Abstract
The Republic of Georgia’s mix of rapid post-Soviet reform, long-standing ethnic tensions, and economic challenges made it a setting for simmering hostilities. Changes in standard operating procedures, business norms, educational guidelines, and administrative and legal practices added to the uncertainty produced by uncertain economic conditions, ethnopolitical conflict in border regions, and large numbers of internally displaced persons. Under such circumstances, conflicts were inevitable, yet the post-Soviet vacuum in social capacity for resolving conflicts had been slow to fill with resurrected Georgian customary practices or institutional mechanisms perceived as legitimate and just. Magradze and d’Estrée discuss their university partnership to enhance an MA program in Conflict Management, and develop a university-based mediation clinic, providing training for hundreds of students and citizens and mediation services for several high-profile disputes. In the course of these activities, much has been learned about devising a conflict management model that would work in a Eurasian context, as well as revising models of training and clinic administration for cultural appropriateness. Integration with existing judicial structures and practices represented larger challenges that required flexibility and innovation. This chapter reviews the challenges faced and insights gained during clinic development, and lessons learned for establishment of mediation in a hybrid legal, social, and cultural context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For example, even though modern Svans are now mostly dispersed from their original villages, young Svans recount traditional village life and practices, with the result that “these traditions are part of the idea of being Svan, even if they are not practiced any longer” (Voell et al., 2014, p. 110).
- 2.
As in several other countries, Georgians have experimented with a variant of mediation for criminal cases. Victim–offender mediation (Umbreit, Coates, & Vos, 2004) is now being gradually introduced into Georgia’s juvenile justice system.
References
Avruch, K., & Black, P. W. (1993). Conflict resolution in intercultural settings: Problems and prospects. In D. J. D. Sandole & H. van der Merwe (Eds.), Conflict resolution theory and practice (pp. 131–145). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
Babich, I. (2000). Formirovanie pravovogo pljuralizma v sovetskoe i postsovetskoe vremja na Severo-Zapadnom Kavkaze. In N. Novikova & V. Tishkov (Eds.), Juridicheskaja antropologija: Zakon i zhizn’ (pp. 116–128). Moscow: Strategy. Cited in Voell et al. 2014.
Bobrovnikov, V. (2000). Teorija i praktika pravovogo pljuralizma dlja Severnogo Kavkaza XIX–XX. In N. Novikova & V. Tishkov (Eds.), Juridicheskaja antropologija: Zakon i zhizn’ (pp. 128–141). Moscow: Strategy. Cited in Voell et al. 2014.
Despotashvili, M., & Magradze, G. (2007). Report: Community needs assessment survey. Tbilisi, Georgia: Conflict Resolution and Management Program of Tbilisi State University.
d’Estrée, T. P. (2013). Conflict resolution as a profession and the need for communities of inquiry. International Journal on Conflict Engagement and Resolution, 1, 83–95.
Di Puppo, L. (2015). Marketing reforms: The dimensions of narratives in Georgia’s fight against corruption. In S. Voell & I. Kaliszewska (Eds.), State and legal practice in the Caucasus: Anthropological perspectives on law and politics (pp. 223–242). London: Routledge.
Gegeshidze, M. (Ed.). (1975) Sakartvelos mtis zonis mosakhleobis ekonomikuri da sotsialuri aktivizztsiis sakitkhebi [Questions on Economic and Social Activities in the Georgian Mountain Zones] (Vol. 1). Tbilisi: Ivane Javakhishvilis Sakhelobis Istoriisa Etnograpiis Instituti. Cited in Jalabadze and Janiashvili (2015).
Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. New York: Doubleday.
Herzfeld, M. (1990). Pride and perjury: Time and the oath in the mountain villages of Crete. Man, 25(2), 305–322.
Hobsbawm, E. (1983). Introduction. In E. Hobsbawm & T. Ranger (Eds.), The invention of tradition (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jalabadze, N., & Janiashvili, L. (2015). Traditional law and blood feud: Svan legal practice in Soviet times and in contemporary southern Georgia. In S. Voell & I. Kaliszewska (Eds.), State and legal practice in the Caucasus: Anthropological perspectives on law and politics (pp. 37–49). London: Routledge.
Kremenyuk, V. (1996). Conflict management in the former USSR and world experience. In K. Rupesinghe & V. A. Tishkov (Eds.), Ethnicity and power in the contemporary world (p. 143). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Magradze, G., & d’Estrée, T. P. (2011, July). The Tbilisi mediation clinic: Establishing a culture of mediation in Georgia. Paper presented at the International Society of Political Psychology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Merry, S. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law and Society Review, 22, 871–896.
Moore, C. W. (2003). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Umbreit, M. S., Coates, R. B., & Vos, B. (2004). Victim-offender mediation: Three decades of practice and research. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 22, 279–303.
Voell, S. (2015). Moral breakdown among the Georgian Svans: A car accident mediated between traditional and state law. In S. Voell & I. Kaliszewska (Eds.), State and legal practice in the Caucasus: Anthropological perspectives on law and politics (pp. 95–111). London: Routledge.
Voell, S., Jalabadze, N., Janiashvili, L., & Kamm, E. (2014). Identity and traditional law: Local legal conceptions in Svan villages, Georgia. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, 23(2), 98–118.
Voell, S., & Kaliszewska, I. (Eds.). (2015). State and legal practice in the Caucasus: Anthropological perspectives on law and politics. London: Routledge.
Zakharova, E. (2015). The Tbilisi ‘street’ as a legal and political phenomenon in Georgia. In S. Voell & I. Kaliszewska (Eds.), State and legal practice in the Caucasus: Anthropological perspectives on law and politics (pp. 69–81). London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Magradze, G., d’Estrée, T.P. (2018). Cultivating Mediation in Georgia: Old Traditions and Modern Developments. In: d'Estrée, T., Parsons, R. (eds) Cultural Encounters and Emergent Practices in Conflict Resolution Capacity-Building. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71102-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71102-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71101-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71102-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)