Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Damage Control in Trauma Care pp 263–275Cite as

The Open Abdomen in Damage Control Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 966 Accesses

Abstract

The open abdomen is an integral part of the damage control surgical philosophy although it does present its own physiological penalties; it is therefore vital that as much attention is paid to the management of the open abdomen as the other aspects of DCS and the surgeon must have a full range of techniques at their command. The predominant reason for an open abdomen in DCS is to avoid the deleterious effects of raised intra-abdominal pressure such as reduced splanchnic and renal blood supply, splinting of the diaphragm with reduced tidal volume and reduced venous return.

When the abdomen is left open, the muscle fibres shorten and retract, and the viscera begin to adhere to the underside of the abdominal wall, so the key to open abdomen management is a temporary abdominal closure that minimises loss of domain and prevents adhesion formation. A variety of techniques are available, and the method chosen should reflect the local availability of equipment and skills of the surgeon. Silo methods such as the Bogota bag should only be used if nothing else is available as the techniques of choice are some sort of medial fascial traction and topical negative pressure dressings either individually or preferably in combination.

The outcomes following temporary abdominal closure are highly variable, but definitive fascial closure rates of up to 90% are achievable; complications include failure to achieve fascial closure, fistulation and subsequent incisional hernia aside from mortality which is largely attributable to the underlying traumatic injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ogilvie WH. The late complications of abdominal war wounds. Lancet. 1940;2:253–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vargo D, Richardson D, Campbell A, et al. Management of the open abdomen: from initial operation to definitive closure. Am Surg. 2009;75(11):S1–S22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheatham ML, Safcsak K, Llerena LE, Morrow CE Jr, Block EF. Long-term physical, mental and functional consequences of abdominal decompression. J Trauma. 2004;56:237–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Malbrain MLNG, Cheatham ML, Kirkpatrick A, et al. Results from an international conference of experts on intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. Definitions. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1722–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(7):1190–206.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Saggi BH, Sugerman HJ, Ivatury RR, et al. Abdominal compartment syndrome. J Trauma. 1998;45(3):597–609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simon RJ, Friedlander MH, Ivatury RR, et al. Hemorrhage lowers the threshold for intra-abdominal hypertension-induced pulmonary dysfunction. J Trauma. 1997;42(3):398–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sugrue M, Buist D, Hurihan F, et al. Prospective study of intra-abdominal hypertension and renal function after laparotomy. Br J Surg. 1995;82:235–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Doty JM, Oda J, Ivatury RR, et al. the effects of hemodynamic shock and increased intra-abdominal pressure on bacterial translocation. J Trauma. 2002;52(1):13–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diebel L, Saxe J, Dulchavsky S. Effect of intra-abdominal pressure on abdominal wall blood flow. Am Surg. 1992;58:573–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hong JJ, Cohn SM, Perez JM, Dolich MO, Brown M, McKenney MG. Prospective study of the incidence and outcome of intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome. Br J Surg. 2002;89(5):591–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen J, Ren J, Zhang W, Li J. Open versus closed abdomen treatment on liver function in rats with sepsis and abdominal compartment syndrome. J Trauma. 2011;71(5):1319–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, Faris PD, et al. Active negative pressure peritoneal therapy after abbreviated laparotomy. Ann Surg. 2015;262:38–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Leppaniemi A, Mentula P, Hienonen P, Kemppainen E. Transverse laparotomy is feasible and effective in the treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome in severe acute pancreatitis. WJES. 2008;3:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-3-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Björck M, Kirkpatrick AW, Cheatham M, Kaplan M, Leppäniemi A, De Waele JJ. Amended classification of the open abdomen. Scand J Surg. 2016;105(1):5–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rezende-Neto JB, Moore EE, Melo de Andrade MV, et al. Systemic inflammatory response secondary to abdominal compartment syndrome: stage for multiple organ failure. J Trauma. 2002;53:1121–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheatham ML, Safcsak K, Brzezinski SJ, et al. Nitrogen balance, protein loss and the open abdomen. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:127–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang Q, Ki J, Lau W-Y. Techniques for abdominal wall closure after damage control laparotomy: from temporary closure to early/delayed fascial closure: a review. Gastro Res Prac. 2016;2016:15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2073260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de Waele JJ, Leppaniemi AK. Temporary abdominal closure techniques. Am Surg. 2011;77:S46–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tremblay LN, Felciiano DV, Schmidt J, et al. Skin only or silo closure in the critically ill patient with an open abdomen. Am J Surg. 2001;182:670–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Regner JL, Kobayashi L, Coimbra R. Surgical strategies for management of the open abdomen. World J Surg. 2012;36:497–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilde JM, Loudon MA. Modified Opsite® sandwich for temporary abdominal closure: a non-traumatic experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89:57–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Brock WB, Barker DE, Burns RP. Temporary closure of open abdominal wounds: the vacuum pack. Am Surg. 1995;61:30–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen SZ, Li J, Li XY, et al. Effects of vacuum-assisted closure on wound microcirculation: an experimental study. Asian J Surg. 2005;28:211–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moues CM, Vos CM, Bend GJ, et al. Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial. Wound Repair Regen. 2004;12:11–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Carlson GL, Patrick H, Amin AI, et al. Management of the open abdomen: a national study of clinical outcomes and safety of negative pressure wound therapy. Ann Surg. 2013;257(6):1154–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wittman DH. Staged abdominal repair: development and current practice of an advanced operative technique for diffuse suppurative peritonitis. Acta Chir Austricaca. 