Abstract
Sustainable bioeconomy is being revised in tropical megabiodiverse developing countries. Given competing economic interests and development inequities, biodiversity may require becoming a strategic and central resource in national economies to ensure political feasibility of bioeconomic models. This paper attempts to address the need to document alternative approaches to transition to sustainable bioeconomy in the context of extractive economies in tropical and megabiodiverse developing countries. Using a case study approach, it reviews the Ecuadorian experience to developing a bio-industry value chain as an institutional arrangement that can enable a more efficient and integrated use of biological resources towards a sustainable and resilient economy, while addressing structural development and biodiversity protection challenges. Knowledge generated from this research can assist policymakers working on optimal design of instruments aiming at unraveling the full potential for biodiversity as a key resource in development strategies of tropical megabiodiverse countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Amsden A (2001) The rise of “The Rest”. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Barbier EB, Burgess JC, Folke C (1994) Paradise lost? The ecological economics of biodiversity. Earthscan, London
BCE (2012) Información Estadística Mensual No. 1930. Banco Central del Ecuador, Quito
BCE (2015) Información Estadística Mensual No. 1966. Banco Central del Ecuador, Quito
BCE (2016) Información Estadística Mensual No. 1978. Banco Central del Ecuador, Quito
Boerrke PJ (2001) Putting the ‘political’ back into political economy. In: Biddle JE, Davis JB, Medema SG (eds) Economics broadly considered. Routledge, London and New York
Braig M, Costa S, Göbel B (2015) Social inequalities and global interdependences in Latin America: a provisional appraisal. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas Y Sociales 60(1):209–236
Cassiolato JE, Schmitz H (2002) Hi-tech for industrial development: lessons from the Brazilian experience in electronics and automation. Routledge, London
Childs J, Hearn J (2017) “New” nations: resource-based development imaginaries in Ghana and Ecuador. Third World Q 38(4):844–861
Cornia GA (2014) Falling inequality in Latin America: policy changes and lessons. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cypher JM, Alfaro Y (2016) Triángulo del neo-desarrollismo en el Ecuador. Problemas del Desarrollo 47(185):163–186
Domínguez R, Caria S (2016) Ecuador in the middle income trap. Problemas Del Desarrollo 47(187):89–112
Duff A, Padilla A (2015) Latin America: agricultural perspectives. Retrieved from https://economics.rabobank.com/publications/2015/september/latin-america-agricultural-perspectives/
Espinel R (2009) Economía política de la biodiversidad: conocimientos ancestrales y derechos de propiedad. In: Martín Mayoral F (ed) Deuda externa y economía ecológica: dos visiones críticas. FLACSO Ecuador, Quito, p 13
EU (2012) Innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. European Commission COM(2012)—Brussels
Falconí F, Larrea C (2004) Impactos ambientales de las políticas de liberalización externa y los flujos de capital: el caso de Ecuador. In: Falconí F, Hercowitz M, Muradian R (eds) Globalización y desarrollo en América Latina. FLACSO, Quito
Falconí F, Vallejo MC (2012) Transiciones socioecológicas en la región andina. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica 18:53–71
Gachet I, Grijalva DF, Ponce P, Rodríguez D (2016) Vertical and horizontal inequality in Ecuador: the lack of sustainability (WIDER Working Paper No. 2016/106). p 37
Giljum S, Eisenmenger N (2004) North-south trade and the distribution of environmental goods and burdens: a biophysical perspective. The J Environ Dev 13(1):73–100
Golden JS, Handfield R (2014) The emergent industrial bioeconomy. Ind Biotechnol 10(6):371–375
Golinelli S, Vega-Villa K, Villa-Romero JF (2015) Biodiversidad: ciencia ciudadana, saberes originarios y biodiversidad aplicada en la economía social del conocimiento. In: Vila-Viñas D, Barandiaran XE (eds) Buen Conocer/ FLOK Society: Modelos sostenibles y políticas públicas para una economía social del conocimiento común y abierto en Ecuador. IAEN-CIESPAL, Quito, Ecuador, pp 345–396 Digital
Hill AB (2000) International markets for genetic resources: opportunities for Colombia. Science, technology and innovation. Discussion Paper No. 2, Center for International Development, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
IMF (2016) Ecuador: purchase under the rapid financing instrument (Tech. Rep. International Monetary Fund—IMF Country Report No. 16/288), p 38
Jha V (2008) Environmental priorities and trade policy for environmental goods: a reality check. ICTSD Issue Paper, No 7
Kloppenburg J (2014) Re-purposing the master’s tools: the open source seed initiative and the struggle for seed sovereignty. The J Peasant Stud 41(6):1225–1246
Li TM (2009) Exit from agriculture: a step forward or a step backward for the rural poor? The J Peasant Stud 36(3):629–636
MAE (2016a) Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad 2015–2030. Ecuador, Quito
MAE (2016b) Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad 2030. Ambiente 2035- Aportes Al Debate de La Política Ambiental, 5
MAE (2017) Plan de Acción 2015–2021 para implementar la Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad. Quito, Ecuador
Marconi S (1985) Tendencias estructurales del sector agrícola ecuatoriano. Cuestiones Económicas, 11, Banco Central del Ecuador
Marconi S, Samaniego P (1995) Las fuentes del crecimiento económico: una perspectiva a partir de la demanda. Notas Técnicas, 19, Banco Central del Ecuador
Marx K (1847) The poverty of philosophy: answer to the “philosophy of poverty” by M. Proudhon. Progress Publishers, Moscow; (reprinted 1955)
OECD (2009) The bioeconomy to 2030: designing a policy agenda. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris
Piotrowski S, Carus M, Carrez D (2016) European bioeconomy in figures. Brussels
Polanyi K (1944) The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press, Boston, MA
Rival L, Muradian R, Larrea C (2015) New trends confronting old structures or old threats frustrating new hopes? ECLAC’s compacts for equality. Dev Change 46(4):961–978
Russi D, Gonzalez-Martinez AC, Silva-Macher JC, Giljum S, Martínez-Alier J, Vallejo MC (2008) Material flows in Latin America. J Ind Ecol 12(5–6):704–720
Safrin S (2004) Hyperownership in a time of biotechnological promise: the international conflict to control the building blocks of life. The Am J Inter Law 98(4):641
Schmid AA (1987) Property, power, and public choice: an inquiry into law and economics. Praeger Publishers, New York
Schmid A (2004) Methods. In: Conflict and cooperation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, pp 138–162
Scott JC (1985) Weapons of the weak. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo (SENPLADES) (2013) Plan Nacional de Desarrollo del Buen Vivir 2013–2017. SENPLADES, Quito
SIISE (2016) Distribución del Ingreso: Coeficiente de Gini. Available at http://www.siise.gob.ec/siiseweb/siiseweb.html?sistema=1#
Sillanpää M, Ncibi C (2017) A sustainable bioeconomy: the green industrial revolution. Springer, Berlin
Vallejo MC (2006) Estructura biofísica de la economía ecuatoriana: un estudio de los flujos directos de materiales. Revibec: Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica 4:55–72
Vicepresidencia del Ecuador (2015) Estrategia Nacional para el Cambio de la Matriz Productiva. Quito
Vivarelli M (2014) Innovation, employment and skills in advanced and developing countries: a survey of economic literature. J Econ Issues 48(1):123–154
Walsh C (2010) Development as Buen Vivir: institutional arrangements and (de)colonial entanglements. Development 53(1):15–21
Wells MP (1998) Institutions and incentives for biodiversity conservation. Biodivers Conserv 7(6):815–835
Wong S, Kulmer V (2011) Poverty impacts of trade integration with the European Union: lessons for Ecuador. In: Durán Lima J, LaFleur M, Pellandra A (eds) Trade, poverty and complementary policies in Latin America. CEPAL, Santiago, pp 35–64
WWF (2016) Living planet report 2016. Gland, Switzerland
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ortega-Pacheco, D.V., Silva, A., López, A., Espinel, R., Inclán, D., Mendoza-Jiménez, M.J. (2018). Tropicalizing Sustainable Bioeconomy: Initial Lessons from Ecuador. In: Leal Filho, W., Pociovălișteanu, D., Borges de Brito, P., Borges de Lima, I. (eds) Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73027-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73028-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)