Skip to main content

Parastomal Hernia Prevention and Treatment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Art of Hernia Surgery

Abstract

Parastomal hernia (PH) is the most frequent complication associated with the presence of a colostomy [1]. According to EHS [2], a PH can be defined as an abnormal protrusion of the contents of the abdominal cavity through the abdominal wall defect created during placement of a colostomy, ileostomy, or ileal conduit stoma. The incidence of the disease is variably depicted in current literature biased by the retrospective nature of most of the studies. In recent years thanks to well-conducted RCTs, a clearer picture of the problem has been defined. Considering control arms of RCTs on mesh prophylaxis, the true overall incidence of PH has been estimated to be 55%, with a follow-up ranging from 10 to 80 months [3]. When analyzing time pattern of development, mainly in retrospective studies, it has been showed [4] that the risk of hernia development remains nearly constant over time, confirming the degenerative and iatrogenic nature of the condition. No direct study has ever compared directly techniques of construction, so there’s some form of uncertainty with respect to hernia rates among different type of ostomy. An overview of the literature suggests that end colostomy is associated with the highest incidence of parastomal hernia. Loop ileostomy was associated with a parastomal hernia incidence of 16% at 4 months in a RCT, where diagnosis was done during surgery for continuity restoration [5]. A similar incidence was reported in a case series with a clinical diagnosis of parastomal hernia at a mean follow-up of 9 years [6].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gillern S, Bleier JIS. Parastomal hernia repair and reinforcement: The role of biologic and synthetic materials. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014;27:162–71. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1394090.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Śmietański M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA, et al. European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias. Hernia. 2014;18:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1162-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shabbir J, Chaudhary BN, Dawson R. A systematic review on the use of prophylactic mesh during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia formation. Color Dis. 2012;14:931–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02835.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong APK, Phillips RKS. Complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1980;62:916–20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hardt J, Seyfried S, Weiß C, et al. A pilot single-centre randomized trial assessing the safety and efficacy of lateral pararectus abdominis compared with transrectus abdominis muscle stoma placement in patients with temporary loop ileostomies: the PATRASTOM trial. Color Dis. 2016;18:O81–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leong AP, Londono-Schimmer EE, Phillips RK. Life-table analysis of stomal complications following ileostomy. Br J Surg. 1994;81:727–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pianka F, Probst P, Keller A-V, et al. Prophylactic mesh placement for the PREvention of paraSTOmal hernias: The PRESTO systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0171548. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nastro P, Knowles CH, McGrath A, et al. Complications of intestinal stomas. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1885–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kroese LF, de Smet GHJ, Jeekel J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal colostomy for preventing parastomal hernia. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:688–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hardt J, Meerpohl JJ, Metzendorf M-I, et al. Lateral pararectal versus transrectal stoma placement for prevention of parastomal herniation. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013:CD009487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009487.pub2.

  11. Hong SY, Oh SY, Lee JH, et al. Risk factors for parastomal hernia: based on radiological definition. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;84:43–7. https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.84.1.43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bayer I, Kyzer S, Chaimoff C. A new approach to primary strengthening of colostomy with Marlex mesh to prevent paracolostomy hernia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986;163:579–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A, et al. The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. Color Dis. 2009;11:173–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01564.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Devlin H, Kingsnorth AN. Management of abdominal hernias. London: Hodder Arnold Publishers; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ, Matthews JB. Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg. 1994;129:413–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gil G, Szczepkowski M. A new classification of parastomal hernias—from the experience at Bielanski Hospital in Warsaw. Pol Przegl Chir. 2011;83:430–7. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10035-011-0067-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansson B, Morales-Conde S, Mussack T, et al. The laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and has a low recurrence rate: a multicentre cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:494–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2464-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansson BME, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS, et al. Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg. 2012;255:685–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824b44b1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13:407–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tandon A, Shahzad K, Pathak S, et al. Parietex™ Composite mesh versus DynaMesh(®)-IPOM for laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016;98:568–73. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2016.0292.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Robinson TN, Clarke JH, Schoen J, Walsh MD. Major mesh-related complications following hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1556–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0120-y.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jänes A, Weisby L, Israelsson LA. Parastomal hernia: clinical and radiological definitions. Hernia. 2011;15:189–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0769-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS])—Part III Section 7: mesh technology. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:380–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))—part 2. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Coda A, Lamberti R, Martorana S. Classification of prosthetics used in hernia repair based on weight and biomaterial. Hernia. 2012;16:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0868-z.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3:39–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Berger D, Bientzle M. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon’s experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1668–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9028-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Berger D, Bientzle M. Polyvinylidene fluoride: a suitable mesh material for laparoscopic incisional and parastomal hernia repair! A prospective, observational study with 344 patients. Hernia. 2009;13:167–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0435-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Slater NJ, Hansson BME, Buyne OR, et al. Repair of parastomal hernias with biologic grafts: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:1252–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1435-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Warwick AM, Velineni R, Smart NJ, Daniels IR. Onlay parastomal hernia repair with cross-linked porcine dermal collagen biologic mesh: long-term results. Hernia. 2016;20:321–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1452-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Novitsky YW, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB, Rosen MJ. Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. AJS. 2012;204:709–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li J, Ji Z, Zhang W, Li L. The comparison of lightweight mesh and standard mesh in incisional hernia repair with the open sublay technique: the results of a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015;25:238–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stabilini, C., Gianetta, E. (2018). Parastomal Hernia Prevention and Treatment. In: Campanelli, G. (eds) The Art of Hernia Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72626-7_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72626-7_66

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72624-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72626-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics