Skip to main content

Comparative Media Studies in Africa: Challenges and Paradoxes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Drawing on previous work on the role of the media in the democratization processes of the Lusophone African countries (Angola, Cape Verde, Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique, and São Tomé and Príncipe), this chapter addresses the challenges and paradoxes of conducting comparative research focused on contexts where there are constraints to democratic development (although at different levels and gradation), and on which reliable information on key indicators is often missing. These are societies with different cultural expectations of democracy and political leadership, which do not fit neatly into most Western world conceptualizations. The research looked into the news media functions in democratization contexts and the role that different types of media, including new media technologies, have in creating and supporting the necessary conditions of democracy and in shaping the type of democracy that is actually being built. Finally, by examining the relation between media and politics and the dynamics of media, political, and social change, the research outlines the most important media uses and effects in these democratization contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berger, G. (2007). Media legislation in Africa: A comparative legal survey. Rhodes University, Grahamstown: UNESCO. isbn:9780868104423. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001570/157072e.pdf

  • Bratton, M., & van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic experiments in Africa: Regime transitions in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chabal, P., & Daloz, J.-P. (1999). Africa works: Disorder as political instrument. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (2000). On democracy. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes: Elections without democracy. Journal of Democracy., 13(2), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (2008). The spirit of democracy: The struggle to build free societies throughout the world. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doig, A., & Theobald, R. (Eds.). (2003). Corruption and democratisation. London and Portland, OR: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F. (2013). The emerging paradigm of comparative communication enquiry: Advancing cross-national research in times of globalization. International Journal of Communication, 7, 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F., & Hanitzsch, T. (2012). On the why and how of comparative inquiry in communication studies. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 3–24). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, S. E. (1970). Comparative government. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch, M., & Blumler, J. (1990). Political communication systems and democratic values. In J. Lichtenberg (Ed.), Democracy and the mass media (pp. 24–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2012). Comparing media systems beyond the western world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, J. (2000). States and power in Africa: Comparative lessons in authority and control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyden, G. (2006). African politics in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, S. I. (2006). Democracy and elections in Africa. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. The American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1994). The social requisites of democracy revisited. American Sociological Review, 59(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, P., & Hallin, D. (2012). Some caveats about comparative research in media studies. In H. Semetko & M. Scammell (Eds.), The Sage handbook of political communication (pp. 509–517). London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, W., & Croissant, A. (2004). Conclusion: Good and defective democracies. Democratization, 11(5), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, L. (2004). What is ‘good’ democracy? Democratization, 11(5), 10–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, L. (2008). Hybrid regimes or regimes in transition? (Working Paper 70). Madrid: Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior (FRIDE). Retrieved December 14, 2011, from http://www.fride.org/download/WP70-Hybrid_28regimes_ENG_sep08.pdf

  • Pitcher, A., Moran, M., & Johnston, M. (2009). Rethinking patrimonialism and neopatrimonialism in Africa. African Studies Review, 52(1), 125–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado, S. (2012). The web in African countries. Exploring the possible influences of the Internet in the democratization processes. Information, Communication & Society, 15(9), 1373–1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.647044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado, S. (2014). The internet and democracy building in Lusophone African countries. London; New York: Routledge; Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgado, S. (2017). Histories of the Internet and political communication in Lusophone Africa. In G. Goggin & M. McLelland (Eds.), The Routledge companion to global internet histories (pp. 490–504). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J. A. (1990). Democracy in Black Africa: Survival and revival. New York: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J. A. (1996). The new struggle for democracy in Africa. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Salgado, S. (2018). Comparative Media Studies in Africa: Challenges and Paradoxes. In: Mutsvairo, B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Media and Communication Research in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70443-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics