Skip to main content

Interpretation of Results from Tables, Graphs, and Regressions in Cancer Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Methods and Biostatistics in Oncology

Abstract

Tables and graphs are often used in clinical research articles. This chapter especially considers these items and addresses the way to create Tables and the ways to interpret graphs and curves in oncologic clinical research. Tables must present complete and clear access to data, and Figures should work as an enabler resource to better reveal interesting points in the article. The main tools used to identify associations between exposure and outcomes in clinical research are univariate regression and multivariate regression; here we describe the use of these methods. However, despite being widely used in cancer research, these tools are not easily interpreted, are sometimes overused, and may be associated with hidden biases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Araujo RL, Karkar AM, Allen PJ, et al. Timing of elective surgery as a perioperative outcome variable: analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16:250–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Araujo RL, Gonen M, Herman P. Chemotherapy for patients with colorectal liver metastases who underwent curative resection improves long-term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3070–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Langer B, Bleiberg H, Labianca R, Shepherd L, Nitti D, Marsoni S, et al. Fluorouracil (FU) Plus L-leucovorin (L-LV) versus observation after potentially curative resection of liver or lung metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC): results of the ENG (EORTC/NCIC CTG/GIVIO) randomized trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2002;21:149a. Abstract 592.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Portier G, Elias D, Bouche O, Rougier P, Bosset JF, Saric J, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid compared with surgery alone after resection of colorectal liver metastases: FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4976–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, Poston GJ, Schlag PM, Rougier P, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371:1007–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, Poston GJ, Schlag PM, Rougier P, et al. Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and sur gery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1208–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Adam R, Bhangui P, Poston G, Mirza D, Nuzzo G, Barroso E, et al. Is perioperative chemotherapy useful for solitary, metachronous, colorectal liver metastases? Ann Surg. 2010;252:774–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reddy SK, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA. Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy reveal disease precluding surgical treatment of initially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases? J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:55–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ihemelandu C, Levine EA, Aklilu M, Yacoub G, Howerton R, Bolemon B, et al. Optimal timing of systemic therapy in resect able colorectal liver metastases. Am Surg. 2013;79:422–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Araujo RL, Pantanali CA, Haddad L, et al. Does autologous blood transfusion during liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma increase risk of recurrence? World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8:161–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Szumilas M. Explaining odds ratios. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;19:227–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Araujo R, Gonen M, Allen P, et al. Comparison between perioperative and postoperative chemotherapy after potentially curative hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:4312–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bagley SC, White H, Golomb BA. Logistic regression in the medical literature: standards for use and reporting, with particular attention to one medical domain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:979–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1373–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahn JO, JH K. Relationship between serum prostate-specific antigen levels and body mass index in healthy younger men. Urology. 2006;68:570–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Araújo, R.L.C., Riechelmann, R.P. (2018). Interpretation of Results from Tables, Graphs, and Regressions in Cancer Research. In: Araújo, R., Riechelmann, R. (eds) Methods and Biostatistics in Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71324-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71324-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71323-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71324-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics