Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why a Feminist Standpoint Epistemology Is Necessary in Times of Hegemonic Masculinity: Thoughts on Intersectionality and Transrationality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transrational Resonances

Abstract

The chapter argues for a feminist political positioning and the need for space for marginal voices in times of hegemonic masculinity. The understanding of liberal feminist on equality by bringing women in does not suffice for a structural change in International Relations (IR) and conflict management. However, the expectations of essentialist feminists hoping for an inherent peacefulness of women as a dividing and shaping marker is equally proven simplistic. More is necessary, inclusion as well as a recognition of standpoints resulting from experience of those who are not the dominant subject in the respective context. Gender therefore is both, a social construct as well as an embodied reality in a masculinist world. This calls for a political standpoint epistemology, the recognition of power structures based on – as well as an ideal of overcoming – gender, race and class based categories of hegemonic dominance. Taking the approach of intersectionality as relational praxis, is not based on a model of access to experience in the formation of knowledge by any given individual. It much more calls for the acceptance of the non-accessibility of experience based on gender, race, class or sexual orientation by the respective dominant subject and the necessity of voice and existence in public and private, political and social spaces. Being an ally then becomes a political activity of support without taking the power of definition or the lead in articulation of experience. Only then can intersectional politics grow and the multitude of experience, voices and perspectives enrich the discourse – be it academic, political, spiritual or relational.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Following the debate of the new Trump administration as well as the re-nationalization attempts of European Union member states such as the Brexit.

References

  • Albrecht-Heide, Astrid. 1984. Frau Macht (macht?) Militär. In Frauen und Macht. Der alltägliche Beitrag der Frauen zur Politik des Patriarchats, ed. Barbara Schaeffer-Hegel, 293–318. Berlin: Centaurus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jacqui, and Chandra Talpade Mohanty, eds. 1997. Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, Barbara. 2016. Critical Whiteness Studies. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.5. Accessed 23 Feb 2017.

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baaz, Maria Eriksson, and Maria Stern. 2009. Why Do Soldiers Rape? Masculinity, Violence, and Sexuality in The Armed Forces in the Congo (DRC). International Studies Quarterly 53 (2): 495–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, Simone. 1974. The Second Sex. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, Seyla, Judith Butler, Drucilla Cornell, and Nancy Fraser. 1995. Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bly, Robert. 1990. Iron John: A Book About Men. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock-Utne, Birgit. 1989. Feminist Perspectives on Peace and Peace Education. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1988. Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal 40 (4): 519–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith, and Joan W. Scott, eds. 1992. Feminists Theorize the Political. New York/London: Routledge/Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Carol. 1987a. Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals. Signs 12 (4): 687–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987b. Slick’Ems, Glick ‘Ems, Christmas Trees, and Cutters: Nuclear Language and How We Learned to Pat the Bomb. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 43 (5): 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, Robert W., and James W. Messerschmidt. 2005. Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society 19 (6): 829–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, Miriam. 1993. Wo-Man, Retelling the War Myth. In Gendering War Talk, ed. Miriam Cooke and Angela Woollacott, 177–204. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amico, Francine. 1996. Feminist Perspectives on Women Warriors. Peace Review 8 (3): 379–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Mary. 1978. Gyn/Ecology. The Metaethics of Radical Feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Wolfgang. 2006. A Call for Trans-Rational Peaces. Virtual Peace Library of the UNESCO Chair for Peace Studies. https://www.uibk.ac.at/peacestudies/downloads/peacelibrary/transrational.pdf. Accessed 17 Feb 2006.

  • Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1987. Women and War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, Cynthia. 1983. Does Khaki Become You?: The Militarization of Women’s Lives. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Women and Children: Making Feminist Sense of the Persian Gulf Crisis. The Village Voice, September 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, Betty. 1963. The Feminist mystique. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Emma. 1923. My Disillusionment in Russia. New York: Doubleday, Page & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1924. My Further Disillusionment in Russia. New York: Doubleday, Page & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göttner-Abendroth, Heide. 1980. Die Göttin und ihr Heros. Die matriarchalen Religionen in Mythen, Märchen, Dichtung. München: Frauenoffensive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Rebecca, and Kathleen Newland, eds. 1991. Gender and International Relations. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Heidi. 1981. The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union. In Women and Revolution, ed. Lydia Sargent, 1–42. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, Cressida J. 2000. Line Drawings: Defining Women Through Feminist Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, bell. 1981. Ain’t I a woman? New York: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Feminist Theory from Margin to Center. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson, Eva, ed. 1988. Women and the Military System. New York/London: Harvester; Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Suad, ed. 2000. Gender and Citizenship in the Middle East. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Carl Gustav. 1991. The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Laura. 1994. Women as Nurturer: An Archetype that Supports Patriarchal Militarism. Hypatia 9 (2): 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollontai, Alexandra. 1978 [1909]. The Social Basis of the Woman Question. In Selected Writings of Alexandra Kollontai. Westport: Lawrence Hill and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1971 [1919]. Women Workers Struggle for Their Rights. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, Cheryl. 1997. Suffrage and Power: The Women’s Movement 1918–1928. London: IB Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Ann Russo, and Lourdes Torres, eds. 1991. Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounk, Yasha. 2016. Yes, American Democracy Could Break Down. Politico Magazine, October 22. http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/trump-american-democracy-could-break-down-214383.

  • Paffenholz, Thania, Nick Ross, Steven Dixon, Anna-Lena Schluchter, and Jacqui True. 2016. Making Women Count – Not Just Counting Women: Assessing Women’s Inclusion and Influence on Peace Negotiations. Geneva: Inclusive Peace and Transition Initiative and UN Women. http://www.inclusivepeace.org/sites/default/files/IPTI-UN-Women-Report-Making-Women-Count-60-Pages.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2017.

  • Pateman, Carol. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, Margaret. 1994. Sandino’s Daughters Revisited. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, Betty. 1985. Sexism and the War System. New York/London: Teachers College; Columbiea University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, Ruth. 1992. Männlichkeitskonstruktionen: Die diskursive Macht des Militärs. Das Argument 34 (196): 859–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanley, Mary Lyndon, and Carole Pateman, eds. 1991. Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory. University Park: The Pennsylvanian State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, Vandana. 1992. The Seed and the Earth: Women, Ecology and Biotechnology. The Ecologist 22 (1): 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Ecofeminism, Kali for Women. New Delhi/London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, Laura, and Caron E. Gentry. 2007. Mothers, Monsters, Whores: Women’s Violence in Global Politics. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1996. In The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of Gayati Chakravorty Spivak, ed. Donna Landry and Gerald MacLean. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauton, Irene. 1990. Mothers of the Revolution: The War Experience of Thirty Zimbabwean Women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, Guido, and Annette Weber, eds. 2015. Jihadismus in Afrika: Lokale Ursachen, Regionale Ausbreitung, Internationale Verbindungen. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Suttner, Bertha. 1892. Lay Down Your Arms: The Autobiography of Martha Von Tilling. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theweleit, Klaus. 1993. The Bomb’s Womb and the Genders of War (War Goes on Preventing Women from Becoming the Mothers of Invention). In Gendering War Talk, ed. Miriam Cooke and Angela Woollacott, 177–204. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thürmer-Rohr, Christina, ed. 1990. Mittäterschaft und Entdeckungslust. Berlin: Orlanda Frauenverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, Anne. 1991. Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. In Gender and International Relations, ed. Rebecca Grant and Kathleen Newland, 27–40. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Gender in International Relations. Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turshen, Meredeth, and Clotilde Twagiramariya, eds. 1989. What Women Do in Wartime: Gender and Conflict in Africa. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urdang, Stephanie. 1989. And Still They Dance. Women, War and the Struggle for Change in Mozambique. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Security Council, Security Council Resolution 1325. 2000. On Women and Peace and Security. http://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f4672e.html. Accessed 5 July 2017.

  • Weber, Annette. 2007. Barbarian Beasts or Mothers of Invention? Relation of Gendered Fighter and Citizen Images, with a Specific Case Study on Southern Sudan. PhD Dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Women Without Arms: Gendered Fighter Constructions in Eritrea and Southern Sudan. International Journal of Conflict and Violence 5 (2): 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, Ken. 1995. Sex, Ecology, Spirituality, Vol 1: The Spirit of Evolution. Boston: Shambhala Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Integral spirituality. Boston: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Amrit. 1991. The Challenge Road: Women and the Eritrean Revolution. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, Charlotte. 1995. Anti-essentialism in Feminist Theory. Philosophical Topics 23 (2): 321–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, Virginia. 1938. Three Guineas. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1999. The ‘Multi-Layered Citizen. International Feminist Journal of Politics 1 (1): 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zetkin, Clara. 1895. On a Bourgeois Feminist Petition. Marxist Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/draper/1976/women/3-zetkin.html. Accessed 23 Feb 2017.

  • ———. 1920. Lenin on the Women’s Question. Marxist Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/zetkin/1920/lenin/zetkin1.htm. Accessed 23 Feb 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Middle East and Africa Division, German Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin, Germany

    Annette Weber

Authors
  1. Annette Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Unit for Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Josefina Echavarría Alvarez

  2. Unit for Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Daniela Ingruber

  3. Unit for Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Norbert Koppensteiner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Weber, A. (2018). Why a Feminist Standpoint Epistemology Is Necessary in Times of Hegemonic Masculinity: Thoughts on Intersectionality and Transrationality. In: Echavarría Alvarez, J., Ingruber, D., Koppensteiner, N. (eds) Transrational Resonances . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70616-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation