Abstract
This chapter takes a relational understanding of agency as its starting point in order to systematise up-to-date approaches to reconceptualising the body in childhood studies. Starting from the observation that childhood studies has long had difficulty with the theorisation of the body, empirical studies are presented that approach the child’s body from the perspective of science and technology studies, of practice theory and of phenomenology. The thesis of the chapter is that the yield of a theorisation of the body is not limited to this, but, at the same time, helps to overcome common dichotomies in childhood studies between childhood as a social construct and children as actors. These can be dissolved in favour of a concept of childhood that is both material and social.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bollig, S., & Kelle, H. (2016). Children as participants in practice. In F. Eßer, M. S. Baader, T. Betz, & B. Hungerland (Eds.), Reconceptualising agency and childhood. New perspectives in Childhood Studies (pp. 34–47). London: Routledge.
Burman, E. (1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London, New York: Routledge.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–223). London: Routledge.
Castañeda, C. (2002). Figurations. Child, bodies, worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
Cockburn, T. (2013). Rethinking children’s citizenship. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Crossley, N. (2001). The social body. Habit, identity and desire. London [u.a.]: SAGE.
Crossley, N. (2006). The networked body and the question of reflexivity. In D. Waskul & P. Vannini (Eds.), Body/embodiment. Symbolic interaction and the sociology of the body (pp. 21–33). Hampshire: Ashgate.
Dépelteau, F. (2013). What is the direction of the ‘relational turn’? In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology. Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 163–185). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Eßer, F. (2015). Fabricating the developing child in institutions of education. A historical approach to documentation. Children & Society, 29(3), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12113.
Eßer, F. (2016). Children’s agency and welfare organizations from an intergenerational perspective. In S. Punch, R. Vanderbeck, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Families, intergenerationality, and peer group relations (pp. 1–22). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-92-7_21-1.
Eßer, F. (2017a). Enacting the overweight body in residential child care: Eating and agency beyond the nature–culture divide. Childhood, 24(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568216688245.
Eßer, F. (2017b). Touch in residential child care: Staff’s bodies and children’s agency. European Journal of Social Work, 20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1289898,1-11.
Eßer, F., Baader, M. S., Betz, T., & Hungerland, B. (Eds.). (2016). Reconceptualising agency and childhood. New perspectives in Childhood Studies. London: Routledge.
Fuchs, S. (2001a). Against essentialism. A theory of culture and society. Cambridge u.a.: Harvard University Press.
Fuchs, S. (2001b). Beyond agency. Sociological Theory, 19(1), 24–40.
Goodwin, D. (2008). Refashioning bodies, reshaping agency. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(3), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907306694.
Grosz, E. (1995). Space, time and perversion: Essays on the politics of bodies. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto. Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In D. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, cyborgs and women (pp. 149–181). New York: Routledge.
Hays, S. (1994). Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture. Sociological Theory, 12(1), 57–72.
Heidegger, M. (1927/2001). Sein und Zeit (18 Aufl.). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
James, A. (2009). Agency. In J. Qvortrup, W. A. Corsaro, & M.-S. Honig (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of Childhood Studies (pp. 34–45). Basingstoke, Hampshire u.a.: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kelle, H. (2010). Age-Appropriate Development’ as Measure and Norm. An ethnographic study on the practical anthropology of routine paediatric checkups. Childhood, 17(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568209351548.
Kraftl, P. (2013). Beyond ‘voice’, beyond ‘agency’, beyond ‘politics’? Hybrid childhoods and some critical reflections on children’s emotional geographies. Emotion, Space and Society, 9, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2013.01.004.
Kraftl, P. (2015). Alter-childhoods: Biopolitics and childhoods in alternative education spaces. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(1), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.962969.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (1999). After ANT. Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after. Oxford u.a.: Blackwell.
Leder, D. (1990). Flesh and blood: A proposed supplement to Merleau-Ponty. Human Studies, 13, 209–219.
Lee, N. (2008). Awake, asleep, adult, child: An a-humanist account of persons. Body & Society, 14(4), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X08096895.
Lee, N., & Motzkau, J. (2011). Navigating the bio-politics of childhood. Childhood, 18(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568210371526.
Lynch, M. (1997). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012/1945). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
Middleton, D., & Brown, S. D. (2005). Net-working on a neonatal intensive care unit. The baby as a virtual object. In B. Czarniawska & T. Hernes (Eds.), Actor-network theory and organizing (pp. 307–350). Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
Mol, A. (2013). Mind your plate! The ontonorms of Dutch dieting. Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712456948.
Moran-Ellis, J., & Venn, S. (2007). The sleeping lives of children and teenagers: Night-worlds and arenas of action. Sociological Research Online, 12(5), http://www.socresonline.org.uk.
Oswell, D. (2013). The agency of children. From family to global human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oswell, D. (2016). Re-aligning children’s agency and re-socialising children in Childhood Studies. In F. Eßer, M. S. Baader, T. Betz, & B. Hungerland (Eds.), Reconceptualising agency and childhood. New perspectives in Childhood Studies (pp. 19–33). London: Routledge.
Place, B. (2000). Constructing the bodies of ill children in the intensive care unit. In A. Prout (Ed.), The body, childhood and society (pp. 172–194). Houndmills: Macmillan.
Prout, A. (2000). Childhood bodies. Construction, agency and hybridity. In A. Prout (Ed.), The body, childhood and society (pp. 1–18). Houndmills: Macmillan.
Prout, A., & James, A. (1990). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood. Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (pp. 7–34). London/New York/Philadelphia: Routledge/Falmer.
Reckwitz, A. (2010). Toward a theory of social practices. A development in culturalist theorizing. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Interpretive political science (pp. 275–298). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Ryan, K. W. (2011). The new wave of Childhood Studies: Breaking the grip of bio-social dualism? Childhood, 19(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568211427612.
Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. V. Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 10–23). London: Routledge.
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & Savigny, E. V. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
Schulz, M. (2015). The documentation of children’s learning in early childhood education. Children & Society, 29(3), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12112.
Sharrock, W. (2004). What Garfinkel makes of Schutz: The past, present and future of an alternate, asymmetric and incommensurable approach to sociology. Theory & Science, 5(1), 1–13.
Shilling, C. (2012). The body and social theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles [u.a.]: SAGE.
Stainton Rogers, R., & Stainton Rogers, W. (1992). Stories of childhood. Shifting agendas of child concern. Hassocks: Harvester.
Tahhan, D. A. (2008). Depth and space in sleep: Intimacy, touch and the body in Japanese co-sleeping rituals. Body & Society, 14(4), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X08096894.
Turmel, A. (2008). A historical sociology of childhood. Developmental thinking, categorization and graphic visualization. Cambridge u.a.: Cambridge University Press.
Valentine, G. (2010). Children’s bodies: An absent presence. In K. Hörschelmann & R. Colls (Eds.), Contested bodies of childhood and youth (pp. 22–37). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Valentine, K. (2011). Accounting for agency. Children & Society, 25, 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00279.x.
van de Port, M., & Mol, A. (2015). Chupar frutas in Salvador da Bahia: A case of practice-specific alterities. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 21(1), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12151.
Wacquant, L. c. (2015). For a sociology of flesh and blood. Qualitative Sociology, 38, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9291-y.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eßer, F. (2018). Theorising Children’s Bodies. A Critical Review of Relational Understandings in Childhood Studies. In: Baraldi, C., Cockburn, T. (eds) Theorising Childhood. Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72673-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72673-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72672-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72673-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)