Skip to main content

“To Wander Off in Shame”: Deconstructing the Shaming and Shameful Arrest Policies of Urban Police Departments in Their Treatment of Persons with Mental Disabilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systemic Humiliation in America

Abstract

In this chapter, we will focus on the decision-making processes made “on the street” by police officers who choose to apprehend and arrest certain cohorts of persons with mental disabilities, rather than seeking other, treatment-oriented alternatives in dealing with them. There is robust valid and reliable literature demonstrating that certain methods of training programs designed for police officers—the “Memphis Model” of crisis intervention training (CIT) is the most well known—have resulted in dramatic reductions of arrests for “nuisance crimes” and have avoided contributing to the overincarceration of this population. Yet, these approaches are far from widespread, so far appearing in only a handful of cities with any consistency, and, as a result, populations of persons with mental disabilities in urban jails like Riker’s Island continue to skyrocket. The means by which these arrests are effectuated reveal a consistent strategic deployment of humiliation as a means of controlling this stigmatized cohort of the population. The shaming nature of these encounters and arrests often leave already-vulnerable individuals feeling unheard and potentially traumatized. We will examine these issues through the filter of therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ), a new modality of solving a full range of seemingly intractable social problems. TJ teaches us that voice, validation, and voluntariness—and embracing an “ethic of care”—are central to any efforts to remediate the sort of issues we discuss here.

Our thanks to Daniel Rothbart for his insightful and helpful comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For examples of shaming sanctions, see Perlin and Weinstein (2014, pp. 20–21) (citations omitted):

    1. 1.

      A warning sign placed on the front door of a child molester’s home following his release from jail, reading “No children under the age of [eighteen] allowed on these premises by court order.”

    2. 2.

      A witness who committed perjury in court being ordered to wear a sign in front of the courthouse which read: “I lied in court. Tell the truth or walk with me.”

    3. 3.

      A convicted thief being ordered to place an ad at least four inches in height and bearing the felon’s photograph in the newspaper following his release from prison reading: “I am a convicted thief.”

    4. 4.

      Convicted drunk drivers being ordered “to wear pink hats during their performance of community service projects or to affix bumper stickers to their vehicles warning others of their crime.”

    5. 5.

      Prison inmates who expose themselves in the presence of female guards being forced to wear pink uniforms.

    6. 6.

      A burglary victim being allowed to take something of like value out of the burglar’s home.

    7. 7.

      A convicted purse snatcher being forced to wear tap shoes while out in public.

References

  • Acquaviva, G.L. 2006. Mental Health Courts: No Longer Experimental. Seton Hall Law Review 36: 971–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagenstos, S.R. 2012. The Past and Future of Deinstitutionalization Litigation. Cardozo Law Review 34: 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, A. 1997. Treating Sexual Harassment with Respect. Harvard Law Review 111: 445–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, S. 2012. “No Contact” Parole Restrictions: Unconstitutional and Counterproductive. Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 18: 485–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookbanks, W. 2001. Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Conceiving an Ethical Framework. Journal of Law and Medicine 8: 328–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, M.T., et al. 2006. Crisis Intervention Team Training: Changes in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Stigma Related to Schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services 57: 1199–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. The Police-Based Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Model: II. Effects on Level of Force and Resolution, Referral, and Arrest. Psychiatric Services 65 (4): 523–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, V.G., A.M. Mclearen, and P.A. Zapf. 2004. Dispositional Decisions with the Mentally Ill: Police Perceptions and Characteristics. Police Quarterly 7: 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, L. 2012. Can Shame Be Therapeutic? Arizona Summit Law Review 7: 539–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cucolo, H.E., and M.L. Perlin. 2017. Promoting Dignity and Preventing Shame and Humiliation by Improving the Quality and Education of Attorneys in Sexually Violent Predator (SVP) Civil Commitment Cases. Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy. (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deane, M.W., et al. 1999. Emerging Partnerships Between Mental Health and Law Enforcement. Psychiatric Services 50: 99–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBoise v. Taser Intern., Inc., 760 F.3d 892 (8th Cir. 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dylan, B. 1967. I am a Lonesome Hobo. Accessible at http://bobdylan.com/songs/i-am-lonesome-hobo/

  • Fisk, C.L. 2001. Humiliation at Work. William and Mary Journal of Women & Law 8: 73–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, G. 2003. Thinking About Eden: A Tribute to Herbert Morris. QLR 22: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd v. City of New York, 959 F. Supp. 2d 540 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fradella, H.F., and R. Smith-Casey. 2014. Criminal Justice Responses to the Mentally Ill. In Criminal Justice Policy, ed. S.A. Mallicoat and C. Gardiner, 201–224. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garczynski v. Bradshaw, 573 F.3d 1158 (11th Cir. 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T.M. 1997. Police as Frontline Mental Health Workers: The Decision to Arrest or Refer to Mental Health Agencies. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 20: 469–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., and P.S. Appelbaum. 1995. The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. III: Abilities of Patients to Consent to Psychiatric and Medical Treatments. Law and Human Behavior 19: 149–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartling, L.M., and T. Luchetta. 1999. Humiliation: Assessing the Impact of Derision, Degradation, and Debasement. Journal of Primary Prevention 19: 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • http://www.humiliationstudies.org

  • http://www.thearc.org/document.doc?id=4925

  • http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-6212-why_did_james_chasse_jr_die.ht

  • http://www1.nyc.gov/assets/criminaljustice/downloads/pdf/annual-report-complete.pdf

  • Katz, J. 2014. Elements of Shame. In The Widening Scope of Shame, ed. M.R. Lansky and A.P. Morrison, 231–260. New York City: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D.C. 1991. The Humiliation Dynamic: An Overview. Journal of Primary Prevention 12: 93–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, L. 2004. Advocacy of the Establishment of Mental Health Specialty Courts in the Provision of Therapeutic Justice for Mentally Ill Offenders. American Journal of Criminal Law 28: 255–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazare, A., and W.S. Sogg. 2001. Shame, Humiliation and Stigma in the Attorney-Client Relationship. Practical Lawyer 47 (4): 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leasure, S.L. 2012. Criminal Law—Teenage Sexting in Arkansas: How Special Legislation Addressing Sexting Behavior in Minors Can Salvage Arkansas’s Teens’ Futures. University of Arkansas Little Rock Law Review 35: 141–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, A.J., and M.L. Perlin. 2017. “Life’s Hurried Tangled Road”: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Analysis of Why Dedicated Counsel Must Be Assigned to Represent Persons with Mental Disabilities in Community Settings. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 35: 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, T.M. 1991. Shame, Culture, and American Criminal Law. Michigan Law Review 89: 1880–1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. The Meanings of Shame Implications for Legal Reform. Psychology, Public Policy and Law 3: 645–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Show (Some) Emotions. In The Pasions of the Law, ed. S. Bandes, 80–122. New York City: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza v City of Rome, 872 F. Supp. 1110 (N.D.N.Y. 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E.J. 2004. Embracing Addiction: Drug Courts and the False Promise of Judicial Interventionism. Ohio State Law Journal. 65: 1479–1576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W.I. 1993. Humiliation & Other Essays on Honor, Social Discomfort, & Violence. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S., et al. 2012. Crisis Intervention for People with Severe Mental Illnesses. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 5. Accessible at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4204394/

  • Netter, B. 2005. Avoiding the Shameful Backlash: Social Repercussions for the Increased Use of Alternative Sanctions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 96: 187–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C. 2004. Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzarella, R., and J.O. Alicea. 1997. Police Tactics in Incidents with Mentally Disturbed Persons. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 20: 326–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlin, M.L. 2008. “Everybody Is Making Love/Or Else Expecting Rain”: Considering the Sexual Autonomy Rights of Persons Institutionalized Because of Mental Disability in Forensic Hospitals and in Asia. Washington Law Review 83: 481–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. “His Brain Has Been Mismanaged with Great Skill”: How Will Jurors Respond to Neuroimaging Testimony in Insanity Defense Cases? Akron Law Review 42: 885–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013a. A Prescription for Dignity: Rethinking Criminal Justice and Mental Disability Law. Burlington: Ashgate Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. “There Are No Trials Inside the Gates of Eden”: Mental Health Courts, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Dignity, and the Promise of Therapeutic Jurisprudence. In Coercive Care: Law and Policy, ed. B. McSherry and I. Freckelton, 193–217. New York City: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013c. “Wisdom Is Thrown into Jail”: Using Therapeutic Jurisprudence to Remediate the Criminalization of Persons with Mental Illness. Michigan State University Journal of Medicine and Law 17: 343–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. “God Said to Abraham/Kill Me a Son”: Why the Insanity Defense and the Incompetency Status Are Compatible with and Required by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Basic Principles of Therapeutic Jurisprudence. American Criminal Law Review 54: 477–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlin, M.L., and A.J. Lynch. 2015. How Teaching About Therapeutic Jurisprudence Can Be a Tool of Social Justice, and Lead Law Students to Personally and Socially Rewarding Careers: Sexuality and Disability as a Case Example. Nevada, Law Journal 16: 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016a. “Had to Be Held Down by Big Police”: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Perspective on Interactions Between Police and Persons with Mental Disabilities. Fordham Urban Law Journal 43: 685–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016b. “In the Wasteland of Your Mind”: Criminology, Scientific Discoveries and the Criminal Process. Virginia Journal of Criminal Law 4: 304–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016c. “Mr. Bad Example”: Why Lawyers Need to Embrace Therapeutic Jurisprudence to Root Out Sanism in the Representation of Persons with Mental Disabilities. Wyoming Law Review 16: 299–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlin, M.L., and H.E. Cucolo. 2017. “Tolling for the Aching Ones Whose Wounds Cannot Be Nursed”: The Marginalization of Racial Minorities and Women in Institutional Mental Disability Law. Journal of Gender, Race & Justice 20: 431–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlin, M.L., and J. Douard. 2008–09. “Equality, I Spoke That Word/As If a Wedding Vow”: Mental Disability Law and How We Treat Marginalized Persons. New York Law School Law Review 53: 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlin, M.L., and N.M. Weinstein. 2014. “Friend to the Martyr, a Friend to the Woman of Shame”: Thinking About the Law, Shame and Humiliation. Southern California Review of Law & Social Justice 24: 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016–2017. “Said I, ‘But You Have No Choice’”: Why a Lawyer Must Ethically Honor a Client’s Decision About Mental Health Treatment Even If It Is Not What S/He Would Have Chosen. Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Law Journal 15: 73–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschel v. City of Missoula, 686 F. Supp. 2d 1092 (D. Mont. 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronner, A.D. 2002. Songs of Validation, Voice, and Voluntary Participation: Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Miranda and Juveniles. University of Cincinnati Law Review 71: 79–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Learned-Helpless Lawyer: Clinical Legal Education and Therapeutic Jurisprudence as Antidotes to the Bartleby Syndrome. Touro Law Review 24: 601–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, C. 2009. Decisional Dignity: Teenage Abortion, Bypass Hearings, and the Misuse of Law. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 18: 409–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheff, T.J. 1998. Community Conferences: Shame and Anger in Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Revista Juridica U.P.R. 67: 97–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C.D. 1977. Shame, Exposure and Privacy. New York City: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnittker, J., M. Massoglia, and C. Uggen. 2012. Out and Down: Incarceration and Psychiatric Disorders. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 53: 448–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schug, R.A., and H.F. Fradella. 2015. Mental Illness and Crime. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. 2012. What Police Learn from Lawsuits. Cardozo Law Review 33: 841–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, H.J., et al. 2000. Comparing Outcomes of Major Models of Police Responses to Mental Health Emergencies. Psychiatric Services 51: 645–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, R., et al. 2013. Moral Emotions and Offending: Do Feelings of Anticipated Shame and Guilt Mediate the Effect of Socialization on Offending? European Journal of Criminology 10: 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teller, J.L., M.R. Munetz, K.M. Gil, and C. Ritter. 2006. Crisis Intervention Team Training for Police Officers Responding to Mental Disturbance Calls. Psychiatric Services 57: 232–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrey, E.F. 1995. Jails and Prisons–America’s New Mental Hospitals. American Journal of Public Health 85 (12): 1611–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tortu v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep’t, 556 F. 3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trager, O. 2004. Keys to the Rain: The Definitive Bob Dylan Encyclopedia. New York City: Billboard Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, L.A. 2009. Sex Offender Residency Restrictions: How Common Sense Places Children at Risk. Drexel Law Review 1: 175–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics and the Ethics of Queer Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington v. Lambert, 98 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir.1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Amy C., and Anjali J. Fulambarker. 2012. The Crisis Intervention Team Model of Police Response to Mental Health Crises. Best Practices in Mental Health 8 (2): 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, D.B. 1990. Therapeutic Jurisprudence: The Law as a Therapeutic Agent. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Changing Concepts of Legal Scholarship. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 11: 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Practicing Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Psycholegal Soft Spots and Strategies. In Practicing Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Law as a Helping Profession, ed. Daniel P. Stolle et al., vol. 45. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winick, B.J. 2003. A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Model for Civil Commitment. In Involuntary Detention and Therapeutic Jurisprudence: International Perspective on Civil Commitment, ed. Kate Diesfeld and Ian Freckelton, 2–54. Farnham: Ashgate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Foreword: Therapeutic Jurisprudence Perspectives on Dealing with Victims of Crime. Nova Law Review 33: 535–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winick, B.J., and D.B. Wexler. 2006. The Use of Therapeutic Jurisprudence in Law School Clinical Education: Transforming the Criminal Law Clinic. Clinical Law Review 13: 605–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurmser, L. 1981. The Mask of Shame. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziel, P. 2005. Eighteenth Century Public Humiliation Penalties in Twenty-First Century America: The “Shameful” Return of “Scarlet Letter” Punishments in U.S. v. Gementera. BYU. Journal of Public Law 19: 499–522.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Perlin, M.L., Lynch, A.J. (2018). “To Wander Off in Shame”: Deconstructing the Shaming and Shameful Arrest Policies of Urban Police Departments in Their Treatment of Persons with Mental Disabilities. In: Rothbart, D. (eds) Systemic Humiliation in America. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70679-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70679-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70678-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70679-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics