Abstract
Currently, there is a significant increase in the use of computed tomography (CT) and particularly of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis, staging, treatment response, and detection of potential recurrence in patients with gynecological cancer. The aim of this chapter is to review the diagnostic efficacy of these imaging modalities in the evaluation of endometrial and uterine cervical cancer.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Creasman W (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105(2):109
Amant F, Moerman P, Timmerman D et al (2005) Endometrial cancer. Lancet 366(9484):491–505
Patel S, Liyanage S, Sahdev A et al (2010) Imaging of endometrial and cervical cancer. Insights Imaging 1:309–328
Lee HJ, Dubinsky T, Andreotti R et al (2011) ACR appropriateness criteria pretreatment evaluation and follow-up of endometrial cancer of the uterus. Ultrasound Q 27:139–145
Fielding J, Brown D, Thurmond A (2011) Gynecologic imaging: expert radiology series. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia
Tsili AC, Tsampoulas C, Dalkalitsis N et al (2008) Local staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of multidetector CT. Eur Radiol 18(5):1043–1048
Kinkel K, Forstner R, Danza FM et al (2009) Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: guidelines of European society of urogenital imaging. Eur Radiol 19:1565–1574
Frei KA, Kinkel K (2001) Staging endometrial cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(6):850–855
Bourgioti C, Chatoupis K, Tzavara C (2016) Predictive ability of maximal tumor diameter on MRI for high-risk endometrial cancer. Abdominal. Radiology 41(12):2484–2495
Beddy P, Moyle P, Kataoka M et al (2012) Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion and overall staging in endometrial cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 262(2):530–537
Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105(2):107–108
Plante M, Roy M (2006) Fertility preserving options in cervical cancer. Oncology 20:479
Ozsarlak O, Tjalma W, Schepens E et al (2003) The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol 13:2338–2345
Hricak H, Gatsonis C, Coakley F et al (2007) Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation-ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. Radiology 245:491–498
Sala E, Wakely S, Senior E et al (2007) MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix. AJR 188:1577–1587
Bourgioti C, Chatoupis K, Moulopoulos LA (2016) Current imaging strategies for the evaluation of uterine cervical cancer. World J Radiol 8(4):342
Mitchell DG, Snyder B, Coakley F et al (2006) Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 24(36):5687–5694
Bourgioti C, Koutoulidis V, Chatoupis K et al (2014) MRI findings before and after abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART) for cervical cancer: a prospective study and review of the literature. Clin Radiol 69(7):678–686
Bourgioti C, Chatoupis K, Rodolakis A et al (2016) Incremental prognostic value of MRI in the staging of early cervical cancer: a prospective study and review of the literature. Clin Imaging 40(1):72–78
Hori M, Kim T, Murakami T et al (2009) Uterine cervical carcinoma: preoperative staging with 3.0-T MR imaging- comparison with 1.5-T MR imaging. Radiology 251:96–104
Charles-Edwards EM, Messiou C, Morgan VA et al (2008) Diffusion-weighted imaging in cervical cancer with an endovaginal technique: potential value for improving tumour detection in stage Ia and Ib1 disease. Radiology 249:541–550
Lin YC, Lin G, Chen YR et al (2011) Role of magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient at 3T in distinguishing between adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix and endometrium. Chang Gung Med J 34:93–100
Zand KR, Reinhold C, Abe H et al (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix. Cancer Imaging 7:69–76
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bourgioti, C.I. (2018). CT-MR Findings in Cervical and Endometrial Cancer. In: Gouliamos, A., Andreou, J., Kosmidis, P. (eds) Imaging in Clinical Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68873-2_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68873-2_42
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68872-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68873-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)