2000;32:171–8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Petersson U, Acosta S, Bjorck M. Vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction: a novel technique for late closure of the open abdomen. World J Surg. 2007;31:2133–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Reamer MW, Yelle J-D, Reitsma B, Doumit G, Allen MA, Bell MS. Management of open abdominal wounds with a dynamic fascial closure system. Can J Surg. 2008;51(3):209–14.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Diaz JJ Jr, Dutton WD, Ott MM, et al. Eastern association for the surgery of trauma: a review of the management of the open abdomen: part 2 “Management of the open abdomen”. J Trauma. 2011;71(2):502–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rencuzogullari A, Dalci K, Eray IC, et al. Comparison of early surgical alternatives in the management of the open abdomen: a randomised controlled study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015;21(3):168–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Long KL, Hamilton DA, Davenport DL, Bernanrd AC, Kearney PA, Chang PKA. prospective controlled evaluation of the abdominal reapproximation anchor abdominal wall closure system in combination with VAC therapy compared to VAC alone in the management of an open abdomen. Am Surg. 2014;80(6):567–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Correa JC, Meija DA, Duque N, Montoya JM, Uribe CM. Managing the open abdomen: negative pressure closure versus mesh-mediated fascial traction closure: a randomized trial. Hernia. 2016;20(2):221–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bee TK, Croce MA, Magnotti LJ, et al. Temporary abdominal closure techniques: a prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin 910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure. J Trauma. 2008;65(2):337–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bruhin A, Ferreira F, Chariker M, Smith J, Runkel N. Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in the open abdomen. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1105–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Quyn AJ, Johnston C, Hall D, et al. The open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure systems: historical evolution and systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(8):e429–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. DuBose JJ, Scalea TM, Holcomb JB, et al. Open abdominal management after damage-control laparotomy for trauma: a prospective observational American association for the surgery of trauma multicentre study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74:113–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pommerening MJ, DuBose JJ, Zielinski MD, et al. Time to first take-back operation predicts successful primary fascial closure in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy. Surgery. 2014;156:431–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bradley MJ, DuBose JJ, Scalea TM, et al. Independent predictors of enteric fistula and abdominal sepsis after damage control laparotomy: results from the prospective AAST open abdomen registry. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(10):947–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Boele van Hensbroek P, Wind J, Dijkgraaf MGW, Busch ORC, Goslings JC. Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg. 2009;33:199–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Navsaria P, Nicol A, Hudson D, Cockwill J, Smith J. Negative pressure wound therapy management of the “open abdomen” following trauma: a prospective study and systematic review. World J Emerg Surg. 2013;8:4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Cirocchi R, Birindelli A, Biffl WL, et al. What is the effectiveness of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients treated with open abdomen technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81:575–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chiara O, Cimbanassi S, Biffl W, et al. International consensus conference on open abdomen in trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80:173–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Atema JJ, Gans SL, Boermeester MA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients. World J Surg. 2015;39:912–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sharrock AE, Barker T, Yuen HM, Rickard R, Tai N. Management and closure of the open abdomen after damage control laparotomy for trauma. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2016;47:296–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Poulakidas S, Kowal-Vern A. Component separation technique for abdominal wall reconstruction in burn patients with decompressive laparotomies. J Trauma. 2009;67:1435–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Brandl A, Laimer E, Perathoner A, Zitt M, Pratschke J, Kafka-Ritsch R. Incisional hernia rate after open abdomen treatment with negative pressure and delayed primary fascia closure. Hernia. 2014;18:105–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Willms A, Schaaf S, Schwab R, et al. Abdominal wall integrity after open abdomen: long-term results of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM). Hernia. 2016;20:849–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zosa BM, Como JJ, Kelly KB, He JC, Claridge JA. Planned ventral hernia following damage control laparotomy in trauma: an added year of recovery but equal long-term outcome. Hernia. 2016;20:231–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Burlew CC, Moore EE, Cuschieri J, et al. Who should we feed? A western trauma association multi-institutional study of enteral nutrition in the open abdomen after injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:1380–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Divarci E, Karapinar B, Yalaz M, Ergun O, Celik A. Incidence and prognosis of intraabdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:503–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gutierrez IM, Gollin G. Negative pressure wound therapy for children with an open abdomen. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397:1353–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, UK

    Jeff Garner M.D., F.R.C.S.

  2. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

    Rao R. Ivatury M.D, F.A.C.S., F.C.C.M.

Authors
  1. Jeff Garner M.D., F.R.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rao R. Ivatury M.D, F.A.C.S., F.C.C.M.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

    Juan Duchesne

  2. LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

    Kenji Inaba

  3. St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom

    Mansoor Ali Khan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Garner, J., Ivatury, R.R. (2018). The Open Abdomen in Damage Control Surgery. In: Duchesne, J., Inaba, K., Khan, M. (eds) Damage Control in Trauma Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72607-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72607-6_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72606-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72607-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation