Abstract
This chapter introduces an overview on the formulation of architecture principles, guidelines for a semi-formal definition and rules for modelling the architecture principles. We give insights on analysis and impact evaluation of aforementioned principles on the design of architecture models and on the implementation of enterprise architecture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abcouwer, A., Maes, R., & Truijens, J. (1997). Contouren van een generiek model voor informatiemanagement. Primavera working paper, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. In Dutch.
Abraham, R. (2013). Enterprise architecture artifacts as boundary objects - A framework of properties. In ECIS 2013, Paper 120. Last checked on July 15, 2016. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_cr/120/
Abraham, R., & Aier, S. (2012). Architectural coordination of transformation: implications from game theory. In H. Rahman, A. Mesquita, I. Ramos, & B. Pernici (Eds.), Knowledge and Technologies in Innovative Information Systems – Proceedings of the 7th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS 2012), Guimaraes, Portugal (Vol. 129, pp. 82–96). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33244-9_6.
Abraham, R., Aier, S., & Labusch, N. (2012a). Enterprise architecture as a means for coordination – An empirical study on actual and potential practice. In H. Rahman, A. Mesquita, I. Ramos, & B. Pernici (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS 2012), Guimaraes, Portugal. Last checked on July 15, 2016. http://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2012/33/
Abraham, R., Aier, S., Labusch, N., & Winter, R. (2013a). Understanding coordination support of enterprise architecture management – Empirical analysis and implications for practice. In Proceedings of the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2013), Chicago, IL. Last checked on February 15, 2017. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2013/EnterpriseSystems/GeneralPresentations/13/
Abraham, R., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2012b). Two speeds of EAM – A dynamic capabilities perspective. In S. Aier, M. Ekstedt, F. Matthes, E. Proper, J. L. Sanz (Eds.), Trends in enterprise architecture research and practice driven research on enterprise transformation (pp. 111–128). Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-34162-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34163-2
Abraham, R., Niemietz, H., de Kinderen, S., & Aier, S. (2013b). Can boundary objects mitigate communication defects in enterprise transformation? Findings from expert interviews. In R. Jung & M. Reichert (Eds.), Enterprise modelling and information systems architectures (EMISA 2013) (pp. 27–40). Bonn: Köllen. ISBN 978-3-88579-616-9.
Abraham, R., Tribolet, J., & Winter, R. (2013c). Transformation of multi-level systems – Theoretical grounding and consequences for enterprise architecture management. In H. A. Proper, D. Aveiro, & K. Gaaloul (Eds.), Advances in Enterprise Engineering VII – Proceedings of the 3rd Enterprise Engineering Working Conference (EEWC 2013), Kirchberg, Luxembourg (Vol. 146, pp. 73–87). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-38116-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38117-1_6
Achterbergh, J., & Vriens, D. (2009). Organisations: Social systems conducting experiments. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-00109-3.
Ackoff, R. L. (1971). Towards a system of system concepts. Management Science, 17(11), 661–671.
Ågerfalk, P. J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2006). Exploring the concept of method rationale: A conceptual tool. In K. Siau (Ed.), Advanced topics in database research (Vol. 5, p. 63). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. ISBN 978-1-591-40935-9.
Ahlemann, F. (2009). Towards a conceptual reference model for project management information systems. International Journal of Project Management, 27(1), 19–30.
Aier, S. (2013). Understanding the role of organizational culture for design and success of enterprise architecture management. In R. Alt & B. Franczyk (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI2013) (pp. 879–894).
Aier, S. (2014). The role of organizational culture for grounding, management, guidance and effectiveness of enterprise architecture principles. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 12(1), 43–70. ISSN 1617-9846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-012-0206-8
Aier, S., Ekstedt, M., Matthes, F., Proper, H. A., & Sanz, J. (Eds.). (2012). Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research and Practice-Driven (TEAR 2012) and the 5th Working Conference on Practice-driven Research on Enterprise Transformation (PRET 2012). Held at the Open Group Conference, Barcelona, Spain (Vol. 131). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-34162-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34163-2
Aier, S., Fischer, C., & Winter, R. (2011). Construction and evaluation of a meta-model for enterprise architecture design principles. In A. Bernstein & G. Schwabe (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2011), Zürich, Switzerland (pp. 637–644).
Aier, S., & Gleichauf, B. (2010). Application of enterprise models for engineering enterprise transformation. Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA), 5(1), 56–72.
Aier, S., Riege, C., & Winter, R. (2008). Unternehmensarchitektur – Literaturüberblick und Stand der Praxis. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 50(4), 292–304.
Aier, S., & Schelp, J. (2010). A reassessment of enterprise architecture implementation. In A. Dan, F. Gittler, & F. Toumani (Eds.), Service-oriented computing (Vol. 6275, pp. 35–47). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-16132-2.
Aier, S., & Weiss, S. (2012). An institutional framework for analyzing organizational responses to the establishment of architectural transformation. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2012), Barcelona, Spain, Paper 228.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Akkermans, H., Baida, Z., Gordijn, J., Peiia, N., Altuna, A., & Laresgoiti, I. (2004). Value webs: Using ontologies to bundle real-world services. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 19(4), 57–66.
Aladwani, A. M. (2001). Change management strategies for successful ERP implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 7(3), 266–275.
Alt, R., & Franczyk, B. (Eds.). (2013). Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2013), Leipzig, Germany.
Amyot, D., Horkoff, J., Gross, D., & Mussbacher, G. (2009). A lightweight GRL profile for i* modeling. In Workshop Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Conceptual Modeling (ER 2009): CoMoL, ETheCoM, FP-UML, MOST-ONISW, QoIS, RIGiM, SeCoGIS, Gramado, Brazil (Vol. 5833, pp. 254–264). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-04946-0. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04947-7_31
Amyot, D., Shamsaei, A., Kealey, J., Tremblay, E., Miga, A., Mussbacher, G., et al. (2012). Towards advanced goal model analysis with jUCMNav. In Workshop Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Conceptual Modeling (ER 2012): Florence, Italy: CMS, ECDM-NoCoDA, MoDIC, MORE-BI, RIGiM, SeCoGIS, WISM (Vol. 7518, pp. 201–210). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-33998-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33999-8_25
Armour, F. J., Kaisler, S. H., & Liu, S. Y. (1999). A big-picture look at enterprise architectures. IT Professional, 1(1), 35–42. ISSN 1520-9202. https://doi.org/10.1109/6294.774792
Aschmoneit, P., & Heitmann, M. (2002). Customer centred community application design: Introduction of the means-end chain framework for product design of community applications. International Journal on Media Management, 4(1), 13–20.
Asfaw, T., Bada, A., & Allario, F. (2009). Enablers and challenges in using enterprise architecture concepts to drive transformation: Perspectives from Private Organizations and Federal Government Agencies. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 5(3), 18–28.
Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London, UK: Chapman & Hall. ISBN 0-412-05670-4.
Ashby, W. R. (1960). Design for a brain: The origin of adaptive behavior. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Aspara, J., Lamberg, J.-A., Laukia, A., & Tikkanen, H. (2011). Strategic management of business model transformation: Lessons from Nokia. Management Decision, 49(4), 611–647.
Association for Information Systems. (2011). Senior Scholars’ Basket of Journals.
Åström, K. J., & Murray, R. M. (2008). Feedback systems: An introduction for scientists and engineers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691135762.
Aumann, R. J. (2008). Game theory. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave dictionary of economics. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Aveiro, D., Bjeković, M., Caetano, A., Fleischmann, A., Heuser, L., de Kinderen, S., et al. (Eds.). (2014). Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (CBI 2014), Geneva, Switzerland (Vol. 2). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. ISBN 978-1-4799-5779-8.
Axelos. (2009). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2. London, UK: The Stationery Office. ISBN 978-0-113-31059-3.
Axelos. (2015). ITIL foundation handbook. London, UK: The Stationery Office. ISBN 978-0113314690.
Babüroğlu, O. (1988). The vortical environment: The fifth in the Emery-Trist levels of organizational environments. Human Relations, 41(3), 181–210.
Balogun, J., Hope Hailey, V., Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (2003). Exploring strategic change (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Financial Times, Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-273-68327-8.
Baptista, J. J. (2009). Institutionalisation as a process of interplay between technology and its organisational context of use. Journal of Information Technology, 24(4), 305–319.
Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280.
Baumöl, U. (2005). Strategic agility through situational method construction. In R. Reichwald & A. S. Huff (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th European Academy of Management Annual Conference (EURAM 2005).
Baumöl, U. (2006). Methodenkonstruktion für das Business-IT-Alignment. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 48(5), 314–322.
Baumöl, U. (2008). Change management in organisationen: Situative methodenkonstruktion für flexible Veränderungsprozesse. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
Becker, J., Beverungen, D. F., & Knackstedt, R. (2010). The challenge of conceptual modeling for product–service systems: Status-Quo and perspectives for reference models and modeling languages. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 8(1), 33–66.
Becker, J., & Delfmann, P. (2007). Reference modeling – Efficient information systems design through reuse of information models. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.
Becker, J., Delfmann, P., & Knackstedt, R. (2007a). Adaptive reference modeling: Integrating configurative and generic adaptation techniques for information models. In J. Becker & P. Delfmann (Eds.), Reference modeling (pp. 27–58). Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.
Becker, J., Janiesch, C., & Pfeiffer, D. (2007b). Reuse mechanisms in situational method engineering. In J. Ralyté, S. Brinkkemper, & B. Henderson-Sellers (Eds.), Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference on Situational Method Engineering (ME 2007), Geneva, Switzerland (Vol. 244, pp. 79–93). IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-73946-5.
Becker, J., Rosemann, M., & Schütte, R. (1995). Grundsätze ordnungsmässiger Modellierung. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 37(5), 435–445.
Becker, J., Rosemann, M., & von Uthmann, C. (2000). Guidelines of business process modeling. In W. M. P. van der Aalst, J. Desel, & A. Oberweis (Eds.), Business process management – Models, techniques, and empirical studies (Vol. 1806, pp. 30–49). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-67454-2.
Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline – Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 183–194.
Bernard, S. (2006). Using enterprise architecture to integrate strategic, business, and technology planning. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 2(4), 11–28.
Bhattacharya, P. J., Seddon, P. B., & Scheepers, R. (2010). Enabling strategic transformations with enterprise systems: Beyond operational efficiency. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2010), St. Louis, MO, Paper 55. Association for Information Systems. ISBN 978-0-615-41898-8. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.
Bhattacherjee, A., Perols, J., & Sanford, C. (2008). Information technology continuance: A theoretic extension and empirical test. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(1), 17–26.
Bischoff, S., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2014). Use IT or lose IT? The role of pressure for use and utility of enterprise architecture artifacts. In D. Aveiro et al. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (IEEE-CBI) (pp. 133–140). ISBN 978-1-4799-5779-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2014.56
Bisel, R. S., & Barge, J. K. (2010). Discursive positioning and planned change in organizations. Human Relations, 64(2), 257–283.
Bjeković, M., Proper, H. A., & Sottet, J.-S. (2012). Towards a coherent enterprise modelling landscape. In K. Sandkuhl, U. Seigerroth, & J. Stirna (Eds.), Short Paper Proceedings of the 5th IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling, Rostock, Germany, November 7-8, 2012 (Vol. 933). CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-933/pap3.pdf
Bjeković, M., Proper, H. A., & Sottet, J.-S. (2014). Embracing pragmatics. In E. Yu, G. Dobbie, M. Jarke, & S. Purao (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2014), Atlanta, GA (Vol. 8824, pp. 431–444). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer: Heidelberg, Germany. ISBN 978-3-319-12205-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12206-9
Boh, W. F., & Yellin, D. (2007). Using enterprise architecture standards in managing information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 163–207.
Boland, R. J., & Tenkasi, R. V. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350–372.
Borst, W. N. (1997). Construction of engineering ontologies for knowledge sharing and reuse. PhD thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, S. (1977). MIS problems and failures - A socio-technical perspective. Part I - The causes. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 17–32.
Boudreau, M.-C., & Robey, D. (1996). Coping with contradictions in business process re-engineering. Information Technology & People, 9(4), 40–57.
Bowen, J. P., & Hinchey, M. G. (1995). Seven more myths of formal methods. IEEE Software, 12(4), 34–41.
Bradley, R. V., Pratt, R. M. E., Byrd, T. A., Outlay, C. N., & Wynn, J. (2012). Enterprise architecture, IT effectiveness and the mediating role of IT alignment in US hospitals. Informations Systems Journal, 22, 97–127.
Breu, K. (2001). The role and relevance of management cultures in the organizational transformation process. International Studies of Management and Organization, 31(2), 28–47.
BRG. (2007). The Business Motivation Model – Business Governance in a Volatile World. Technical Report Release 1.3, The Business Rules Group.
Briggs, R. O. (2004). On theory-driven design and deployment of collaboration systems (Vol. 3198). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 3-540-23016-5.
Briggs, R. O., Kolfschoten, G. L., Vreede, G. J. d., & Dean, D. L. (2006). Defining Key Concepts for Collaboration Engineering. In R.-A. Guillermo & A. B. Ignacio (Eds.), Proceedings of 12th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2006), Acapulco, México. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2006/17/
Brinkkemper, S. (1996). Method engineering: Engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology, 38(4), 275–280.
Burge, J., & Brown, D. C. (2000). Reasoning with design rationale. In Artificial intelligence in design (pp. 611–629). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Burge, J. E., Carroll, J. M., McCall, R., & Mistrik, I. (2008). Rationale-based software engineering. In A. Dutoit, R. McCall, I. Mistrík, & B. Paech (Eds.), Rationale-based software engineering. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-30997-0.
By, R. T. (2007). Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 5(4), 369–380.
Byrd, T. A., Cossick, K. L., & Zmud, R. W. (1992). A synthesis of research on requirements analysis and knowledge acquisition techniques. MIS Ouarterly, 16(1), 117–138.
Cameron, B. H., & McMillan, E. (2013). Analyzing the current trends in enterprise architecture frameworks. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 9(1), 60–71.
Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.
Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.
Cashman, P. M., & Stroll, D. (1987). Achieving sustainable management of complexity: A new view of executive support. Technology and People, 3, 147–173.
Chan, Y. E. (2002). Why haven’t we mastered alignment? The importance of the informal organization structure. MIS Quarterly Executive, 1(2), 97–112.
Chandler, A. D. (1969). Strategy and structure, chapters in the history of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-53009-0.
CHAOS. (1999). CHAOS: A Recipe for Success. Technical Report, The Standish Group International, West Yarmouth, MA.
CHAOS. (2001). Extreme CHAOS. Technical Report, The Standish Group International, West Yarmouth, MA.
Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2002). Shaping up for E-commerce: Institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of Web technologies. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 65–89.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. New York, NY: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-27911-0.
Chiniforooshan Esfahani, H., Yu, E., & Cabot, J. (2010). Situational evaluation of method fragments: An evidence-based goal-oriented approach. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2010), Hammamet, Tunisia (pp. 424–438). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-13093-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13094-6_33
Chmielewicz, K. (1994). Forschungskonzeptionen der Wirtschaftswissenschaften (3rd ed.). Stuttgart, Germany: Schaffer-PoeschelVerlag. In German. ISBN 978-3791091976.
Chorus, G. J. N. M., Janse, Y. H. C., Nellen, C. J. P., Hoppenbrouwers, S. J. B. A., & Proper, H. A. (2007). Formalizing architecture principles using object–role modelling. Via Nova Architectura. Last checked on July 15, 2016. http://tinyurl.com/hvaepms
Ciborra, C. U. (1992). From thinking to tinkering: The grassroots of strategic information systems. The Information Society, 8, 297–309.
Clark, B. H., Abela, A. V., & Ambler, T. (2006). An information processing model of marketing performance measurement. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 14(3), 191–208.
Cohen, S. G., & Gibson, C. B. (2003). In the beginning: Introduction and framework. In S. G. Cohen & C. B. Gibson (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 1–14). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Collins, J., & Porras, J. (1996). Building your company’s vision. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 65–77.
Colyvas, J. A., & Jonsson, S. (2011). Ubiquity and legitimacy: Disentangling diffusion and institutionalization. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 27–53.
Conklin, J. (2003a). The IBIS Manual: A short course in IBIS methodology. Touchstone. Last checked on July 3, 2014. http://tinyurl.com/hcxk6j9
Conklin, J. (2003b). Wicked Problems and Social Complexity. Technical Report, CogNexus Institute, Edgewater, MD.
Conklin, J. (2005). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. New York, NY: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-01768-5.
Conklin, J., Basadur, M., & VanPatter, G. K. (2007). Rethinking wicked problems – Unpacking paradigms, bridging universes. NexD Journal, 10(1).
Cooper, R. B., & Zmud, R. W. (1990). Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Science, 36(2), 123–139.
Corner, P. D., Kinicki, A. J., & Keats, B. W. (1994). Integrating organizational and individual information processing perspectives on choice. Organization Science, 5(3), 294–308.
Cossentino, M., Gaglio, S., Henderson-Sellers, B., & Seidita, V. (2008). A Metamodelling-based Approach for Method Fragment Comparison. In T. A. Halpin, J. Krogstie, & H. A. Proper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD 2008), Held in Conjunction with the 20th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2008), Montpellier, France (Vol. 337, pp. 419–432). CEUR-WS.org.
Cross, J., Earl, M. J., & Sampler, J. L. (1997). Transformation of the IT function at British Petroleum. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 401–423.
Cross, R. L., Yan, A., & Louis, M. R. (2000). Boundary activities in ’boundaryless’ organizations: A case study of a transformation to a team-based structure. Human Relations, 53(6), 841–868.
Cummins, J. D., & Doherty, N. A. (2006). The economics of insurance intermediaries. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73(3), 359–396.
Currie, W. (2009). Contextualising the IT artefact: Towards a wider research agenda for IS using institutional theory. Information Technology & People, 22(1), 63–77.
Czarnecki, K., & Helsen, S. (2006). Feature-based survey of model transformation approaches. IBM Systems Journal, 45(3), 621–645.
Daeuble, G., Werner, M. l., & Nuettgens, M. (2015). Artifact-centered planning and assessing of large design science research projects – A case study. In B. Donnellan, M. Helfert, J. Kenneally, D. VanderMeer, M. Rothenberger & R. Winter (Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2015), Dublin, Ireland (pp. 343–357). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-18714-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_22
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.
Davidson, W. H. (1993). Beyond re-engineering: The three phases of business transformation. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 65–79.
Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. PhD thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318–340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
Davis, G. F., & Greve, H. R. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 1–37.
De Caluwé, L., & Vermaak, H. (2003). Learning to change: A guide for organization change agents. London, UK: Sage Publications. ISBN 9-014-96158-7.
de Kinderen, S. (2010). Needs-driven service bundling in a multi-supplier setting - the computational e 3 service approach. PhD thesis, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
de Kinderen, S., Gaaloul, K., & Proper, H. A. (2012a). Bridging value modelling to ArchiMate via transaction modelling. Software & Systems Modeling, 1–15. ISSN 1619-1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0299-z
de Kinderen, S., Gaaloul, K., & Proper, H. A. (2012b). Integrating value modelling into ArchiMate. In M. Snene (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Exploring Services Science (IESS 2012), Geneva, Switzerland (Vol. 103, pp. 125–139). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-28226-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28227-0_10
de Kinderen, S., Ma, Q., & Proper, H. A. (2014). Model bundling: Towards a value-based componential approach for language engineering. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Value Modelling and Business Ontology (VMBO 2014), Berlin, Germany.
de Kinderen, S., & Proper, H. A. (2013). e3-RoME: A value-based approach for method bundling. In S. Y. S. Shin & J. C. Maldonado (Eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2013), Coimbra, Portuga (pp. 1469–1471). ISBN 978-1-4503-1656-9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2480362.2480635
de Leeuw, A. C. J. (1982). Organisaties: Management, analyse, Ontwikkeling en Verandering, een systeem visie. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum. In Dutch. ISBN 9-023-22247-4.
de Leeuw, A. C. J., & Volberda, H. W. (1996). On the concept of flexibility: A dual control perspective. Omega, International Journal of Management Science, 24(2), 121–139.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success – A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
Department of the Treasury (United States of America) and Chief Information Officer Council. (2000). Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework: Version 1.0.
Derzsi, Z., Gordijn, J., & Kok, K. (2008). Multi-perspective assessment of scalability of IT-enabled networked constellations. In R. H. Sprague (Ed.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), (p. 492). IEEE CS. Last checked on July 15, 2016 http://tinyurl.com/jronzpb
Detert, J. R., Schroeder, R. G., & Mauriel, J. J. (2000). A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 850–863.
Dietz, J. L. G. (2006). Enterprise ontology – Theory and methodology. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-29169-5.
Dietz, J. L. G. (2008). Architecture – Building strategy into design. Netherlands Architecture Forum, Academic Service – SDU, The Hague, the Netherlands. ISBN 978-9-012-58086-1. Last checked on July 15, 2016. http://www.naf.nl
Dietz, J. L. G. (2015). DEMOSL-3 DEMO Specification Language. Technical Report, Enterprise Engineering Institute. http://tinyurl.com/j7a2kz7
Dietz, J. L. G., & Hoogervorst, J. A. P. (2008). Enterprise ontology in enterprise engineering. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 572–579).
Dijkman, R. M., Quartel, D. A. C., Pires, L. F., & van Sinderen, M. J. (2004). A rigorous approach to relate enterprise and computational viewpoints. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2004), Monterey, CA (pp. 187–200). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2004.1342515
Dijksterhuis, M. S., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (1999). Where do new organizational forms come from? Management logics as a source of coevolution. Organization Science, 10(5), 569–582.
DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Dunphy, D. (1996). Organizational change in corporate settings. Human Relations, 49(5), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900501
Dutoit, A. H., McCall, R., Mistrík, I., & Paech, B. (2006). Rationale management in software engineering: Concepts and techniques. In A. H. Dutoit, R. McCall, I. Mistrík, & B. Paech (Eds.), Rationale management in software engineering (pp. 1–48). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-30997-0. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30998-7_1
ECIS. (2013). Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2013), Utrecht, the Netherlands. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_materials
Eilon, S. (1969). Prescription in management decisions. Journal of Management Studies, 6(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1969.tb00590.x
Einhorn, H. J. (1970). The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 73(3), 221.
Elahi, G., & Yu, E. (2012). Comparing alternatives for analyzing requirements trade-offs–In the absence of numerical data. Information and Software Technology, 54(6), 517–530.
Elliot, S. (2011). Transdisciplinary perspectives on environmental sustainability: A resource base and framework for IT-enabled business transformation. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 197–236.
Elving, W. J. L. (2005). The role of communication in organisational change. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(2), 129–138.
Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21–31.
Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1973). Towards a social ecology: Contextual appreciations of the future in the present. Melbourne, Australia: Plenum Publishing.
Eoyang, G., & Holladay, R. (2013). Adaptive action: Leveraging uncertainty in your organization. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books, Stanford University Press.
Espinoza, F. (2007). Enterprise architecture and change management. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 3(2), 27–35.
Falkenberg, E. D., Verrijn–Stuart, A. A., Voss, K., Hesse, W., Lindgreen, P., Nilsson, B. E., et al. (Eds.). (1998). A Framework of Information Systems Concepts. IFIP WG 8.1 Task Group FRISCO, IFIP, Laxenburg, Austria. ISBN 3-901-88201-4.
Faller, H., & de Kinderen, S. (2014). The impact of cultural differences on enterprise architecture effectiveness: A case study. In Proceedings of the 8th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS 2014), Paper 37. AIS Electronic Library. Last checked on July 15, 2016. http://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2014/37
Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529
Feltus, C., Dubois, E., Proper, H. A., Band, I., & Petit, M. (2012). Enhancing the ArchiMate standard with a responsibility modeling language for access rights management. In M. Singh Gaur, A. Elçi, O. B. Makarevich, M. A. Orgun, & V. Singh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Security of Information and Networks (SIN 2012), Jaipur, India, (pp. 12–19). New York, NY: ACM Press. ISBN 978-1-450-31668-2.
Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2003). Classification of reference models – A methodology and its applications. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 1(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02683509
Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2007). Perspectives on reference modeling. In P. Fettke & P. Loos (Eds.), Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Finkelstein, A., Kramer, J., Nuseibeh, B., Finkelstein, L., & Goedicke, M. (1992). Viewpoints: A framework for integrating multiple perspectives in system development. International Journal on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Special Issue on Trends and Research Directions in Software Engineering Environments, 2(1), 31–58.
Fischer, C., Winter, R., & Aier, S. (2010). What is an enterprise architecture design principle? Towards a consolidated definition. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Enterprise Architecture Challenges and Responses, Yonezawa, Japan.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intentions and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Flyvbjerg, B., & Budzier, A. (2012). Why your IT project may be riskier than you think. Harvard Business Review, 89(9), 23–25.
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1995). The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 541–570.
Franckson, M., & Verhoef, T. F. (Eds.). (1999). Managing risks and planning deliveries. Information Services Procurement Library. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Ten Hagen & Stam. ISBN 9-076-30483-1.
Fredenberger, W. B., Lipp, A., & Watson, H. J. (1997). Information requirements of turnaround managers at the beginning of engagements. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(4), 167–192.
Fry, L. W., Vitucci, S., & Cedillo, M. (2005). Spiritual leadership and army transformation: Theory, measurement, and establishing a baseline. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(5), 835–862.
Furneaux, B., Janasz, T., Schild, T., & Klimmek, R. (2012). Risk management. In A. Uhl & L. A. Gollenia (Eds.), A handbook of business transformation management methodology (pp. 85–107). Farnham, UK: Gower.
Galbraith, J. R. (1974). Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3), 28–36.
Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Organization design (1st ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gardner, D., Fehskens, L., Naidu, M., Rouse, W. B., & Ross, J. W. (2012). Point-counterpoint: Enterprise architecture and enterprise transformation as related but distinct concepts. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 2(4), 283–294.
GEA (2011). GEA Groeiplatform. In Dutch. Last checked on July 6, 2014. http://www.groeiplatformgea.nl
Gersick, C. J. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 10–36.
Ghanavati, S., Amyot, D., & Peyton, L. (2009). Compliance analysis based on a goal-oriented requirement language evaluation methodology. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2009) (pp. 133–142). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. ISBN 0-520-05728-7.
Gilsdorf, J. W. (1998). Organizational rules on communicating: How employees are – and are not – Learning the ropes. The Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 173–201.
Gordon, L. A., & Miller, D. (1976). A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1(1), 59–69.
Gorry, G. A., & Scott Morton, M. S. (1971). A framework for management information systems. Sloan Management Review, 13(1), 55–70.
Government of the United States of America. (2002). Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Technical Report H. R.3763, Government of the United States of America.
Greefhorst, D., & Proper, H. A. (2011). Architecture principles – The cornerstones of enterprise architecture. Enterprise Engineering Series. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-20278-0.
Greefhorst, D., Proper, H. A., & Plataniotis, G. (2013). The Dutch State of the practice of architecture principles. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 9(4), 20–25.
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., MacFarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.
Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054.
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2008). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.
Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642.
Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–355.
Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007). The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(5), 312–335.
Gregor, S., Müller, O., & Seidel, S. (2013). Reflection, abstraction and theorizing in design and development research. In ECIS 2013, Paper 74. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_materials
Gryning, M., Mertz, M., Khan, A., & Staack, J. (2010). Improve cooperation and alignment by involving the enterprise in the architectural development. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 6(4), 19–26.
Guiltinan, J. P. (1987). The price bundling of services: A normative framework. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 74–85.
Gutman, J. (1997). Means–end chains as goal hierarchies. Psychology and Marketing, 14(6), 545–560.
Hall, J. A. (1990). Seven myths of formal methods. IEEE Software, 7(5), 11–19.
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York, NY: Harper Business.
Harmsen, A. F., Grahlmann, K., & Proper, H. A. (Eds.). (2011). Proceedings of the 3rd Working Conference on Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation (PRET 2010), Delft, the Netherlands (Vol. 89). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-23387-6.
Harmsen, A. F., Proper, H. A., & Kok, N. (2009). Informed governance of enterprise transformations. In H. A. Proper, A. F. Harmsen, & J. L. G. Dietz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st NAF Academy Working Conference on Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformations (PRET 2009), Held at the 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2009), Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Vol. 28, pp. 155–180). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-01858-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01859-6_9
Harmsen, F., & Molnar, W. A. (2013). Perspectives on enterprise transformation: Approaching transforming enterprises with a conceptual meta-model. In Keynotes of the 15th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (CBI 2013), Vienna, Austria. Last checked on July 15, 2016. http://tinyurl.com/h6vk5me
Hawkins, M. A., & Rezazade Mehrizi, M. H. (2012). Knowledge boundary spanning process: Synthesizing four spanning mechanisms. Management Decision, 50(10), 1800–1815.
Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601
Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16.
Henderson, K. (1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(4), 448–473.
Henderson-Sellers, B., & Ralyté, J. (2010). Situational method engineering: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 16(3), 424–478.
Hess, T. J., McNab, A. L., & Basoglu, K. A. (2014). Reliability generalization of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and behavioral intentions. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 1–28.
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28, 75–106.
Hjort-Madsen, K. (2006). Enterprise architecture implementation and management: A case study on interoperability. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2006) (Vol. 4). Washington, DC: IEEE.
Hjort-Madsen, K. (2007). Institutional patterns of enterprise architecture adoption in government. Transforming Government: People, Process And Policy, 1(4), 333–349.
Hock-Hai Teo, B., Tan, C. Y., & Wei, K.-K. (1997). Organizational transformation using electronic data interchange: The case of Tradenet in Singapore. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(4), 139–165.
Hoebeke, L. (1994). Making work systems better: A practitioner’s reflections. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Hofstede, G. H. (1998). Identifying organizational subcultures: An empirical approach. Journal of Management Studies, 35(1), 1–12.
Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications. ISBN 0-8039-7323-3.
Hofstede, G. H., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0071664181.
Holt, A. W. (1988). Diplans: A new language for the study and implementation of coordination. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 6(2), 109–125. ISSN 1046-8188. https://doi.org/10.1145/45941.45942
Hoogervorst, J. A. P. (2004). Enterprise architecture: Enabling integration, agility and change. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 13(3), 213–233.
Hoogervorst, J. A. P. (2009). Enterprise governance and enterprise engineering. Enterprise Engineering Series. Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-92670-2.
Horkoff, J., & Yu, E. (2013). Comparison and evaluation of goal-oriented satisfaction analysis techniques. Requirements Engineering, 18(3), 199–222.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00766-011-0143-y.
Hu, Q., Hart, P., & Cooke, D. (2007). The role of external and internal influences on information systems security – A neo-institutional perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(2), 153–172.
Huy, Q. N. (1999). Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 325–345.
Iacob, M.-E., Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M. M., & Proper, H. A. (2009). ArchiMate 1.0 specification. The Open Group. ISBN 978-9-087-53502-5.
Iacob, M.-E., Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M. M., Proper, H. A., & Quartel, D. A. C. (2012). ArchiMate 2.0 specification. The Open Group. ISBN 1-937-21800-3.
IEEE. (1990). IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology. Technical Report ANSI/IEEE Std 610.12, IEEE Standards Department, Los Alamitos, CA.
IEEE. (2000). Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software Intensive Systems. Technical Report IEEE P1471:2000, ISO/IEC 42010:2007, IEEE Explore, Los Alamitos, CA, Piscataway, NJ. The Architecture Working Group of the Software Engineering Committee, Standards Department, IEEE. ISBN 0-738-12518-0.
IEEE. (2011). Systems and software engineering – Architecture description. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011(E) (Revision of ISO/IEC 42010:2007 and IEEE Std 1471-2000) (pp. 1–46). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2011.6129467
IFIP-IFAC Task Force on Architectures for Enterprise Integration. (2003). GERAM – The generalised enterprise reference architecture and methodology. In P. Bernus, L. Nemes, & G. Schmidt (Eds.) Handbook on enterprise architecture (pp. 21–63), International Handbooks on Information Systems. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-00343-4.
Inmon, W. H. (2000). Creating the Data Warehouse Data Model from the Corporate Data Model. Technical Report, Inmon Consulting Services, Castle Rock, CO.
iStar. (2016). i* – An agent- and goal-oriented modelling framework. Last checked on July 27, 2016. http://www.cs.toronto.edu/km/istar/
Iyamu, T. (2009). The factors affecting institutionalisation of enterprise architecture in the organisation. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC 2009), (pp. 221–225).
Jaffe, E. D. (1979). Multinational marketing intelligence: An information requirements model. Management International Review, 19(2), 53–60.
Jansen, A., & Bosch, J. (2005). Software architecture as a set of architectural design decisions. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE/IFIP Working Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2005) (pp. 109–120). Washington, DC: IEEE.
Jaques, E. (1998). Requisite organization: A total system for effective managerial organization and managerial leadership for the 21st century (2nd ed.). Gloucester, MA: Cason Hall & Co.
Jenkins, J. C. (1977). Radical transformation of organizational goals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(4), 568–586.
Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnston, J., & Madura, J. (2000). Valuing the potential transformation of banks into financial service conglomerates: Evidence from the Citigroup merger. The Financial Review, 35(2), 17–36.
Jones, M. R., & Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 127–157.
Jonkers, H., Band, I., & Quartel, D. (2012). The ArchiSurance case study. White Paper Y121. San Francisco, CA: The Open Group.
Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M. M., Doest, H. t., Arbab, F., Bosma, H., & Wieringa, R. (2006). Enterprise architecture: Management tool and blueprint for the organisation. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(2), 63–66.
Jung, R., & Reichert, M. (Eds.). (2013). Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2013), St. Gallen, Switzerland, (Vol. 222). Lecture Notes in Informatics. Bonn, Germany: Gesellschaft für Informatiek. ISBN 978-3-88579-616-9.
Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P., & Barrows, E. A. (2008). Developing the strategy: Vision, value gaps, and analysis. Balanced Scorecard Review.https://hbr.org/product/developing-the-strategy-vision-value-gaps-and-analysis/B0801A-PDF-ENG.
Karsten, H., Lyytinen, K., Hurskainen, M., & Koskelainen, T. (2001). Crossing boundaries and conscripting participation: Representing and integrating knowledge in a paper machinery project. European Journal of Information Systems, 10(2), 89–98.
Keidel, R. W. (1994). Rethinking organizational design. Academy of Management Executive, 8(4), 12–28.
Keller, S., & Price, C. (2011). Beyond performance: How great organizations build ultimate competitive advantage (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Kilmann, R. (1995). A holistic program and critical success factors of corporate transformation. European Management Journal, 13(2), 175–186.
King, J. L., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K. L., McFarlan, F. W., Raman, K. S., & Yap, C. S. (1994). Institutional factors in information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 5(2), 139–169.
Kleinmuntz, D. N., & Schkade, D. A. (1993). Information displays and decision processes. Psychological Science, 4, 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00265.x
Korhonen, J. J., & Hiekkanen, K. (2013). Doing IT better: An organization design perspective. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance (ECMLG 2013), Klagenfurt, Austria.
Korhonen, J. J., & Molnar, W. A. (2014). Enterprise architecture as capability: Strategic application of competencies to govern enterprise transformation. In H. A. Proper & J. Ralyté (Eds.), 16th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics. ISBN 978-1-4799-5779-8.
Korhonen, J. J., & Poutanen, J. (2013). Tripartite approach to enterprise architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 9(1), 28–38.
Kosanke, K. (1995). CIMOSA – Overview and status. Computers in Industry, 27(2), 101–109.
Kotlarsky, J., van den Hooff, B., & Houtman, L. (2012). Are we on the same page? Knowledge boundaries and transactive memory system development in cross-functional teams. Communication Research, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212469402
Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59–67.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Professional.
Kraus, G., Becker-Kolle, C., & Fischer, T. (2006). Handbuch change-management: Steuerung von Veränderungsprozessen in Organisationen. Einflussfaktoren und Beteiligte. Konzepte, Instrumente und Methoden (2nd ed.). Berlin, Germany: Cornelsen. ISBN 978-3-589-23635-0.
Kruchten, P. (2004). An ontology of architectural design decisions in software intensive systems. In 2nd Groningen Workshop on Software Variability (pp. 54–61).
Kruchten, P., Lago, P., & van Vliet, H. (2006). Building up and reasoning about architectural knowledge. In C. Hofmeister, I. Crnkovic, & R. Reussner (Eds.), Quality of software architectures (Vol. 4214, pp. 43–58). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-48819-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/11921998_8
Kunz, W., & Rittel, H. W. J. (1970). Issues as Elements of Information Systems. Technical Report, Studiengruppe für Systemforschung, Heidelberg, Germany. Last checked on July 27, 2016. http://tinyurl.com/zf2rmxv
Kurpjuweit, S., & Winter, R. (2007). Viewpoint-based meta model engineering. In M. Reichert, S. Strecker, & K. Turowski (Eds.), Proceedings of EMISA 2007 - 2nd International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, St. Goar, Germany (pp. 143–161).
Labusch, N. (2015). Information requirements in enterprise transformations: An enterprise architecture management perspective. PhD thesis, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Labusch, N., & Aier, S. (2014). Information provision as a success factor in the architectural support of enterprise transformations. In Aveiro et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (pp. 141–148). ISBN 978-1-4799-5779-8.https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2014.31
Labusch, N., Aier, S., Rothenberger, M., & Winter, R. (2014a). Architectural support of enterprise transformations: Insights from corporate practice. In D. Kundisch, L. Suhl, & L. Beckmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2014), (pp. 1048–1060). Universität Paderborn.
Labusch, N., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2013). Beyond enterprise architecture modeling – What are the essentials to support enterprise transformations? In R. Jung & M. Reichert (Eds.), Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2013) (pp. 13–26). ISBN 978-3-88579-616-9.
Labusch, N., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2014b). A reference model for the information-based support of enterprise transformations. In M. C. Tremblay, D. v. d. Meer, M. Rothenberger, A. Gupta, & V. Yoon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2014), Miami, FL (Vol. 8463, pp. 194–208) Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Labusch, N., & Winter, R. (2013). Towards a conceptualization of architectural support for enterprise transformation. In ECIS 2013, Paper 116. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_cr/116
Lahrmann, G., Labusch, N., Winter, R., & Uhl, A. (2012). Management of large-scale transformation programs: State of the practice and future potential. In S. Aier et al. (Eds.), Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research and Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation (pp. 253–267). ISBN 978-3-642-34162-5. https://doi.org/2010.1007/978-3-642-34163-2_15
Landry, S. J., Levin, K., Rowe, D., & Nickelson, M. (2009). Enabling collaborative work across different communities of practice through boundary objects: Field studies in air traffic management. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(1), 75–93.
Lange, M. (2012). Evaluating the realization of benefits from enterprise architecture management: Construction and validation of a theoretical model: Dissertation. Wirtschaftsinformatik. München, Germany: Verlag Dr. Hut. ISBN 978-3-8439-0558-9.
Lankhorst, M. M. (Ed.). (2012). Enterprise architecture at work: Modelling, communication and analysis (3rd ed.). Enterprise Engineering Series. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-29650-5.
Lankhorst, M. M., Proper, H. A., & Jonkers, H. (2010). The anatomy of the ArchiMate language. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD), 1(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01862-6_30
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2006). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (10th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lee, J. (1991). Extending the Potts and Bruns model for recording design rationale. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering, 1991 (pp. 114–125). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
Lee, J., & Lai, K.-Y. (1991). What’s in design rationale? Human–Computer Interaction, 6(3–4), 251–280.
Levendovszky, T., Karsai, G., Maroti, M., Ledeczi, A., & Charaf, H. (2002). Model reuse with metamodel-based transformations. Software Reuse: Methods, Techniques, and Tools, 2319, 166–178.https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-46020-9_12
Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2005). The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 335–363.
Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2003). Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 657–678.
Liaskos, S., McIlraith, S. A., Sohrabi, S., & Mylopoulos, J. (2011). Representing and reasoning about preferences in requirements engineering. Requirements Engineering, 16(3), 227–249.
Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.
Lindström, A. (2006). On the syntax and semantics of architectural principles. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2006).
Lineweaver, C. H., Davies, P. C. W., & Ruse, M. (2013). What is complexity? Is it increasing? In C. H. Lineweaver, P. C. W. Davies, & M. Ruse (Eds.) Complexity and the arrow of time. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. (1992). Diffusion of information technology outsourcing: Influence sources and the Kodak effect. Information Systems Research, 3(4), 334–358.
Lohman, F. A. B., Sol, H. G., & de Vreede, G. (2003). The illusion of effective management information: A critical perspective. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2003).
Luiten, G., Cooper, G., Froese, T., Junge, R., Björk, B. C., Karstila, K., et al. (1993). An information reference model for architecture, engineering, and construction. In First International Conference on the Management of Information Technology for Construction (pp. 1–10).
Lyytinen, K., & Damsgaard, J. (2001). What’s wrong with the diffusion of innovation theory? In M. A. Ardis, & B. L. Marcolin (Eds.), Diffusing software product and process innovations (pp. 173–190). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Macdonald, I., Burke, C., & Stewart, K. (2006). Systems leadership: Creating positive organisations. Burlington, VT: Gower.
MacLean, A., Young, R. M., Bellotti, V. M. E., & Moran, T. P. (1991). Questions, options, and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human–computer interaction, 6(3–4), 201–250.
Magalhães, R., & Proper, H. A. (2017). Model-enabled design and engineering of organisations. Organisational Design and Enterprise Engineeering, 1(1), 1–12.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41251-016-0005-9.
Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0058-9
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1990). What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? In Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 1990).
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87–119. ISSN 0360-0300. https://doi.org/10.1145/174666.174668
Mandis, S. G. (2013). What happened to Goldman Sachs: An insider’s story of organizational drift and its unintended consequences. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. ISBN 978-1422194195. http://www.marchmenthill.com/qsi-online/2011-06-19/organisational-drift
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251–266.
Marchand, D. A., & Peppard, J. (2008). Designed to Fail: Why IT Projects Under-Achieve and What To Do About It. Technical Report IMD 2008-11, IMD International.
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change – Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583–598.
Marosin, D., & Ghanavati, S. (2015). Measuring and managing the design restriction of enterprise architecture (EA) principles on EA models. In Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law, RELAW 2015, Ottawa, ON, Canada, August 25, 2015 (pp. 37–46). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society. ISBN 978-1-5090-0104-0. https://doi.org/10.1109/RELAW.2015.7330210
Marosin, D., Ghanavati, S., & van der Linden, D. J. T. (2014). A principle-based goal-oriented requirements language (GRL) for enterprise architecture. In F. Dalpiaz & J. Horkoff (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International i* Workshop Co-located with the 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2014), Thessaloniki, Greece (Vol. 1157). CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1157/paper4.pdf
Marosin, D., van Zee, M., & Ghanavati, S. (2016). Formalizing and modeling enterprise architecture (EA) principles with goal-oriented requirements language (GRL). In S. Nurcan, P. Soffer, M. Bajec, & J. Eder (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2016), Ljubljana, Slovenia (Vol. 9694, pp. 205–220). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-39695-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39696-5_13
Martinez, J. I., & Jarillo, J. C. (1989). The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(3), 489–514.
Matthes, F., Buckl, S., Leitel, J., & Schweda, C. M. (2008). Enterprise Architecture Management Tool Survey 2008. Chair for Informatics 19 (sebis), Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
McAdam, R. (2003). Radical change: A conceptual model for research agendas. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(4), 226–235.
McCann, J., & Selsky, J. (1984). Hyperturbulence and the emergence of type 5 environments. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 460–470.
McGinnis, L. F. (2007). Enterprise modeling and enterprise transformation. Information, Knowledge, Systems Management, 6(1–2), 123–143.
McMorland, J. (2005). Are you big enough your job? Is your job big enough for you? Exploring levels of work in organisations. University of Auckland Business Review, 7(2), 75–83.
Meertens, L. O., Iacob, M. E., Nieuwenhuis, L. J. M., van Sinderen, M. J., Jonkers, H., & Quartel, D. (2012). Mapping the business model canvas to ArchiMate. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2012), Trento, Italy (pp. 1694–1701). New York, NY: ACM. ISBN 978-1-4503-0857-1. https://doi.org/10.1145/2245276.2232049
Mentzer, J. T., Rutner, S. M., & Matsuno, K. (1997). Application of the means-end value hierarchy model to understanding logistics service value. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 27(9/10), 630–643.
Meriam–Webster. (2003). Meriam–Webster Online, Collegiate Dictionary.
Mernik, M., Heering, J., & Sloane, A. M. (2005). When and how to develop domain-specific languages. ACM Computing Surveys, 37(4), 316–344.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Mignerat, M., & Rivard, S. (2009). Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 24(4), 369–391.
Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. W., & Lampel, J. (2001). Strategy Safari: The Complete guide through the wilds of strategic management. New York, NY: Free Press.
Mintzberg, H., Raisingham, D., & Théorêt, A. (1976). The structure of unstructured decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(21), 246–275. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2392045
Moen, R., & Norman, C. (2006). Evolution of the PDCA cycle. Last checked on February 17, 2017. http://www.pkpinc.com/files/NA01MoenNormanFullpaper.pdf
Molnar, W. A., & Korhonen, J. J. (2014). Research paradigms and topics in enterprise engineering – Analysis of recent conferences and workshops. In Eigth IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS 2014), Marrakesh, Morocco. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Explore.
Moody, D. L. (2009). The “Physics” of notations: Toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Software Engineering, 35(6), 756–779. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2009.67
Mykhashchuk, M., Buckl, S., Dierl, T., & Schweda, C. M. (2011). Charting the landscape of enterprise architecture management. In A. Bernstein & G. Schwabe (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2011) (Vol. 1, pp. 570–577).
Nabukenya, J. (2005). Collaboration engineering for policy making: A theory of good policy in a collaborative action. In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2005), Regensburg, Germany (pp. 54–61).
Nabukenya, J. (2009). Improving the quality of organisational policy making using collaboration engineering. PhD thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Nabukenya, J., van Bommel, P., & Proper, H. A. (2007). Collaborative IT Policy-making as a means of achieving Business-IT Alignment. In B. Pernici & J. A. Gulla (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Business/IT Alignment and Interoperability (BUSITAL 2007), Held in Conjunction with the 19th Conference on Advanced Information Systems (CAiSE 2007), Trondheim, Norway (pp. 461–468. Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press. ISBN 978-8-251-92245-6.
Nabukenya, J., van Bommel, P., & Proper, H. A. (2009). A theory-driven design approach to collaborative policy making processes. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42), Los Alamitos, Hawaii. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Nakakawa, A. (2012). A collaboration process for enterprise architecture creation. PhD thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. ISBN 978-90-8891496-6.
Nakakawa, A., van Bommel, P., & Proper, H. A. (2010a). Challenges of involving stakeholders when creating enterprise architecture. In B. F. v. Dongen & H. A. Reijers (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th SIKS/BENAIS Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (EIS 2010), Eindhoven, the Netherlands (pp. 43–55). Last checked on July 15, 2016. http://tinyurl.com/hhzqz7c
Nakakawa, A., van Bommel, P., & Proper, H. A. (2010b). Towards a theory on collaborative decision making in enterprise architecture. In R. Winter, J. L. Zhao, & S. Aier (Eds.), Proceedings on the International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2010), St. Gallen, Switzerland (Number 6105, pp. 538–541). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Nakakawa, A., van Bommel, P., & Proper, H. A. (2011a). Applying soft systems methodology in enterprise architecture creation workshops. In M. Nüttgens, O. Thomas, & B. Weber (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2011), Hamburg, Germany (Number 190, pp. 37–50). Lecture Notes in Informatics. Bonn, Germany: Gesellschaft für Informatiek. ISBN 978-3-885-79284-0.
Nakakawa, A., van Bommel, P., & Proper, H. A. (2011b). Definition and validation of requirements for collaborative decision-making in enterprise architecture creation. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 20(1), 83–136. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021884301100216X
Nakakawa, A., van Bommel, P., & Proper, H. A. (2013). Supplementing enterprise architecture approaches with support for executing collaborative tasks – A case of TOGAF ADM. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 22(2), 1350007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021884301100216X
Nakakoji, K. (1996). Beyond language translation: Crossing the cultural divide. IEEE Software, 13(6), 42–46.
NBS. (1993). Integrated Definition for Information Modeling (IDEF0) (Vol. 183). National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, USA. Last checked on July 15, 2016. http://www.idef.com/idefo-function_modeling_method/
Neyer, A.-K., & Maicher, L. (2013). Understanding the role of objects in interactive innovation. In R. Alt & B. Franczyk (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI2013) (pp. 756–778).
Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., & Swan, J. (2012). Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612–629.
Nielsen, J. A., Mathiassen, L., & Newell, S. (2014). Theorization and translation in information technology institutionalization: Evidence from Danish home care. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 165–186.
Niemann, K. D. (2005). IT governance and enterprise architecture - Impact of IT cost reduction on innovation power. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 1(1), 31–40.
Niemietz, H., de Kinderen, S., & Constantinidis, C. (2013). Understanding the role of subcultures in the enterprise architecture process. In ECIS 2013 (pp. 298–305). Last checked on July 15, 2016. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_cr/129/
Normann, R. (2001). Reframing business: When the map changes the landscape. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
OCIO. (1996). Summary of Major Provisions of the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996. Technical Report, U.S. Department of Commerce – Office of the Chief Information Officer.
OECD. (2002). The Greek Social Security System. Technical Report, Ministry of Labour and Social Security, General Secretariat for Social Security.
Okhuysen, G. A., & Bechky, B. A. (2009). Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 463–502.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
Oliver, R. L. (1977). Effect of expectation and discontinuation on postexposure product evaluations: An alternative interpretation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 480–486.
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469.
Olivier, A. (2013). Organisational design: What your university forgot to teach you. München, Germany: Xlibris.
OMG. (2003). UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification – Final Adopted Specification. Technical Report ptc/03–08–02, Object Management Group, Needham, MA.
OMG. (2007). OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Infrastructure, V2.1.2. Technical Report, The Object Management Group, Needham, MA. http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.1.2/Infrastructure/PDF
OMG. (2011). Business Process Modeling Notation, V2.0. Technical Report OMG Document Number: formal/2011-01-03, Object Management Group, Needham, MA.
Op ’t Land, M., & Proper, H. A. (2007). Impact of principles on enterprise engineering. In H. Österle, J. Schelp, & R. Winter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1965–1976). St. Gallen, Switzerland: University of St. Gallen.
Op ’t Land, M., Proper, H. A., Waage, M., Cloo, J., & Steghuis, C. (2008). Enterprise architecture – Creating value by informed governance. Enterprise Engineering Series. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-85231-5.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. R. (2001). Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145–165.
Otto, B., & Österle, H. (2012). Principles for knowledge creation in collaborative design science research. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2012), Orlando, FL (pp. 2408–2423).
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 3–35). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Pareto, L., Eriksson, P., & Ehnebom, S. (2010). Architectural descriptions as boundary objects in system and design work. In D. C. Petriu, N. Rouquette, & Ø. Haugen (Eds.), Model driven engineering languages and systems (pp. 406–419). Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Parsons, J. (2003). Effects of local versus global schema diagrams on verification and communication in conceptual data modeling. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(3), 155–183.
Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. New York, NY: Free Press.
Pawlowski, S. D., & Robey, D. (2004). Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 645–672.
Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 366–387.
Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., & Kuechler, B. (Eds.). (2012). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2012), Las Vegas, NV (Vol. 7286). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-29862-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77.
Peppard, J., & Ward, J. (2004). Beyond strategic infromation systems: Towards an IS capability. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13,167–194.
Peristeras, V., & Tarabanis, K. (2000). Towards an enterprise architecture for public administration using a top-down approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 9,252–260.
Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A., & Ang, C. (2008). Investigating organizational learning in eGovernment projects: A multi-theoretic approach. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 99–123.
Pijpers, V., De Leenheer, P., Gordijn, J., & Akkermans, H. (2012). Using conceptual models to explore business-ICT alignment in networked value constellations. Requirements Engineering, 17(3), 203–226. ISSN 0947-3602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-011-0136-x
Plataniotis, G., de Kinderen, S., Ma, Q., & Proper, H. A. (2015a). A conceptual model for compliance checking support of enterprise architecture decisions. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (CBI 2015), Lisbon, Portugal (Vol. 1, pp. 191–198). https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2015.46
Plataniotis, G., de Kinderen, S., & Proper, H. A. (2013a). Relating decisions in enterprise architecture using decision design graphs. In D. Gasevic, M. Hatala, H. R. Motahari Nezhad, & M. Reichert (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2013), Vancouver, Canada (pp. 139–146). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Explore. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2013.23
Plataniotis, G., de Kinderen, S., & Proper, H. A. (2014a). A computational approach for design rationalization in enterprise architecture. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS 2014), Marrakesh, Morocco.
Plataniotis, G., de Kinderen, S., & Proper, H. A. (2014b). Capturing design rationales in enterprise architecture: A case study. In Proceedings of the 7th IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling (PoEM 2014).
Plataniotis, G., de Kinderen, S., & Proper, H. A. (2014c). Challenges of capturing design rationales in enterprise architecture: A case study. In Proceedings of the 8th Transformation & Engineering of Enterprises Workshop (TEE 2014), Held in Conjunction with the 16th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (CBI 2014), Geneva, Switzerland. CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1182/
Plataniotis, G., de Kinderen, S., & Proper, H. A. (2014d). EA anamnesis: An approach for decision making analysis in enterprise architecture. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD), 5(3), 75–95. ISSN 1947-8186. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijismd.2014070104
Plataniotis, G., de Kinderen, S., van der Linden, D. J. T., Greefhorst, D., & Proper, H. A. (2013b). An empirical evaluation of design decision concepts in enterprise architecture. In J. Grabis, M. Kirikova, J. Zdravkovic, & J. Stirna (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling (PoEM 2013), Riga, Latvia (Vol. 165, pp. 24–38). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-41640-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41641-5_3
Plataniotis, G., Ma, Q., Proper, H. A., & de Kinderen, S. (2015b). Traceability and modeling of requirements in enterprise architecture from a design rationale perspective. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS 2015), Athens, Greece (pp. 518–519). https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2015.7128916
PMI. (2001). Project Management Body of Knowledge. Technical Report, The Project Management Institute.
PMI. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (4th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Poole, M., & DeSanctis, G. (2003). Structuration theory in information systems research: Methods and controversies. In M. Whitman & A. Woszczynski (Eds.), The handbook for information systems research. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Powell, W. W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183–203). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). London, UK: Sage Publications.
Prakken, B. (2000). Information, organization and information systems design: An integrated approach to information problems. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-1461369905.
Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., & Saunders, C. S. (2005). Information processing view of organizations: An exploratory examination of fit in the context of interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 257–294.
Proper, H. A. (2001). ISP for large–scale migrations. Information Services Procurement Library. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Ten Hagen & Stam. ISBN 9-076-30488-2.
Proper, H. A. (2014). Enterprise architecture – Informed steering of enterprises in motion. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference (ICEIS 2013), Angers, France – Revised Selected Papers (Vol. 190, pp. 16–34). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09492-2_2
Proper, H. A., & Lankhorst, M. M. (2014). Enterprise architecture – Towards essential sense-making. Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA), 9(1), 5–21.
Proper, H. A., & Op ’t Land, M. (2010). Lines in the water – The line of reasoning in an enterprise engineering case study from the public sector. In A. F. Harmsen, H. A. Proper, F. Schalkwijk, J. Barjis, & S. J. Overbeek (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Working Conference on Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation (PRET 2010), Delft, the Netherlands (Vol. 69, pp. 193–216). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-16769-0.
Proper, H. A., & Ralyté, J. (Eds.). (2014). Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (CBI 2014), Geneva, Switzerland (Vol. 1). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. ISBN 978-1-4799-5779-8.
Proper, H. A., Verrijn–Stuart, A. A., & Hoppenbrouwers, S. J. B. A. (2005). Towards utility–based selection of architecture–modelling concepts. In S. Hartmann & M. Stumptner (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Asia–Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2005), Newcastle, NSW, Australia (Vol. 42, pp. 25–36). Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Sydney: Australian Computer Society. ISBN 1-920-68225-2.
Prosci. (2014). Best practices in change management (2014th ed.). Loveland, CO: Prosci Inc.
Pulkkinen, M., Naumenko, A., & Luostarinen, K. (2007). Managing information security in a business network of machinery maintenance services business - enterprise architecture as a coordination tool. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(10), 1607–1620.
Purchase, V., Parry, G., Valerdi, R., Nightingale, D., & Mills, J. (2011). Enterprise transformation: Why are we interested, what is it, and what are the challenges? Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 1(1), 14–33.
Purvis, R. L., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (2001). The assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 12(2), 117–135.
Ralyté, J., Brinkkemper, S., & Henderson–Sellers, B. (Eds.). (2008). Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on Situational Method Engineering (SME 2008), Geneva, Switzerland. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-73946-5.
Ramsay, J. (2005). The real meaning of value in trading relationships. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(6), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510599719
Ran, A., & Kuusela, J. (1996). Design decision trees. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design (p. 172). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
Razo-Zapata, I. S., De Leenheer, P., Gordijn, J., & Akkermans, H. (2012). Fuzzy verification of service value networks. In J. Ralyte & X. Franch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2012), Gdansk, Poland. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Razo-Zapata, I. S., Gordijn, J., De Leenheer, P., & Akkermans, H. (2011). Dynamic cluster-based service bundling: A value-oriented framework. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC 2011), Luxembourg. Last checked on July 15, 2016. http://tinyurl.com/zesr25l
Reichert, M., Strecker, S., & Turowski, K. (Eds.). (2007). Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2007), St. Goar am Rhein, Germany (Number 119). Lecture Notes in Informatics. Bonn, Germany: Gesellschaft für Informatik.
Reitsma, E., Jansen, P., van der Werf, E., & van den Steenhoven, H. (2004). Wat is de beste veranderaanpak? Management Executive. In Dutch.http://www.managementexecutive.nl/artikel/2956/Wat-is-de-beste-veranderaanpak.
Richardson, G. L., Jackson, B. M., & Dickson, G. W. (1990). A principles-based enterprise architecture: Lessons from Texaco and Star Enterprise. MIS Quarterly, 14(4), 385–403. ISSN 0276-7783. http://www.jstor.org/stable/249787
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4,155–169.
Rodrigues, L. S., & Amaral, L. (2010). Issues in enterprise architecture value. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 6(4), 27–32.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
Rosenkranz, C., Vraneši, H., & Holten, R. (2014). Boundary interactions and motors of change in requirements elicitation: A dynamic perspective on knowledge sharing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(6), 306–345.
Ross, J. W. (2003). Creating a strategic IT architecture competency: Learning in stages. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2(1), 31–43.
Ross, J. W., & Beath, C. M. (2006). Sustainable IT outsourcing success: Let enterprise architecture be your guide. MIS Quarterly Executive, 5(4), 181–192.
Ross, J. W., & Quaadgras, A. (2012). Enterprise architecture is not just for architects. CISR Research Briefings, 7(9).http://cisr.mit.edu/blog/documents/2012/09/19/2012_0901_architecturelearning_rossquaadgras.pdf/.
Ross, J. W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. C. (2006). Enterprise architecture as strategy: Creating a foundation for business execution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. ISBN 1-591-39839-8.
Rossi, M., Ramesh, B., Lyytinen, K., & Tolvanen, J. P. (2004). Managing evolutionary method engineering by method rationale. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(9), 356–391.
Rothrock, L., & Yin, J. (2008). Integrating compensatory and noncompensatory decision-making strategies in dynamic task environments. In T. Kugler, J. C. Smith, T. Connolly, & Y. J. Son (Eds.), Decision modeling and behavior in complex and uncertain environments. Springer optimization and its applications (Vol. 21, pp. 125–141). New York: Springer.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77131-1_6.
Rouse, W. B. (2005). A theory of enterprise transformation. Systems Engineering, 8(4), 279–295. ISSN 1520-6858. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20035
Rouse, W. B. (2006). Enterprise transformation: Understanding and enabling fundamental change. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Rouse, W. B., & Baba, M. (2006). Enterprise transformation – Fundamental enterprise changes begin by looking at the challenges from technical, behavioral, and social perspectives. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 67–72.
Rowbottom, R., & Billis, D. (1987). Organisational design: The work-levels approach. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
Roy, S., & Kitching, E. (2013). 70% of transformation programs fail. Last checked on August 9, 2016. http://tinyurl.com/zjp9mmx
Rüegg-Stürm, J. (2004). Einführung in die Managementlehre. Bern, Switzerland: Haupt Verleg. ISBN 3-258-06999-9.
Rüegg-Stürm, J. (2005). The new St. Gallen management model: Basic categories of an approach to integrated management. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Safrudin, N., Rosemann, M., Recker, J., & Genrich, M. (2014). A typology of business transformations. 360 ∘ – The Business Transformation Journal, 2014(10), 25–41.
Sarker, S., & Lee, A. S. (1999). IT-enabled organizational transformation: A case study of BPR failure at TELECO. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(1), 83–103.
SCC. (2009). SCOR Frameworks. Technical Report, Supply Chain Council. Last checked on June 15, 2009. http://www.supply-chain.org/resources/scor
Schaeffer, J., Szafron, D., Lobe, G., & Parsons, I. (1993). The enterprise model for developing distributed applications. IEEE Parallel and Distributed Technology, 1(3), 85–96.
Scheer, A.-W. (2000). ARIS – Business process modeling. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 3-540-65835-1.
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN 0-7879-6845-5.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Schelp, J., & Winter, R. (2009). Language communities in enterprise architecture research. In V. Vaishanvi & R. Baskerville (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2009), Philadelphia, PA (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: ACM.
Schmidt, C., & Buxmann, P. (2011). Outcomes and success factors of enterprise IT architecture management: Empirical insight from the international financial services industry. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(2), 168–185.
Schönherr, M. (2009). Towards a common terminology in the discipline of enterprise architecture. In G. Feuerlicht & W. Lamersdorf (Eds.), 3rd Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2008) at the 6th International Conference on Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC 2008) (Vol. 5472, pp. 400–413). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Schrader, U., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2009). VHB-JOURQUAL 2: Method, results, and implications of the German academic association for business research’s journal ranking. BuR - Business Research, 2(2), 180–204.
Schützenberger, M. P. (1954). A tentative classification of goal-seeking behaviours. Journal of Mental Science, 100, 97–102.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization Studies, 29(2), 219–238.
Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.
Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The organization of societal sectors: Propositions and early evidence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 108–140). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline – The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-385-51725-6.
Sidorova, A., & Kappelman, L. A. (2011). Better business-IT alignment through enterprise architecture: An actor-network theory perspective. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 7(1), 39–47.
Simon, D., Fischbach, K., & Schoder, D. (2013). An exploration of enterprise architecture research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 32(1), 1–72.
Simons, R. (1994). Levers of control: How managers use control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. ISBN 978-0-875-84559-3.
Singh, R., Mathiassen, L., Stachura, M. E., & Astapova, E. V. (2011). Dynamic capabilities in home health: IT-enabled transformation of post-acute care. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(2), Article 2.
Sledgianowski, D., & Luftman, J. (2005). IT-business strategic alignment maturity: A case study. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 7(2), 102–120.
Soh, C., & Sia, S. K. (2004). An institutional perspective on sources of ERP package–organisation misalignments. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13(4), 375–197.
Sousa, P., Gabriel, R., Tadao, G., Carvalho, R., Sousa, P. M., & Sampaio, A. (2011). Enterprise transformation: The Serasa Experian case. In F. Harmsen, K. Grahlmann, & E. Proper (Eds.), Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation. PRET 2011 (pp. 134–145). Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-23387-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23388-3_7
Sousa, P., Lima, J., Sampaio, A., & Pereira, C. (2009). An approach for creating and managing enterprise blueprints: A case for IT blueprints. In A. Albani, J. Barjis, & J. L. G. Dietz (Eds.), Advances in enterprise engineering III (Vol. 34, pp. 70–84). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-01914-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01915-9_6
Sowa, J., & Zachman, J. A. (1992). Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 31(3), 590–616.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(4), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
Steenbergen, M. v. (2011). Maturity and effectiveness of enterprise architecture. PhD thesis, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. ISBN 978-90-393-5554-1.
Stensaker, I., Falkenberg, J., & Grønhaug, K. (2008). Implementation activities and organizational sensemaking. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(2), 162–185.
Stiles, P., Uhl, A., & Stratil, P. (2012). Meta management. In A. Uhl & L. A. Gollenia (Eds. 2012), A handbook of business transformation management methodology (pp. 13–29). Farnham: Gower.
Stirna, J., & Persson, A. (2012). Purpose driven competency planning for enterprise modeling projects. In J. Ralyté, X. Franch, S. Brinkkemper, & S. Wrycza (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2012), Gdansk, Poland (Vol. 7328, pp. 662–677). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-31094-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31095-9_43
Strano, C., & Rehmani, Q. (2007). The role of the enterprise architect. International Journal of Information Systems and e-Business Management, 5(4), 379–396.
Stremersch, S., & Tellis, G. J. (2002). Strategic bundling of products and prices: A new synthesis for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 55–72.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Svenson, O. (1979). Process descriptions of decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23(1), 86–112.
Swanson, E. B., & Ramiller, N. C. (1997). The organizing vision in information systems innovation. Organization Science, 8(5), 458–474.
Tamm, T., Seddon, P. B., Shanks, G., & Reynolds, P. (2011a). Delivering business value through enterprise architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 7(2), 17–30.
Tamm, T., Seddon, P. B., Shanks, G., & Reynolds, P. (2011b). How does enterprise architecture add value to organisations? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28(1), 141–168.
Tang, A., Babar, M. A., Gorton, I., & Han, J. (2006). A survey of architecture design rationale. Journal of Systems and Software, 79(12), 1792–1804. ISSN 0164-1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.04.029
Tang, A., Jin, Y., & Han, J. (2007). A rationale-based architecture model for design traceability and reasoning. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(6), 918–934. ISSN 0164-1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.08.040
Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19–49.
The Open Group. (2009). TOGAF version 9. Zaltbommel, the Netherlands: Van Haren Publishing. ISBN 978-9-087-53230-7.
The Open Group. (2011). TOGAF version 9.1 (10th ed.). Zaltbommel, the Netherlands: Van Haren Publishing. ISBN 978-9-087-53679-4.
Thenmozhi, M. (2009). Module 9 - Strategic Management. Lecture Notes, Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India.
Thomas, O. (2005). Understanding the term reference model in information systems research: History, literature analysis and explanation. In C. J. Bussler & A. Haller (Eds.), BPM 2005 International Workshops, BPI, BPD, ENEI, BPRM, WSCOBPM, BPS (Vol. 3812, pp. 484–496). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 175–190). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Tolman, E. C., & Brunswik, E. (1935). The organism and the causal texture of the environment. Psychological Review, 42, 43–77.
Trist, E. (1977). A concept of organizational ecology. Australian Journal of Management, 2(2), 161–175.
Tropos. (2016). Tropos. Last checked on July 27, 2016. http://www.troposproject.org
Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. The Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 613–624.
Tyree, J., & Akerman, A. (2005). Architecture decisions: Demystifying architecture. Software, IEEE, 22(2), 19–27.
Uhl, A., & Gollenia, L. A. (Eds.). (2012). A handbook of business transformation management methodology. Farnham, UK: Gower.
Valorinta, M. (2011). IT alignment and the boundaries of the IT function. Journal of Information Technology, 26(1), 46–59.
van Aken, J. E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219–246.
van Aken, J. E., & Nagel, A. P. (2004). Organising and Managing the Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development. Technical Report, Eindhoven University of Technology. https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/1826685/585732.pdf
van Bommel, P., Buitenhuis, P. G., Hoppenbrouwers, S. J. B. A., & Proper, H. A. (2007). Architecture principles – A regulative perspective on enterprise architecture. In M. Reichert, S. Strecker, & K. Turowski (Eds.), EMISA 2007 (pp. 47–60). Bonn: Gesellschaft fuer Informatik.
van Buuren, R., Gordijn, J., & Janssen, W. (2005). Business case modelling for E-services. In Proceedings of the 18th Bled eConference – eIntegration in Action. AIS.
van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2011). Process mining: Discovery, conformance and enhancement of business processes. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3642193446.
van der Hoek, A., & Wolf, A. L. (2003). Software release management for component-based software. Software—Practice & Experience, 33(1), 77–98.
van der Raadt, B., Bonnet, M., Schouten, S., & van Vliet, H. (2010). The relation between EA effectiveness and stakeholder satisfaction. The Journal of Systems and Software, 83(10), 1954–1969.
van der Raadt, B., Schouten, S., & van Vliet, H. (2008). Stakeholder perception of enterprise architecture. In R. Morrison, D. Balasubramaniam, & K. Falkner (Eds.), Software architecture (Vol. 5292, pp. 19–34). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-88029-5.
van Deursen, A., Klint, P., & Visser, J. (2000). Domain-specific languages: An annotated bibliography. Sigplan Notices, 35(6), 26–36.
van Zee, M. (2016). eGovernment – GRL Extension. Last checked on July 27, 2016. https://github.com/RationalArchitecture/eGovernment
van Zee, M., Bex, F., & Ghanavati, S. (2015). Rationalization of goal models in GRL using formal argumentation. In D. Zowghi, V. Gervasi, & D. Amyot (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2015), Ottawa, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2015.7320426
van Zee, M., Marosin, D., Ghanavati, S., & Bex, F. (2016). RationalGRL: A framework for rationalizing goal models using argument diagrams. In I. Comyn-Wattiau, K. Tanaka, I.-l. Song, S. Yamamoto, & M. Saeki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2016), Gifu, Japan (pp. 553–560). ISBN 978-3-319-46396-4.
van Zee, M., Plataniotis, G., Marosin, D., & van der Linden, D. J. T. (2014). Formalizing enterprise architecture decision models using integrity constraints. In Proper and Ralyté (Eds.), 16h IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) (pp. 143–150). ISBN 978-1-4799-5779-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2014.27
van’t Wout, J., Waage, M., Hartman, H., Stahlecker, M., & Hofman, A. (2010). The integrated architecture framework explained. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-11517-2.
Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2009). Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: Clarifications. Service Science, 1(1), 32–41.
Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145–152.
Vellani, K. (2007). Strategic security management - A risk assessment guide for decision makers. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-12-370897-7. Last checked on July 15, 2016. http://tinyurl.com/jlm97w5
Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2012). A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research. In K. Peffers, M. Rothenberger, & B. Kuechler (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems: Advances in Theory and Practice (pp. 423–438). Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-29862-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_31
Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2016). FEDS: A framework for evaluation in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 77–89.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
Vennix, J. A. M. (1996). Group model building: Facilitating team learning using systems dynamics. New York, NY: Wiley.
Verband der Hochschullehrer für Betriebswirtschaft. (2011). VHB-JOURQUAL 2.1 (2011) – Alphabetische Übersicht JQ 2.1.
Versteeg, G., & Bouwman, H. (2006). Business architecture: A new paradigm to relate business strategy to ICT. Information Systems Frontiers, 8, 91–102.
vom Brocke, J., Petry, M., & Gonser, T. (2012). Business process management. In A. Uhl & L. Gollenia (Eds.), The handbook of business transformation management (pp. 109–139). Farnham: Gower.
vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In S. Newell, E. A. Whitley, N. Pouloudi, J. Wareham, & L. Mathiassen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2009), Verona, Italy (pp. 2206–2217). ISBN 978-8-861-29391-5. Last checked on July 15, 2010. http://is2.lse.ac.uk/asp/aspecis/20090183.pdf
Wagter, R. (2009). Sturen op samenhang op basis van GEA – Permanent en event driven. Zaltbommel, the Netherlands: Van Haren Publishing. In Dutch. ISBN 978-9-087-53406-6.
Wagter, R. (2013). Enterprise coherence governance. PhD thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Wagter, R., Nijkamp, G., & Proper, H. A. (2007). Overview 1th phase - General enterprise architecturing. White Paper GEA-1. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Ordina. In Dutch.
Wagter, R., Proper, H. A., & Witte, D. (2011). Enterprise coherence assessment. In F. Harmsen, K. R. Grahlmann, & E. Proper (Eds.), Practice-driven research on enterprise transformation (pp. 28–52). Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-23387-6.
Wagter, R., Proper, H. A., & Witte, D. (2012a). A practice-based framework for enterprise coherence. In H. A. Proper, A. F. Harmsen, K. Gaaloul, & S. Wrycza (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Working Conference Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation (PRET 2012), Gdansk, Poland (Vol. 120). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-31133-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31134-5
Wagter, R., Proper, H. A., & Witte, D. (2012b). Enterprise coherence in the Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment. In C. Huemer, G. Viscusi, I. Rychkova, & B. Andersson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Business/IT-Alignment and Interoperability (BUSITAL 2012). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Wagter, R., Proper, H. A., & Witte, D. (2012c). On the use of GEA at the Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment. In S. Rinderle-Ma, J. Sanz, & X.-Y. Bai (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC2012), Hangzhou, China (pp. 115–119). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. ISBN 978-0-769-54857-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2012.26
Wagter, R., Proper, H. A., & Witte, D. (2012d). The extended enterprise coherence-governance assessment. In S. Aier, M. Ekstedt, F. Matthes, E. Proper, J. L. Sanz (Eds.), Trends in enterprise architecture research and practice-driven research on enterprise transformation (pp. 218–235). Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-34162-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34163-2
Wagter, R., Proper, H. A., & Witte, D. (2013a). A theory for enterprise coherence governance. In P. Saha (Ed.), A systematic perspective to managing complexity with EA. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
Wagter, R., Proper, H. A., & Witte, D. (2013b). Enterprise coherence governance in the public sector. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (CBI 2013), Vienna, Austria (pp. 117–124). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2013.25.
Wagter, R., van den Berg, M., Luijpers, J., & van Steenbergen, M. E. (2005). Dynamic enterprise architecture; how to make it work. New York, NY: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-68272-1.
Walgenbach, P., & Meyer, R. E. (2008). Neoinstitutionalistische Organisationstheorie. Stuttgart, Germany: W. Kohlhammer.
Ward, J., & Daniel, E. (2006). Benefits management: Delivering value from IS and IT investments. New York, NY: Wiley.
Ward, J., Rennebaum, T., & Amling, S. (2012). Value Management. In A. Uhl & L. A. Gollenia (Eds.), A handbook of business transformation management methodology (pp. 57–81). Farnham: Gower.
Ward, J., & Uhl, A. (2012). Success and failure in transformation – Lessons from 13 case studies. 360 ∘ – The Business Transformation Journal, 2012(3), 30–38.
Watson, H. J., & Frolick, M. N. (1993). Determining information requirements for an EIS. MIS Quarterly, 17(3), 255–269.
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13–23.
Wegmann, A. (2003). On the systemic enterprise architecture methodology (SEAM). In International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2003).
Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361–86. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.361
Weiss, M. (2010). APC forum: Chubb’s enterprise architecture. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(4), 261–262.
Weiss, M. (2012). APC forum: Carestream health’s IT transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 11(1), 49–50.
Weiss, S., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2013). Institutionalization and the effectiveness of enterprise architecture management. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013), Milano, Italy. Association for Information Sytems.
Weiss, S., & Winter, R. (2012). Development of measurement items for the institutionalization of enterprise architecture management in organizations. In S. Aier, M. Ekstedt, F. Matthes, E. Proper, J. L. Sanz (Eds.), Trends in enterprise architecture research and practice-driven research on enterprise transformation (pp. 268–283), Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-34162-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34163-2
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072002
Wieringa, R. J. (2014). Design science methodology for information systems and software engineering. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-662-43838-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8
Wilkinson, M. (2006). Designing an ‘Adaptive’ enterprise architecture. BT Technology Journal, 24(4), 81–92. ISSN 1358-3948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10550-006-0099-5
Williams, C. K., & Karahanna, E. (2013). Causal explanation in the coordinating process: A critical realist case study of federated IT governance structures. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 933–964.
Winter, R. (2010). Business Engineering – Betriebswirtschaftliche Konstruktionslehre und ihre Anwendung im Gesundheitswesen. In P. Rohner & R. Winter (Eds.), Patientenidentifikation und Prozessorientierung - wesentliche Elemente des vernetzten Krankenhauses und der integrierten Versorgung (pp. 33–55). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Winter, R. (2012). Construction of situational information systems management methods. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD), 3(4), 67–85.
Winter, R. (2014). Architectural thinking. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(6), 361–364.
Winter, R., & Aier, S. (2011). How are enterprise architecture design principles used? In The 6h Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2011) at the 15th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2011), Helsinki, Finland (pp. 314–321). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
Winter, R., Bucher, T., Fischer, R., & Kurpjuweit, S. (2007). Analysis and application scenarios of enterprise architecture – An exploratory study (reprint). Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 3(3), 33–43.
Winter, R., & Fischer, R. (2006). Essential layers, artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture. In Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2006), Held at the 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2006), Hong Kong, China (p. 30). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2006.33.
Winter, R., & Fischer, R. (2007). Essential layers, artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 3(2), 7–18.
Winter, S. J., & Butler, B. S. (2011). Creating bigger problems: Grand challenges as boundary objects and the legitimacy of the information systems field. Journal of Information Technology, 26(2), 99–108.
Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139–153.
Yadav, S. B. (1985). Classifying an organization to identify its information requirements: A comprehensive framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2(1), 39–60.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research – Design and methods (4th ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications. ISBN 978-1-412-96099-1.
Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276–292.
Zeitz, G., Mittal, V., & McAulay, B. (1999). Distinguishing adoption and entrenchment of management practices: A framework for analysis. Organization Studies, 20(5), 741–776.
Zimmermann, H. (1980). OSI reference model – The ISO model of architecture for open systems interconnection. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 28(4), 425–432.
Zimmermann, O., Koehler, J., Leymann, F., Polley, R., & Schuster, N. (2009). Managing architectural decision models with dependency relations, integrity constraints, and production rules. Journal of Systems and Software, 82(8), 1249–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.01.039
Zuboff, S. (1985). Automate/informate: The two faces of intelligent technology. Organizational Dynamics, 14(2), 5–18.
Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726–743.
Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.
Zucker, L. G. (1991). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 83–107). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marosin, D., Ghanavati, S. (2017). Steering Transformations with Architecture Principles. In: Proper, H., Winter, R., Aier, S., de Kinderen, S. (eds) Architectural Coordination of Enterprise Transformation. The Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69584-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69584-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69583-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69584-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)