics education. In Mathematics education within the postmodern, ed. M. Walshaw, 55–73. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyland, J. 2010. Rediscovering the spirit of education after scientific management. Rotterdam & Boston & Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormell, C. 1992. New thinking about the nature of mathematics. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University, Centre for Studies in Mathematics, Science and Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitri, E. 2001. The role of artistic play in problem solving. Art Education 54 (3): 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, S. 1979. Decomposition and all that rot. Mathematics in Schools 8 (3): 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, J., and M. Beisiegel. 2009. Mathematical curiosities about division of integers. The Mathematics Enthusiast 6 (3): 411–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabardel, P. 1995. Les hommes et les technologies; approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashed, R. 1997. Histoire des sciences arabes, Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel, B. 1967. The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell: 1872–1914 (volume 1). London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K. 2009. Towards a calculator-aware number curriculum. Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics Education 8 (1): 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, B. 1981. Use of mathematics by adults in daily life. Leicester: Advisory Council for Adult and Continuing Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. 2000. Thinking about mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shechtman, N., and J. Knudsen. 2009. Bringing out the playful side of mathematics: Using methods from improvisational theater in professional development for urban middle school math teachers. Play and Performance: Play and Culture Studies 11: 105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A.G. 1984. The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics 15 (2): 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, I. 1994. Young children’s idiosyncratic written algorithms for addition. Educational Studies in Mathematics 26 (4): 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, K. 2014. Mathematics through play in the early years. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tymoczko, T. 1998. New directions in the philosophy of mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzanakis, C., A. Arcavi, C.C. de Sa, M. Isoda, C.K. Lit, M. Niss, et al. 2002. Integrating history of mathematics in the classroom: An analytic survey. In History in mathematics education: The ICMI Study, eds. J. Fauvel and J. Van Maanen, 201–240. New York etc.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oers, B. 2010. Emergent mathematical thinking in the context of play. Educational Studies in Mathematics 74 (1): 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1966. Igra i ee rol’ v umstvennom razvitii rebenka (Play and its role in the mental development of the child; in Russian). Voprosy psikhologii, 12(6), 62–76. [English translation by N. Veresov and M. Barrs is published in 2016 in International Research in Early Childhood Education 7 (2): 3–25 and available online at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1138861.pdf.]

  • Weeks, C. 2008. Interview with Evelyne Barbin. HPM Newsletter 67: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitton, S. 1998. The playful ways of mathematicians’ work. In Play from birth to twelve and beyond: Contexts, perspectives, and meanings, ed. D.P Fromberg and D. Bergen, 473–481. New York and London: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. 1915. Is mathematical certainty absolute? The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 568–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, M.V. 1956. Automatic digital computers. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Loveridge, J., M. Taylor, S. Sharma, and N. Hāwera. 2006. Students’ perspectives on the nature of mathematics. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Identities, Cultures and Learning Spaces. (Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia). Adelaide, SA: MERGA, vol. 2, pp. 583–590. Available online at https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/handle/10289/2129.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-François Maheux .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maheux, JF. (2018). The Unsettling Playfulness of Computing. In: Volkov, A., Freiman, V. (eds) Computations and Computing Devices in Mathematics Education Before the Advent of Electronic Calculators. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73396-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73396-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73394-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73396-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics