Skip to main content

Tropicalizing Sustainable Bioeconomy: Initial Lessons from Ecuador

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Sustainable bioeconomy is being revised in tropical megabiodiverse developing countries. Given competing economic interests and development inequities, biodiversity may require becoming a strategic and central resource in national economies to ensure political feasibility of bioeconomic models. This paper attempts to address the need to document alternative approaches to transition to sustainable bioeconomy in the context of extractive economies in tropical and megabiodiverse developing countries. Using a case study approach, it reviews the Ecuadorian experience to developing a bio-industry value chain as an institutional arrangement that can enable a more efficient and integrated use of biological resources towards a sustainable and resilient economy, while addressing structural development and biodiversity protection challenges. Knowledge generated from this research can assist policymakers working on optimal design of instruments aiming at unraveling the full potential for biodiversity as a key resource in development strategies of tropical megabiodiverse countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amsden A (2001) The rise of “The Rest”. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB, Burgess JC, Folke C (1994) Paradise lost? The ecological economics of biodiversity. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • BCE (2012) Información Estadística Mensual No. 1930. Banco Central del Ecuador, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • BCE (2015) Información Estadística Mensual No. 1966. Banco Central del Ecuador, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • BCE (2016) Información Estadística Mensual No. 1978. Banco Central del Ecuador, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Boerrke PJ (2001) Putting the ‘political’ back into political economy. In: Biddle JE, Davis JB, Medema SG (eds) Economics broadly considered. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Braig M, Costa S, Göbel B (2015) Social inequalities and global interdependences in Latin America: a provisional appraisal. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas Y Sociales 60(1):209–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiolato JE, Schmitz H (2002) Hi-tech for industrial development: lessons from the Brazilian experience in electronics and automation. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs J, Hearn J (2017) “New” nations: resource-based development imaginaries in Ghana and Ecuador. Third World Q 38(4):844–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornia GA (2014) Falling inequality in Latin America: policy changes and lessons. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cypher JM, Alfaro Y (2016) Triángulo del neo-desarrollismo en el Ecuador. Problemas del Desarrollo 47(185):163–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez R, Caria S (2016) Ecuador in the middle income trap. Problemas Del Desarrollo 47(187):89–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff A, Padilla A (2015) Latin America: agricultural perspectives. Retrieved from https://economics.rabobank.com/publications/2015/september/latin-america-agricultural-perspectives/

  • Espinel R (2009) Economía política de la biodiversidad: conocimientos ancestrales y derechos de propiedad. In: Martín Mayoral F (ed) Deuda externa y economía ecológica: dos visiones críticas. FLACSO Ecuador, Quito, p 13

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2012) Innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. European Commission COM(2012)—Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconí F, Larrea C (2004) Impactos ambientales de las políticas de liberalización externa y los flujos de capital: el caso de Ecuador. In: Falconí F, Hercowitz M, Muradian R (eds) Globalización y desarrollo en América Latina. FLACSO, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconí F, Vallejo MC (2012) Transiciones socioecológicas en la región andina. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica 18:53–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Gachet I, Grijalva DF, Ponce P, Rodríguez D (2016) Vertical and horizontal inequality in Ecuador: the lack of sustainability (WIDER Working Paper No. 2016/106). p 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Giljum S, Eisenmenger N (2004) North-south trade and the distribution of environmental goods and burdens: a biophysical perspective. The J Environ Dev 13(1):73–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden JS, Handfield R (2014) The emergent industrial bioeconomy. Ind Biotechnol 10(6):371–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golinelli S, Vega-Villa K, Villa-Romero JF (2015) Biodiversidad: ciencia ciudadana, saberes originarios y biodiversidad aplicada en la economía social del conocimiento. In: Vila-Viñas D, Barandiaran XE (eds) Buen Conocer/ FLOK Society: Modelos sostenibles y políticas públicas para una economía social del conocimiento común y abierto en Ecuador. IAEN-CIESPAL, Quito, Ecuador, pp 345–396 Digital

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill AB (2000) International markets for genetic resources: opportunities for Colombia. Science, technology and innovation. Discussion Paper No. 2, Center for International Development, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF (2016) Ecuador: purchase under the rapid financing instrument (Tech. Rep. International Monetary Fund—IMF Country Report No. 16/288), p 38

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha V (2008) Environmental priorities and trade policy for environmental goods: a reality check. ICTSD Issue Paper, No 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg J (2014) Re-purposing the master’s tools: the open source seed initiative and the struggle for seed sovereignty. The J Peasant Stud 41(6):1225–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li TM (2009) Exit from agriculture: a step forward or a step backward for the rural poor? The J Peasant Stud 36(3):629–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAE (2016a) Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad 2015–2030. Ecuador, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • MAE (2016b) Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad 2030. Ambiente 2035- Aportes Al Debate de La Política Ambiental, 5

    Google Scholar 

  • MAE (2017) Plan de Acción 2015–2021 para implementar la Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad. Quito, Ecuador

    Google Scholar 

  • Marconi S (1985) Tendencias estructurales del sector agrícola ecuatoriano. Cuestiones Económicas, 11, Banco Central del Ecuador

    Google Scholar 

  • Marconi S, Samaniego P (1995) Las fuentes del crecimiento económico: una perspectiva a partir de la demanda. Notas Técnicas, 19, Banco Central del Ecuador

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1847) The poverty of philosophy: answer to the “philosophy of poverty” by M. Proudhon. Progress Publishers, Moscow; (reprinted 1955)

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009) The bioeconomy to 2030: designing a policy agenda. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowski S, Carus M, Carrez D (2016) European bioeconomy in figures. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi K (1944) The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rival L, Muradian R, Larrea C (2015) New trends confronting old structures or old threats frustrating new hopes? ECLAC’s compacts for equality. Dev Change 46(4):961–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russi D, Gonzalez-Martinez AC, Silva-Macher JC, Giljum S, Martínez-Alier J, Vallejo MC (2008) Material flows in Latin America. J Ind Ecol 12(5–6):704–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safrin S (2004) Hyperownership in a time of biotechnological promise: the international conflict to control the building blocks of life. The Am J Inter Law 98(4):641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid AA (1987) Property, power, and public choice: an inquiry into law and economics. Praeger Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid A (2004) Methods. In: Conflict and cooperation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, pp 138–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JC (1985) Weapons of the weak. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo (SENPLADES) (2013) Plan Nacional de Desarrollo del Buen Vivir 2013–2017. SENPLADES, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • SIISE (2016) Distribución del Ingreso: Coeficiente de Gini. Available at http://www.siise.gob.ec/siiseweb/siiseweb.html?sistema=1#

  • Sillanpää M, Ncibi C (2017) A sustainable bioeconomy: the green industrial revolution. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallejo MC (2006) Estructura biofísica de la economía ecuatoriana: un estudio de los flujos directos de materiales. Revibec: Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica 4:55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicepresidencia del Ecuador (2015) Estrategia Nacional para el Cambio de la Matriz Productiva. Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivarelli M (2014) Innovation, employment and skills in advanced and developing countries: a survey of economic literature. J Econ Issues 48(1):123–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh C (2010) Development as Buen Vivir: institutional arrangements and (de)colonial entanglements. Development 53(1):15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells MP (1998) Institutions and incentives for biodiversity conservation. Biodivers Conserv 7(6):815–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong S, Kulmer V (2011) Poverty impacts of trade integration with the European Union: lessons for Ecuador. In: Durán Lima J, LaFleur M, Pellandra A (eds) Trade, poverty and complementary policies in Latin America. CEPAL, Santiago, pp 35–64

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF (2016) Living planet report 2016. Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel V. Ortega-Pacheco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ortega-Pacheco, D.V., Silva, A., López, A., Espinel, R., Inclán, D., Mendoza-Jiménez, M.J. (2018). Tropicalizing Sustainable Bioeconomy: Initial Lessons from Ecuador. In: Leal Filho, W., Pociovălișteanu, D., Borges de Brito, P., Borges de Lima, I. (eds) Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics