Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ubuntu and the Communication–Power Nexus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Media and Communication Research in Africa

Abstract

Against the backdrop of a global refugee crisis, an ever-increasing gap between rich and poor and dismal environmental forecasts, the headlines that dominate contemporary news reports are often characterized by division and polarization, as “fear”, “conspiracy” and “paranoia” (see Munusamy, 2017, n.p.) beset the public. “The problem”, some say, “is no longer simply paralyzing partisanship. The danger at the moment is … a kind of tribalism”, and such divides aren’t simply between left and right: “Instead, there are schisms within the parties, and in some cases schisms within schisms” (Seib, 2017, n.p.). These divisive tendencies are in some ways reflected and amplified by the media who, in turn, reduce what are essentially complex interrelated issues into over-simplified frames that boost ratings and make the consumption of information easier. Political debates, talk shows and many other forms of public discourse, even those that resist a commercial focus in favour of an ethos of public journalism, are frequently characterized by agonistic modes of communication that posit and challenge, persuade and argue, betraying deeply conflictual assumptions around the way in which we perceive human relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amos, V., & Parmar, P. (1984). Challenging imperial feminism. Feminist Review, 17(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1969). On violence. San Diego, CA: Harvest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenberg, N. (1999). In search of real freedom: Ubuntu and the media. Critical Arts, 12(2), 42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. E. (1990). Three faces of power. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1994). Structures, habitus, power: Basis for a theory of symbolic power. In N. B. Dirks, G. Eley, & S. B. Orthner (Eds.), Culture, power, history: A reader in contemporary social theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocke-Utne, B. (1989). Feminist perspectives on peace and peace education. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasi, C. (2014a). Violent communication is not alien to Ubuntu: Nothing human is alien to Africans. Communication: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 40(4), 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasi, C. (2014b). Ubuntu and freedom of expression. Ethics & Behavior, 24(6), 495–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christians, C. G. (2004). Ubuntu and communitarianism in media ethics. Ecquid Novi, 25(2), 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. (1974). The terms of political discourse. Lexington, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (2015). On intersectionality: The essential writings of Kimberle Crenshaw. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, P., & Sparks, C. (1992). Journalism and popular culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding, K. (1996). Power. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., & Seloane, M. (1998). Introduction. In J. Duncan & M. Seloane (Eds.), Media and democracy in South Africa (pp. 1–53). Pretoria: HSRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ess, C. (2013). Digital media ethics. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filson, G. (1992). Cooperative inquiry as a theory of practice: Contributions of John Dewey and Jurgen Habermas (Doctoral Dissertation). Toronto: University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourie, P. (2011). Normative media theory in a changed media landscape and globalized society. In N. Hyde-Clarke (Ed.), Communication and media ethics in South Africa (pp. 25–45). Cape Town: Juta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. (1968). Power and discontent. Homewood: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschlager, A. (1982). Towards a semiotics of authoritarian discourse. Poetics Today, 3(1), 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1962). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Boston, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, N. (1983). Money, sex and power: Towards a feminist historical materialism. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1968). Leviathan. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlberg, M. (2002). Partisan branding and media spectacle: Implications for democratic communication. Democratic Communique, 18, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlberg, M. (2004). Beyond the culture of contest. Oxford: George Ronald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlberg, M. (2005). The power of discourse and the discourse of power: Pursuing peace through discourse intervention. International Journal of Peace Studies, 10(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, A. (1984). Age, race, class and sex: Women redefining difference. Berkeley, CA: Crossing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw, D. J. (2001). Ubuntu and the challenge of multiculturalism in post-apartheid South Africa. Unitwin Student Network. Retrieved November 4, 2014, from http://www.phys.uu.nl/unitwin/

  • Louw, D. J. (2010, January). Power sharing and the challenge of ubuntu ethics. Paper presented at the Forum for Religious Dialogue Symposium of the Research Institute for Theology and Religion at the University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1986). Power. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1961). The Prince. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, C. B. (1973). Democratic theory: Essays in retrieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1967). The German ideology. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T. (2011). Ubuntu as a moral theory and human rights in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal, 11(1), 532–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T. (2014). Harmonizing global ethics in the future: A proposal to add South and East to West. Journal of Global Ethics, 10(2), 146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T. (2015). African ethics and journalism ethics: News and opinion in light of Ubuntu. Journal of Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 30(2), 74–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T., & Gaie, J. (2010). The African ethic of Ubuntu/Botho: Implications for research on morality. Journal of Moral Education, 39(1), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1982). Colloquium: Women and power. Stone Center for Developmental Services and Studies, 82(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkhize, N. (2008). Ubuntu and harmony: An African approach to morality and ethics. In R. Nicolson (Ed.), Persons in community: African ethics in a global culture (pp. 35–44). Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnyaka, M., & Motlhabi, M. (2005). The African concept of Ubuntu/Botho and its socio-moral significance. Black Theology, 3(1), 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mnyaka, M., & Motlhabi, M. (2009). Ubuntu and its socio-moral significance. In M. F. Murove (Ed.), African ethics: An anthology of comparative and applied ethics (pp. 63–84). Pietermaritzburg: University of Kwazulu Natal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, J. (1983). A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method. In S. Harding & M. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munusamy, R. (2017). South Africa’s explosive political cocktail. The Daily Maverick. Retrieved April 19, 2017, from https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2017-04-19-south-africas-explosive-political-cocktail-fear-loathing-conspiracy-paranoia/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=First%20Thing%2019th%20April&utm_content=First%20Thing%2019th%20April+CID_840d196c09fad5282cbf8cc3738bad1f&utm_source=TouchBasePro&utm_term=South%20Africas%20explosive%20political%20cocktail%20Fear%20Loathing%20Conspiracy%20Paranoia#.WPbUZtJ9600.

  • Mupotsa, D. (2015, October 7). Interview with author. Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, P. (1990). The politics of articulation in identity: Community, culture, difference. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, S., & Wasserman, H. (2007). Global media ethics revisited: A postcolonial critique. Global Media and Communication, 3(1), 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodny-Gumede, Y. (2015a). An assessment of the public interest and ideas of the public in South Africa and the adoption of Ubuntu journalism. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 30(2), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodny-Gumede, Y. (2015b). Coverage of Marikana: War and conflict and the case for peace (journalism). Social Dynamics, 41(2), 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shutte, A. (1993). Philosophy for Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seib, G. F. (2017). A new tribalism spreads in Donald Trump’s Washington. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved April 3, 2017, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-new-tribalism-spreads-in-donald-trumps-washington-1491229525

  • Tannen, D. (1998). The argument culture. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavernaro-Haidarian, L. (2017). Talking Ubuntu: Toward a relational talk show model (Doctoral Thesis). Johannesburg: The University of Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomaselli, K. G. (2011). (Afri)ethics, communitarianism and the public sphere. In N. Hyde-Clarke (Ed.), Communication and media ethics in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompkins, J. (1988). Fighting words: Unlearning to write the critical essay. The Georgia Review, 42, 585–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hensbroek, B. (1999). Political discourses in African thought: 1960 to the present. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg, T. E. (1990). The forms of power: From domination to transformation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, H. (2013). Journalism in a new democracy: The ethics of listening. Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 39(1), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1986). Domination by economic power and by authority. In S. Lukes (Ed.), Power. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimann, G. (2000). Communicating unreality: Modern media and the reconstruction of reality. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiredu, K. (1996). Cultural universals and particulars: An African perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrong, D. H. (1968). Some problems in defining social power. American Journal of Sociology, 73(6), 673–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GES Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Leyla Tavernaro-Haidarian

Authors
  1. Leyla Tavernaro-Haidarian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    Bruce Mutsvairo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tavernaro-Haidarian, L. (2018). Ubuntu and the Communication–Power Nexus. In: Mutsvairo, B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Media and Communication Research in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70443-2_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation