Abstract
In the USA, the incidence and prevalence of groin and ventral/incisional hernia are unknown, but current estimates suggest that both hernia types represent a common condition with potential morbidity. Various medical conditions prevalent in the USA impact the formation and recurrence of hernias. Increasingly US surgeons are educating patients about modifiable risk factors that impact the success of hernia repair. The USA continues to see a change in the types of operative techniques used for hernia repair. Another paradigm shift occurring in the USA is the way surgeons think about mesh type and location for hernia reinforcement. Outcomes assessment remains a critical topic of discussion and ongoing research among US surgeons. The following chapter will outline hernia epidemiology as well as current trends in pre-habilitation, operative techniques specifically robot-assisted hernia repair, preferred mesh type and location, and surgical outcomes reporting and mentorship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
National Center for Health Services. US National Health Survey. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1960.
Beadles CA, Meagher AD, Charles AG. Trends in emergent hernia repair in the United States. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:194–200.
Fitzgibbons RJ, Forse RA. Clinical practice. Groin hernias in adults. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:753–63.
Jensen KK, Henriksen JA, Jorgensen LN. Inguinal hernia epidemiology. In: Hope WW, Cobb WS, Adrales GL, editors. Textbook of hernia. Cham: Springer International; 2017. p. 23–8.
Alaedeen DI. Introduction and epidemiology of incisional hernias and the argument for mesh in incisional hernia repair. In: Hope WW, Cobb WS, Adrales GL, editors. Textbook of hernia. Cham: Springer International; 2017. p. 177–9.
Rutkow IM. Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;(5):1045–51.
Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, et al. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia. 2012;16:179–83.
Kaoutzanis C, Leichtle SW, Mouawad NK, et al. Risk factors for postoperative wound infections and prolonged hospitalization after ventral/incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2015;19:113–23.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adult obesity prevalence maps. 2015. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/prevalence-maps.html. Accessed 17 May 2017.
Pernar LI, Pernar CH, Dieffenbach BV, Brooks DC, Smink DS, Tavakkoli A. What is the BMI threshold for open ventral hernia repair? Surg Endosc. 2017;31:1311–7.
Kubasiak JC, Landin M, Schimpke S, et al. The effect of tobacco use on outcomes of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a review of NSQIP dataset. Surg Endosc. 2016; Epub ahead of print.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Current smoking among adults in the United States. 2015. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/adult_data/cig_smokin/. Accessed 17 May 2017.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A snapshot: diabetes in the United States. 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/statsreport14/diabetes-infographic.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2017.
Ventral Hernia Working Group, Breuing K, Butler CE, et al. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery. 2010;148:544–58.
Berger RL, Li LT, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Kao LS, Liang MK. Development and validation of a risk-stratification score for surgical site occurrence and surgical site infection after open ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:974–82.
Goodenough CJ, Ko TC, Kao LS, et al. Development and validation of a risk stratification score for ventral incisional hernia after abdominal surgery: hernia expection rates in intra-abdominal surgery (The HERNIA Project). J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:405–13.
Baucom RB, Ousley J, Feurer ID, et al. Patient reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair—establishing the ventral hernia recurrence inventory. Am J Surg. 2016;212:81–8.
Huntington CR, Cox TC, Blair LJ, et al. Nationwide variation in outcomes and cost of laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:934–46.
Funk LM, Perry KA, Narula VK, Mikami DJ, Melvin WS. Current national practice patterns for inpatient management of ventral abdominal wall hernia in the United States. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4101–12.
Colavita PD, Walters AL, Tsirline VB, et al. The regionalization of ventral hernia repair: occurrence and outcomes over a decade. Am Surg. 2013;79:693–701.
Novitsky YW, Fayezizadeh M, Majumder A, Neupane R, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB. Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release and synthetic mesh sublay reinforcement. Ann Surg. 2016;264:226–32.
Carbonell AM, Warren JA, Prabhu AS, et al. Reducing length of stay using a robotic-assisted approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Ann Surg. 2017; Epub ahead of print.
Holihan JL, Ioana Bondre BS, Askenasy EP, et al. Sublay versus underlay in open ventral hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2016;202:26–32.
Holihan JL, Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Mo J, Kao LS, Liang MK. Mesh location in open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2016;40:89–99.
Carbonell AM, Criss CN, Cobb WS, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ. Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:991–8.
Rosen MJ, Bauer JJ, Harmaty M, et al. Multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study of the recurrence, surgical site infection, and quality of life after contaminated ventral hernia repair using biosynthetic absorbable mesh: the COBRA study. Ann Surg. 2017;265:205–11.
Fortelny RH, Petter-Puchner AH, Glaser KS, Redl H. Use of fibrin sealant (Tisseel/Tissucol) in hernia repair: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1803–12.
Deeken CR, Matthews BD. Characterization of the mechanical strength, resorption properties, and histologic characteristics of a fully absorbable material (poly-4-hydroxybutyrate – PHASIX mesh) in a porcine model of hernia repair. ISRN Surg. 2013;28:1–12.
Wormer BA, Clavin NW, Lefaivre JF, et al. Reducing postoperative abdominal bulge following deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction with onlay monofilament poly-4-hydroxybutyrate biosynthetic mesh. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017;33:8–18.
Regner JL, Mrdutt MM, Munoz-Maldonado Y. Tailoring surgical approach for elective ventral hernia repair based on obesity and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program outcomes. Am J Surg. 2015;210:1024–30.
Ousley J, Baucom RB, Stewart MK, et al. Previous methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection independent of body site increases odds of surgical site infection after ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:470–7.
Deerenberg EB, Timmermans L, Hogerzeil DP, et al. A systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia. Hernia. 2015;19:89–101.
Holihan JL, Askenasy EP, Greenberg JA, et al. Component separation vs. bridged repair for large ventral hernias: a multi-institutional risk-adjusted comparison, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016;17:17–26.
Deeken CR, Abdo MS, Frisella MM, Matthews BD. Physicomechanical evaluation of polypropylene, polyester, and polytetrafluoroethylene meshes for inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:68–79.
Deeken CR, Abdo MS, Frisella MM, Matthews BD. Physicomechanical evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier composite meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1541–52.
Liang MK, Holihan JL, Itani K, et al. Ventral hernia management: expert consensus guided by systematic review. Ann Surg. 2017;265:80–9.
Lee GI, Lee MR, Green I, Allaf M, Marohn MR. Surgeons’ physical discomfort and symptoms during robotic surgery: a comprehensive ergonomic survey study. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:1697–706.
Kudsi OY, McCarty JC, Paluvoi N, Mabardy AS. Transition from laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair to robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective review of a single surgeon’s experience. World J Surg. 2017; Epub ahead of print.
Prabhu AS, Dickens EO, Copper CM, et al. Laparoscopic vs robotic intraperitoneal mesh repair for incisional hernia: an Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2017; Epub ahead of print.
Americas Hernia Society. Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. https://www.ahsqc.org. Accessed 18 May 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bittner, J.G., Clingempeel, N.L. (2018). Hernia Repair in the United States: Current Situation and Trends. In: Campanelli, G. (eds) The Art of Hernia Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72626-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72626-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72624-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72626-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)