Skip to main content

Failure in Public Institutions: Characteristics of Organizational Culture in the Military

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Strategies in Failure Management

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

In this chapter forms of failure in the military are introduced and discussed. Failure in the military is intertwined with organizational culture and therefore with cultural standards of the specific society. Nonetheless the definition of failure and success follows the specific logic of the military and its different states of action: cold for training and hot for deployment. How do organizational culture and military success (or failure) work in these different states?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Phyrrus was king of Epirus (after 300 B. C.) who triumphed over the Romans in several battles, but lost so many men, that Plutarch quotes him with the word “If we are victorious in one more battle, we shall be utterly ruined.”

  2. 2.

    See also Badke-Schaub and Hofinger (2018).

  3. 3.

    See also Tesch (2018).

  4. 4.

    See also Kunert and Staar (2018).

References

  • Bateson, G., Jackson, D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. (1962). A note on the double bind. Family Issues, 62(1), 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehl, H., & Kümmel, G. (2014). Ritual und Bundeswehr. In M. Staak (Ed.), Im Ziel? Zur Aktualität der Inneren Führung (pp. 43–75). Opladen: Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burges, A. (1986). A clockwork orange. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausewitz, C. v. (1990). Vom Kriege. Augsburg: Weltbild.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. (1964). The functions of social conflict. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1979). Die Zwänge kollektiven Handelns. Über Macht und Organisation. Königstein: Athenäum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbe, M. (2011). Uncertainty in institutional change. Individual resources as potential. In S. Jeschke, I. Isenhardt, F. Hees, & S. Trantow (Eds.), Enabling innovation. Innovative capability – German and international views (pp. 85–96). Berlin/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbe, M. (2013). Employography: Flüchtige Identitäten in Zeiten der Ungewissheit. Journal für Psychologie, 3, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbe, M. (2014). Das double bind-problem – Kann man zwei Herren dienen? Controlling & Management Review. Special Edition, 3, 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbe, M. (2017). Ritual, Führung & Skandal: Alte Stücke neu inszeniert. BehördenSpiegel newsletter Verteidigung. Streitkräfte. Wehrtechnik, 181, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbe, M., & Peters, S. (2016). Die temporäre Organisation: Grundlagen der Kooperation, Gestaltung und Beratung. Berlin: SpringerGabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elbe, M., & Richter, G. (2011). Militär: Institution und Organisation. In N. Leonhard & I.-J. Werkner (Eds.), Militärsoziologie – Eine Einführung (2nd ed., pp. 244–263). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1997). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. (1960). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger, E. (2016). Storm of steel. New York: Penguine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunert, S. (2016). Lernförderliche Arbeitsgestaltung und Innovation. ABWF-Bulletin, 16(1), 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskos, C. (1977). From institution to occupation: Trends in military organizations. Armed Forces & Society, 77(4), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pointner, N., & Schäfer, S. (2007). Algerien. Unabhängigkeit, verhinderte Islamisierung und Stabilisierung. In A. Straßner & M. Klein (Eds.), Wenn Staaten scheitern: Theorie und Empirie des Staatszerfalls (pp. 93–108). Wiesbaden: VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, G., & Elbe, M. (2011). Militär und Verwaltung. In N. Leonhard & I.-J. Werkner (Eds.), Militärsoziologie – Eine Einführung (2nd ed., pp. 264–283). Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeters, J., Winslow, D., & Weibull, A. (2003). Military culture. In G. Caforio (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of the military (pp. 237–254). New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winslow, D. (1999). Rites of passage and group bonding in Canadian Airborne. Armed Forces & Society, 99(3), 429–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badke-Schaub, P., & Hofinger, G. (2018). Failure in teams – Why successful teams do not fail (so often). In S. Kunert (Ed.), Strategies in failure management: Scientific insights, case studies and tools. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesch, C. (2018). Failure in public relations – Non-profit organizations facing growing challenges. In S. Kunert (Ed.), Strategies in failure management: Scientific insights, case studies and tools. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunert, S., & Staar, H. (2018). Failure in organizational change. In S. Kunert (Ed.), Strategies in failure management: Scientific insights, case studies and tools. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Online Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Elbe, M. (2018). Failure in Public Institutions: Characteristics of Organizational Culture in the Military. In: Kunert, S. (eds) Strategies in Failure Management. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72757-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics