Skip to main content

Marx’s Critical Notes on the Classical Theory of Interest

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Unfinished System of Karl Marx

Part of the book series: Luxemburg International Studies in Political Economy ((LISPE))

Abstract

This contribution summarises the critical notes on the theory of interest provided by Marx in Volume III of his Theories of Surplus Value and, subsequently, in Volume III of Capital. The discussion in Theories of Surplus Value established industrial capitalist finance as distinct from the usury of mercantile capitalism, with industrial finance organised around interest-bearing capital. Volume III of Capital reveals that Marx also absorbed from Mill and Tooke some criticism of the classical, Ricardian, theory of interest, according to which the rate of interest is determined by the rate of profit. This led him to conclude that the average or long-term rate of interest is more important for modern capitalism than any current money rate of interest, and that monetary innovation leads to growing concentration of money capital, producing downward pressure on the rate of interest. Finally, Marx emphasised the two aspects of the capitalist as owner of money and as a ‘functioning’ capitalist producing goods. This suggests a purely monetary circulation of interest among capitalists, marking the final emancipation of interest from real factors such as the rate of profit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the twentieth century, Keynes and Kalecki argued that this long-term rate of interest was relevant to business investment.

  2. 2.

    Neglecting the distinction between capitalist credit and debt and pre-capitalist debt, and the income and balance sheet implications of that distinction, confuses long-term (econometric) studies of debt, such as Reinhart and Rogoff (2008).

  3. 3.

    ‘We have spoken of bankers and financiers as the makers of credit. But we have also recognized that the chief financial material out of which they make it is the stocks and shares and other certificates of value which represents the capital created by the saving and investing classes. It is thus the growth of the forms of saving which take these financial shapes that enables the increased credit to emerge from the financial factories. All such modern saving can furnish material for the creation of more credit ’ (Hobson 1924, p. 89).

  4. 4.

    ‘The rate of interest paid on deposits is always somewhat lower than the rate charged by banks on loans. The difference between these two rates remunerates the bank’ (Wicksell 1899, p. 139).

  5. 5.

    The theory may be summarised as follows: in a closed economy with no government, in a given period total income (Y) is equal to the sum of profits plus wages (W + P), which in turn is equal to Consumption plus Investment (C + I). Y – C = I = Saving. Saving may be divided into the saving of workers (Sw) and the saving of capitalists (Sc). Similarly, Consumption may be divided into the consumption of workers (Cw) and the consumption of capitalists (Cc).

    Profits are therefore equal to Sc + Cc. Sc is equal to total Saving or Investment minus Sw (I – Sw). Total Profits (Sc + Cc) are therefore equal to I + Cc – Sw. See Kalecki (1942). It is easy to show that, in the more complicated situation where banks earn money from intermediary household or workers’ deposits and loans, bank profits have no impact on aggregate profits.

  6. 6.

    Kiyotaki and Moore (1997) present a model of credit cycles in which the only collateral is real or productive capital. Such a credit cycle, of course, then follows the investment cycle. The much more convenient and widespread use of financial assets as collateral extends the range and possibilities of the credit cycle far beyond the less financialised investment cycle.

  7. 7.

    The process by which this happens in described in Toporowski (2015). Wicksell , who concedes that capitalists hold bank deposits (Wicksell 1899, pp. 138–139), does not draw the logical conclusion that those capitalists also receive interest on those deposits in addition to their income from production and trade.

References

  • Barbon, N. (1690). A Discourse of Trade. London: Milbourn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1981). ‘Preface’ in Marx (1981). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilferding, R. [1910] (1981). Finance Capital a Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. A. (1924). Gold Prices and Wages with an Examination of the Quantity Theory. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, M. (1933). An Essay on the Business Cycle Theory. In J. Osiatyński (Ed.), The Collected Works of Michał Kalecki Volume I Capitalism: Business Cycles and Full Employment. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, M. (1941). The Short-Term Rate of Interest and the Velocity of Cash Circulation. Review of Economic Studies, 2, 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, M. (1942). A Theory of Profits. Economic Journal, 52(2), 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, M. (1971). Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy 1933–1970. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyotaki, N., & Moore, J. (1997). Credit Cycles. Journal of Political Economy, 105(2), 211–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1971). Theories of Surplus Value Part III. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1885] (1978). Capital, Volume II. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1894] (1981). Capital, Volume III. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebyl, K. (1946). Studies in the Classical Theories of Money. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2008). This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. In P. Sraffa & M. Dobb (Eds.), The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. H. [1928] (1940). Theories of Banking Policy. In Essays in Monetary Theory. London: P.S. King.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2011). Thomas Tooke and the Monetary Thought of Classical Economics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toporowski, J. (2015, August). A Kalecki Fable on Debt and the Monetary Transmission Mechanism. London School of Economics, Financial Markets Group Special Paper No. 239. ISSN 1359-9151-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, K. [1899] (1936). Interest and Prices a Study of the Causes Regulating the Value of Money (R. F. Kahn, Trans.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers, H. (1909). The Meaning of Money. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This chapter emerged out of discussions with Anwar Shaikh and Riccardo Bellofiore, neither of whom are responsible for any remaining errors contained within.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Toporowski, J. (2018). Marx’s Critical Notes on the Classical Theory of Interest. In: Dellheim, J., Wolf, F. (eds) The Unfinished System of Karl Marx. Luxemburg International Studies in Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70347-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70347-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70346-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70347-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics