Abstract
The construction of complex objects, such as an aircraft, requires the creation of a dedicated industrial system. By industrial system, we mean all the material and immaterial means used to manufacture the object (labour, machines, factories, etc.). Classically, the industrial system is specified when the aircraft design is already engaged. In other words, the specifications of the product are the requirements of the industrial system. This approach presents two major drawbacks: firstly, the industrial system can inherit blocking constraints that could be easily removed by changing the aircraft design, and secondly, both continue to evolve during the lifetime of the aircraft programme. In this paper, we address the problem of having a global view of design and manufacturing. Starting from an industrial case study, the Airbus A320 aircraft manufacturing, we proposed a model-based approach, firsts steps towards tools for specifying together and consistently the design of an aircraft and its manufacturing system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
- 1.
By industrial system we mean all the material and non-material means used to construct an aircraft (labour, machines, factories, methods, tools, etc.).
References
Batarseh, O., McGinnis, L.F.: Sysml to discrete-event simulation to analyze electronic assembly systems. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on Theory of Modeling and Simulation - DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium, TMS/DEVS 2012, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 48:1–48:8. Society for Computer Simulation International (2012)
Benkamoun, N., ElMaraghy, W., Huyet, A.L., Kouiss, K.: Architecture framework for manufacturing system design. Procedia CIRP 17, 88–93 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.101
Bruno, G., Antonelli, D., Villa, A.: A reference ontology to support product lifecycle management. Procedia CIRP 33, 41–46 (2015)
Delmas, R., Doose, D., Pires, A.F., Polacsek, T.: Supporting model based design. In: Bellatreche, L., Mota Pinto, F. (eds.) MEDI 2011. LNCS, vol. 6918, pp. 237–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24443-8_25
Delmas, R., Polacsek, T.: Formal methods for exchange policy specification. In: Salinesi, C., Norrie, M.C., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) CAiSE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7908, pp. 288–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38709-8_19
Demoly, F., Yan, X., Eynard, B., Rivest, L., Gomes, S.: An assembly oriented design framework for product structure engineering and assembly sequence planning. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 27(1), 33–46 (2011)
Göpfert, I., Schulz, M.: Logistics integrated product development in the German automotive industry: current state, trends and challenges. In: Kreowski, H.J., Scholz-Reiter, B., Thoben, K.D. (eds.) Dynamics in Logistics, pp. 509–519. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35966-8_43
Graham, R.L.: Bounds for certain multiprocessing anomalies. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 45(9), 1563–1581 (1966)
Herrmann, C., Krahn, H., Rumpe, B., Schindler, M., Völkel, S.: An algebraic view on the semantics of model composition. In: Akehurst, D.H., Vogel, R., Paige, R.F. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4530, pp. 99–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72901-3_8
Pralet, C., Verfaillie, G.: Dynamic online planning and scheduling using a static invariant-based evaluation model. In: Borrajo, D., Kambhampati, S., Oddi, A., Fratini, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS 2013, Rome, Italy, 10–14 June 2013. AAAI (2013)
Salay, R., Mylopoulos, J., Easterbrook, S.: Using macromodels to manage collections of related models. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 141–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02144-2_15
Shenas, D.G., Derakhshan, S.: Organizational approaches to the implementation of simultaneous engineering. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 14(10), 30–43 (1994)
Sprock, T., McGinnis, L.F.: Analysis of functional architectures for discrete event logistics systems (DELS). Procedia Comput. Sci. 44, 517–526 (2015)
Wisnosky, D.E., Vogel, J.: DoDAF Wizdom: A practical guide to planning. Managing and Executing Projects to Build Enterprise Architectures Using the Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Polacsek, T., Roussel, S., Bouissiere, F., Cuiller, C., Dereux, PE., Kersuzan, S. (2017). Towards Thinking Manufacturing and Design Together: An Aeronautical Case Study. In: Mayr, H., Guizzardi, G., Ma, H., Pastor, O. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10650. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69903-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69904-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)