Skip to main content

Peripheral Nerve Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 683 Accesses

Abstract

Peripheral nerve evaluation (PNE) is an important initial step in assessing patient eligibility for permanent implantation of the sacral nerve stimulation system. PNE has been used since 1997 for the initial test phase and maintains many advantages. Advances in lead wire technology have increased the frequency of the initial test phase being performed in the operating room; however, this is an expensive and labor intensive technique. PNE is an office-based procedure, which is considered to be relatively easy for providers, as well as fast and safe for patients. In this chapter we discuss the historical evolution of PNE, the technique and tools to aid in correct placement, and compare its use to placement of the tined lead wire in the operating room.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. InterStim® sales analysis of 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Faraday M, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015;193:1572–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Paquette IM, Varma MG, Kaiser AM, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Clinical Practice guideline for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(7):623–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Azab A, Siegel S. Specific tips for general controversies in sacral neuromodulation. Curr Urol Rep. 2016;17:79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen B, Tunuguntla H, Gousse A. Predictors of success for the first stage neuromodulation: motor versus sensory response. J Urol. 2006;175:2178–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Janknegt R, Weil E, Eerdmans P. Improving neuromodulation technique for refractory voiding dysfunctions: two stage implant. Adult Urol. 1997;49:358–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodine P, Falkner P, Brelje T, et al. Sacral foramen localization for needle placement: diagnostic ultrasound vs. fluoroscopy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(S1):S90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Siegel S, Noblett K, Mangel J, et al. Results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study evaluating sacral neuromodulation with InterStim therapy compared to standard medical therapy at 6-months in subjects with mild symptoms of overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:224–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pannek J, Grigoleit U, Hinkel A. Bacterial contamination of test stimulation leads during percutaneous nerve stimulation. J Urol. June 2005;65:1096–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Siegel S, Catanzaro F, Dijkema H et al. Long-term results of a multicenter study on sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of urinary urge incontinence, urgency-frequency, and retention. Urology. 2000;56(Suppl. 6A).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bosch J, Groen J. Sacral nerve neuromodulation in the treatment of patients with refractory motor urge incontinence: long-term results of a prospective longitudinal study. J Urol. 2000;163:1219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spinelli M, Giardiello G, Gerber M, et al. New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience. J Urol. 2003;170:1905–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Kerrebroek P, Voskuilen A, Heesakkers J, et al. Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. J Urol. 2007;178:2029–34.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Auterio S, Hallas N, Betts N, et al. The cost-effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for the treatment of idiopathic medically refractory overactive bladder (wet) in the UK. BJU Int. 2015;116(6):945–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Amend B, Khalil M, Kessler T, et al. How does sacral modulation work best? Placement and programming techniques to maximize efficacy. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(5):327–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sievert KD, Nagele U, Pannek J, et al. Subcutaneous tunneling of the temporary testing electrode significantly improves the success rate of subchronic sacral nerve modulation. World J Urol. 2007;25:607–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Noblett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Noblett, K., Sudol, N.T. (2018). Peripheral Nerve Evaluation. In: Gilleran, J., Alpert, S. (eds) Adult and Pediatric Neuromodulation . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73266-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73266-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73265-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73266-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics